Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A theoretical justification for single molecule peptide sequencing

Jagannath Swaminathan, Alexander A. Boulgakov, Edward M. Marcotte
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/010587
Jagannath Swaminathan
Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, & Department of Molecular Biosciences University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander A. Boulgakov
Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, & Department of Molecular Biosciences University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward M. Marcotte
Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, & Department of Molecular Biosciences University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The proteomes of cells, tissues, and organisms reflect active cellular processes and change continuously in response to intracellular and extracellular cues. Deep, quantitative profiling of the proteome, especially if combined with mRNA and metabolite measurements, should provide an unprecedented view of cell state, better revealing functions and interactions of cell components. Molecular diagnostics and biomarker should benefit particularly from the accurate quantification of proteomes, since complex diseases like cancer change protein abundances and modifications. Currently, shotgun mass spectrometry is the primary technology for high-throughput protein identification and quantification; while powerful, it lacks high sensitivity and coverage. We draw parallels with next-generation DNA sequencing and propose a strategy, termed fluorosequencing, for sequencing peptides in a complex protein sample at the level of single molecules. In the proposed approach, millions of individual fluorescently labeled peptides are visualized in parallel, monitoring changing patterns of fluorescence intensity as N-terminal amino acids are sequentially removed, and using the resulting fluorescence signatures (fluorosequences) to uniquely identify individual peptides. We introduce a theoretical foundation for fluorosequencing, and by using Monte Carlo computer simulations, we explore its feasibility, anticipate the most likely experimental errors, quantify their potential impact, and discuss the broad potential utility offered by a high-throughput peptide sequencing technology.

AUTHOR SUMMARY The development of next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing methods has transformed biology, with current platforms generating >1 billion sequencing reads per run. Unfortunately, no method of similar scale and throughput exists to identify and quantify specific proteins in complex mixtures, representing a critical bottleneck in many biochemical and molecular diagnostic assays. What is urgently needed is a massively parallel method, akin to next-gen DNA sequencing, for identifying and quantifying peptides or proteins in a sample. In principle, single-molecule peptide sequencing could achieve this goal, allowing billions of distinct peptides to be sequenced in parallel and thereby identifying proteins composing the sample and digitally quantifying them by direct counting of peptides. Here, we discuss theoretical considerations of single molecule peptide sequencing, suggest one possible experimental strategy, and, using computer simulations, characterize the potential utility and unusual properties of this future proteomics technology.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 22, 2014.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A theoretical justification for single molecule peptide sequencing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A theoretical justification for single molecule peptide sequencing
Jagannath Swaminathan, Alexander A. Boulgakov, Edward M. Marcotte
bioRxiv 010587; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/010587
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A theoretical justification for single molecule peptide sequencing
Jagannath Swaminathan, Alexander A. Boulgakov, Edward M. Marcotte
bioRxiv 010587; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/010587

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4086)
  • Biochemistry (8761)
  • Bioengineering (6479)
  • Bioinformatics (23339)
  • Biophysics (11750)
  • Cancer Biology (9149)
  • Cell Biology (13247)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7416)
  • Ecology (11369)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15087)
  • Genetics (10398)
  • Genomics (14009)
  • Immunology (9121)
  • Microbiology (22040)
  • Molecular Biology (8779)
  • Neuroscience (47366)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1420)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2482)
  • Physiology (3704)
  • Plant Biology (8050)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1431)
  • Synthetic Biology (2208)
  • Systems Biology (6016)
  • Zoology (1249)