Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The evolution of sex differences in disease genetics

William P. Gilks, Jessica K. Abbott, Edward H. Morrow
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/000414
William P. Gilks
†Evolution, Behaviour and Environment group, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QG, United Kingdom, URL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica K. Abbott
*Experimental Evolution, Ecology & Behaviour group, Department of Biology, Section for Evolutionary Ecology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, 22362 Lund, Sweden, URLs and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward H. Morrow
†Evolution, Behaviour and Environment group, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QG, United Kingdom, URL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

There are significant differences in the biology of males and females, ranging from biochemical pathways to behavioural responses, which are relevant to modern medicine. Broad-sense heritability estimates differ between the sexes for many common medical disorders, indicating that genetic architecture can be sex-dependent. Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully identified sex-specific and sex-biased effects, where in addition to sex-specific effects on gene expression, twenty-two medical traits have sex-specific or sex-biased loci. Sex-specific genetic architecture of complex traits is also extensively documented in model organisms using genome-wide linkage or association mapping, and in gene disruption studies. The evolutionary origins of sex-specific genetic architecture and sexual dimorphism lie in the fact that males and females share most of their genetic variation yet experience different selection pressures. At the extreme is sexual antagonism, where selection on an allele acts in opposite directions between the sexes. Sexual antagonism has been repeatedly identified via a number of experimental methods in a range of different taxa. Although the molecular basis remains to be identified, mathematical models predict the maintenance of deleterious variants that experience selection in a sex-dependent manner. There are multiple mechanisms by which sexual antagonism and alleles under sex-differential selection could contribute toward the genetics of common, complex disorders. The evidence we review clearly indicates that further research into sex-dependent selection and the sex-specific genetic architecture of diseases would be rewarding. This would be aided by studies of laboratory and wild animal populations, and by modelling sex-specific effects in genome-wide association data with joint, gene-by-sex interaction tests. We predict that even sexually monomorphic diseases may harbour cryptic sex-specific genetic architecture. Furthermore, empirical evidence suggests that investigating sex-dependent epistasis may be especially rewarding. Finally, the prevalent nature of sex-specific genetic architecture in disease offers scope for the development of more effective, sex-specific therapies.

Funding This work was supported by the European Research Council (WPG and EHM; Starting Grant #280632), a Royal Society University Research Fellowship (EHM), the Swedish Research Council (JKA), and the Volkswagen Foundation (JKA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY Unported 3.0 license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 14, 2013.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The evolution of sex differences in disease genetics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The evolution of sex differences in disease genetics
William P. Gilks, Jessica K. Abbott, Edward H. Morrow
bioRxiv 000414; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/000414
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The evolution of sex differences in disease genetics
William P. Gilks, Jessica K. Abbott, Edward H. Morrow
bioRxiv 000414; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/000414

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4222)
  • Biochemistry (9095)
  • Bioengineering (6733)
  • Bioinformatics (23916)
  • Biophysics (12066)
  • Cancer Biology (9484)
  • Cell Biology (13720)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7614)
  • Ecology (11644)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15459)
  • Genetics (10610)
  • Genomics (14281)
  • Immunology (9447)
  • Microbiology (22749)
  • Molecular Biology (9056)
  • Neuroscience (48811)
  • Paleontology (354)
  • Pathology (1478)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2558)
  • Physiology (3817)
  • Plant Biology (8299)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1466)
  • Synthetic Biology (2285)
  • Systems Biology (6163)
  • Zoology (1295)