RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Analysis of Copy Number Loss of the ErbB4 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase in Glioblastoma
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 154815
DO 10.1101/154815
A1 DeAnalisa C. Jones
A1 Adriana Scanteianu
A1 Matthew DiStefano
A1 Mehdi Bouhaddou
A1 Marc R. Birtwistle
YR 2017
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/06/23/154815.abstract
AB Current treatments for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)—an aggressive form of brain cancer—are minimally effective and yield a median survival of 14.6 months and a two-year survival rate of 30%. Given the severity of GBM and the limitations of its treatment, there is a need for the discovery of novel drug targets for GBM and more personalized treatment approaches based on the characteristics of an individual’s tumor. Most receptor tyrosine kinases—such as EGFR—act as oncogenes, but publicly available data from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) indicates copy number loss in the ERBB4 RTK gene across dozens of GBM cell lines, suggesting a potential tumor suppressor role. This loss is mutually exclusive with loss of its cognate ligand NRG1 in CCLE as well, more strongly suggesting a functional role. The availability of higher resolution copy number data from clinical GBM patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed that a region in Intron 1 of the ERBB4 gene was deleted in 69.1% of tumor samples harboring ERBB4 copy number loss; however, it was also found to be deleted in the matched normal tissue samples from these GBM patients (n = 81). Using the DECIPHER Genome Browser, we also discovered that this mutation occurs at approximately the same frequency in the general population as it does in the disease population. We conclude from these results that this loss in Intron 1 of the ERBB4 gene is neither a de novo driver mutation nor a predisposing factor to GBM, despite the indications from CCLE. A biological role of this significantly occurring genetic alteration is still unknown. While this is a negative result, the broader conclusion is that while copy number data from large cell line-based data repositories may yield compelling hypotheses, careful follow up with higher resolution copy number assays, patient data, and general population analyses are essential to codify initial hypotheses.