Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A reassessment of consensus clustering for class discovery

Yasin Senbabaoglu, George Michailidis, Jun Z. Li
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/002642
Yasin Senbabaoglu
1Department of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: junzli@med.umich.edu yasin@cbio.mskcc.org
George Michailidis
2Department of Statistics and EECS, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jun Z. Li
3Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: junzli@med.umich.edu yasin@cbio.mskcc.org
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Consensus clustering (CC) is an unsupervised class discovery method widely used to study sample heterogeneity in high-dimensional datasets. It calculates “consensus rate” between any two samples as how frequently they are grouped together in repeated clustering runs under a certain degree of random perturbation. The pairwise consensus rates form a between-sample similarity matrix, which has been used (1) as a visual proof that clusters exist, (2) for comparing stability among clusters, and (3) for estimating the optimal number (K) of clusters. However, the sensitivity and specificity of CC have not been systemically studied. To assess its performance, we investigated the most common implementations of CC; and compared CC with other popular methods that also focus on cluster stability and estimation of K. We evaluated these methods using simulated datasets with either known structure or known absence of structure. Our results showed that (1) CC was able to divide randomly generated unimodal data into pre-specified numbers of clusters, and was able to show apparent stability of these chance partitions of known cluster-less data; (2) for data with known structure, the proportion of ambiguously clustered (PAC) pairs infers the known number of clusters more reliably than several commonly used K estimating methods; and (3) validation of the optimal K by choosing the most discriminant genes from the discovery cohort and applying them in an independent cohort often exaggerates the confidence in K due to inherent gene-gene correlations among the selected genes. While these results do not yet prove that any of the published studies using CC has generated false positive findings, they show that datasets with subtle or no structure are fully capable of producing strong evidence of consensus clustering. We therefore recommend caution is using CC in class discovery and validation.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 11, 2014.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A reassessment of consensus clustering for class discovery
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A reassessment of consensus clustering for class discovery
Yasin Senbabaoglu, George Michailidis, Jun Z. Li
bioRxiv 002642; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/002642
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A reassessment of consensus clustering for class discovery
Yasin Senbabaoglu, George Michailidis, Jun Z. Li
bioRxiv 002642; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/002642

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3520)
  • Biochemistry (7373)
  • Bioengineering (5357)
  • Bioinformatics (20352)
  • Biophysics (10058)
  • Cancer Biology (7789)
  • Cell Biology (11360)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6457)
  • Ecology (9995)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13372)
  • Genetics (9379)
  • Genomics (12624)
  • Immunology (7735)
  • Microbiology (19122)
  • Molecular Biology (7482)
  • Neuroscience (41195)
  • Paleontology (301)
  • Pathology (1236)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2145)
  • Physiology (3188)
  • Plant Biology (6885)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1277)
  • Synthetic Biology (1901)
  • Systems Biology (5332)
  • Zoology (1091)