Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
Confirmatory Results

What to compare and how: comparative transcriptomics for Evo-Devo

Julien Roux, Marta Rosikiewicz, Marc Robinson-Rechavi
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/011213
Julien Roux
1Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne
2Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
3Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Rosikiewicz
1Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne
2Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Robinson-Rechavi
1Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne
2Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Evolutionary developmental biology has grown historically from the capacity to relate patterns of evolution in anatomy to patterns of evolution of expression of specific genes, whether between very distantly related species, or very closely related species or populations. Scaling up such studies by taking advantage of modern transcriptomics brings promising improvements, allowing us to estimate the overall impact and molecular mechanisms of convergence, constraint or innovation in anatomy and development. But it also presents major challenges, including the computational definitions of anatomical homology and of organ function, the criteria for the comparison of developmental stages, the annotation of transcriptomics data to proper anatomical and developmental terms, and the statistical methods to compare transcriptomic data between species to highlight significant conservation or changes. In this article, we review these challenges, and the ongoing efforts to address them, which are emerging from bioinformatics work on ontologies, evolutionary statistics, and data curation, with a focus on their implementation in the context of the development of our database Bgee (http://bgee.org).

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 07, 2014.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What to compare and how: comparative transcriptomics for Evo-Devo
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
What to compare and how: comparative transcriptomics for Evo-Devo
Julien Roux, Marta Rosikiewicz, Marc Robinson-Rechavi
bioRxiv 011213; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/011213
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
What to compare and how: comparative transcriptomics for Evo-Devo
Julien Roux, Marta Rosikiewicz, Marc Robinson-Rechavi
bioRxiv 011213; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/011213

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2543)
  • Biochemistry (4994)
  • Bioengineering (3497)
  • Bioinformatics (15279)
  • Biophysics (6926)
  • Cancer Biology (5427)
  • Cell Biology (7771)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4558)
  • Ecology (7180)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10261)
  • Genetics (7532)
  • Genomics (9826)
  • Immunology (4899)
  • Microbiology (13304)
  • Molecular Biology (5165)
  • Neuroscience (29569)
  • Paleontology (203)
  • Pathology (842)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1470)
  • Physiology (2153)
  • Plant Biology (4780)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1015)
  • Synthetic Biology (1343)
  • Systems Biology (4022)
  • Zoology (771)