New Results
Measuring error rates in genomic perturbation screens: gold standards for human functional genomics
Traver Hart, Kevin R. Brown, Fabrice Sircoulomb, Robert Rottapel, Jason Moffat
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/003327
Traver Hart
1Donnelly Centre and Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Kevin R. Brown
1Donnelly Centre and Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Fabrice Sircoulomb
3Campbell Family Cancer Research Institute, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
Robert Rottapel
3Campbell Family Cancer Research Institute, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
4Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
5Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
Jason Moffat
1Donnelly Centre and Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
2Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Article usage
Posted March 17, 2014.
Measuring error rates in genomic perturbation screens: gold standards for human functional genomics
Traver Hart, Kevin R. Brown, Fabrice Sircoulomb, Robert Rottapel, Jason Moffat
bioRxiv 003327; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/003327
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (8807)
- Bioengineering (6508)
- Bioinformatics (23446)
- Biophysics (11783)
- Cancer Biology (9196)
- Cell Biology (13307)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (7428)
- Ecology (11402)
- Epidemiology (2066)
- Evolutionary Biology (15141)
- Genetics (10429)
- Genomics (14036)
- Immunology (9167)
- Microbiology (22142)
- Molecular Biology (8802)
- Neuroscience (47533)
- Paleontology (350)
- Pathology (1427)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (2489)
- Physiology (3729)
- Plant Biology (8076)
- Synthetic Biology (2220)
- Systems Biology (6036)
- Zoology (1252)