Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The impact of radio-tags on Ruby-throated Hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris)

Theodore J. Zenzal Jr., Robert H. Diehl, Frank R. Moore
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/008029
Theodore J. Zenzal Jr.
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tjzenzal@gmail.com
Robert H. Diehl
2U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Bozeman, Montana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank R. Moore
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Radio telemetry has advanced the field of wildlife biology, especially with the miniaturization of radio-tags. However, the major limitation faced with radio-tagging birds is the size of the animal to which a radio-tag can be attached. We tested how miniature radio-tags affected flight performance and behavior of Ruby-throated Hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris), possibly the smallest bird species to be fitted with radio-tags. Using eyelash adhesive, we fitted hatch year individuals (n=20 males and 15 females) with faux radio-tags of three sizes varying in mass and antenna length (220mg-12.7cm, 240mg-12.7cm, and 220mg-6.35cm), then filmed the birds in a field aviary to quantify activity budgets. We also estimated flight range using flight simulation models. When the three radio-tag packages were pooled for analysis, the presence of a radio-tag significantly decreased both flight time (-8%) and modeled flight range (-23%) when compared to control birds. However, a multiple comparison analysis between the different packages revealed that there was a significant difference in flight time when the larger radio-tag package (240mg) was attached and no significant difference in flight time when the lighter radio-tag packages (220mg) were attached. Our results are similar to other studies which analyzed the flight time or flight range of birds wearing radio-tags. Therefore, currently available light weight radio-tags (≤220mg) may be a new option to aid in the study of hummingbird biology. Future study should focus upon the additional drag created by the radio-tag and the effects of the lightest radio-tag packages on free ranging birds. These studies would provide additional information to determine the feasibility on the use of radio-tags to study hummingbird biology.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 14, 2014.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The impact of radio-tags on Ruby-throated Hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris)
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The impact of radio-tags on Ruby-throated Hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris)
Theodore J. Zenzal Jr., Robert H. Diehl, Frank R. Moore
bioRxiv 008029; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/008029
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The impact of radio-tags on Ruby-throated Hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris)
Theodore J. Zenzal Jr., Robert H. Diehl, Frank R. Moore
bioRxiv 008029; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/008029

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Zoology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4241)
  • Biochemistry (9173)
  • Bioengineering (6804)
  • Bioinformatics (24064)
  • Biophysics (12155)
  • Cancer Biology (9564)
  • Cell Biology (13824)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7658)
  • Ecology (11737)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15541)
  • Genetics (10672)
  • Genomics (14359)
  • Immunology (9512)
  • Microbiology (22903)
  • Molecular Biology (9129)
  • Neuroscience (49113)
  • Paleontology (357)
  • Pathology (1487)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2583)
  • Physiology (3851)
  • Plant Biology (8351)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1473)
  • Synthetic Biology (2301)
  • Systems Biology (6205)
  • Zoology (1302)