Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Contradictory Results

Mendelian randomization: a premature burial?

George Davey Smith
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/021386
George Davey Smith
University of Bristol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Mendelian randomization is a promising approach to help improve causal inference in observational studies, with widespread potential applications, including to prioritization of pharmacotherapeutic targets for evaluation in RCTs. From its initial proposal the limitations of Mendelian randomization approaches have been widely recognised and discussed, and recently Pickrell has reiterated these1. However this critique did not acknowledge recent developments in both methodological and empirical research, nor did it recognise many future opportunities for application of the Mendelian randomization approach. These issues are briefly reviewed here.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
  • Posted June 30, 2015.

Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mendelian randomization: a premature burial?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
Share
Mendelian randomization: a premature burial?
George Davey Smith
bioRxiv 021386; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/021386
Permalink:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Mendelian randomization: a premature burial?
George Davey Smith
bioRxiv 021386; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/021386

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (267)
  • Biochemistry (338)
  • Bioengineering (184)
  • Bioinformatics (2530)
  • Biophysics (600)
  • Cancer Biology (400)
  • Cell Biology (540)
  • Clinical Trials (13)
  • Developmental Biology (412)
  • Ecology (849)
  • Epidemiology (297)
  • Evolutionary Biology (2240)
  • Genetics (1391)
  • Genomics (1893)
  • Immunology (184)
  • Microbiology (884)
  • Molecular Biology (317)
  • Neuroscience (2533)
  • Paleontology (17)
  • Pathology (54)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (84)
  • Physiology (114)
  • Plant Biology (414)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (134)
  • Synthetic Biology (217)
  • Systems Biology (653)
  • Zoology (79)