New Results
Selecting among three basic fitness landscape models: additive, multiplicative and stickbreaking
View ORCID ProfileCraig R. Miller, View ORCID ProfileJames T. Van Leuven, Holly A. Wichman, Paul Joyce
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/150763
Craig R. Miller
aCenter for Modeling Complex Interactions, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 84844
bDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844
cDepartment of Mathematics, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844
James T. Van Leuven
aCenter for Modeling Complex Interactions, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 84844
Holly A. Wichman
aCenter for Modeling Complex Interactions, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 84844
bDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844
Paul Joyce
cDepartment of Mathematics, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844
Article usage
Posted June 16, 2017.
Selecting among three basic fitness landscape models: additive, multiplicative and stickbreaking
Craig R. Miller, James T. Van Leuven, Holly A. Wichman, Paul Joyce
bioRxiv 150763; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/150763
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (11573)
- Bioengineering (8623)
- Bioinformatics (28875)
- Biophysics (14805)
- Cancer Biology (11944)
- Cell Biology (17170)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (9307)
- Ecology (14022)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (18129)
- Genetics (12148)
- Genomics (16619)
- Immunology (11712)
- Microbiology (27702)
- Molecular Biology (11401)
- Neuroscience (60106)
- Paleontology (448)
- Pathology (1849)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (3184)
- Physiology (4878)
- Plant Biology (10279)
- Synthetic Biology (2849)
- Systems Biology (7291)
- Zoology (1619)