Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The effect of carbon subsidies on marine planktonic niche partitioning and recruitment during biofilm assembly

Charles Pepe-Ranney, Edward Hall
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/013938
Charles Pepe-Ranney
1Cornell University, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Ithaca, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Hall
2Colorado State University, Natural Resource and Ecology Laboratory, Fort Collings, CO, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ed.hall@colostate.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The influence of resource availability on planktonic and biofilm microbial community membership is poorly understood. Heterotrophic bacteria derive some to all of their organic carbon (C) from photoautotrophs while simultaneously competing with photoautotrophs for inorganic nutrients such as phosphorus (P) or nitrogen (N). Therefore, C inputs have the potential to shift the competitive balance of aquatic microbial communities by increasing the resource space available to heterotrophs (more C) while decreasing the resource space available to photoautotrophs (less mineral nutrients due to increased competition from heterotrophs). To test how resource dynamics affect membership of planktonic communities and assembly of biofilm communities we amended a series of flow-through mesocosms with C to alter the availability of C among treatments. Each mesocosm was fed with unfiltered seawater and incubated with sterilized microscope slides as surfaces for biofilm formation. The highest C treatment had the highest planktonic heterotroph abundance, lowest planktonic photoautotroph abundance, and highest biofilm biomass. We surveyed bacterial 16S rRNA genes and plastid 23S rRNA genes to characterize biofilm and planktonic community membership and structure. Regardless of resource additions, biofilm communities had higher alpha diversity than planktonic communities in all mesocosms. Heterotrophic plankton communities were distinct from heterotrophic biofilm communities in all but the highest C treatment where heterotrophic plankton and biofilm communities resembled each other after 17 days. Unlike the heterotrophs, photoautotrophic plankton communities were different than photoautotrophic biofilm communities in composition in all treatments including the highest C treatment. Our results suggest that although resource amendments affect community membership and structure, microbial lifestyle (biofilm versus planktonic) has a stronger influence on community composition.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 19, 2015.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The effect of carbon subsidies on marine planktonic niche partitioning and recruitment during biofilm assembly
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The effect of carbon subsidies on marine planktonic niche partitioning and recruitment during biofilm assembly
Charles Pepe-Ranney, Edward Hall
bioRxiv 013938; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/013938
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The effect of carbon subsidies on marine planktonic niche partitioning and recruitment during biofilm assembly
Charles Pepe-Ranney, Edward Hall
bioRxiv 013938; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/013938

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2517)
  • Biochemistry (4964)
  • Bioengineering (3469)
  • Bioinformatics (15181)
  • Biophysics (6885)
  • Cancer Biology (5380)
  • Cell Biology (7711)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4518)
  • Ecology (7135)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10210)
  • Genetics (7497)
  • Genomics (9767)
  • Immunology (4822)
  • Microbiology (13179)
  • Molecular Biology (5129)
  • Neuroscience (29367)
  • Paleontology (203)
  • Pathology (835)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1460)
  • Physiology (2129)
  • Plant Biology (4734)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1008)
  • Synthetic Biology (1337)
  • Systems Biology (4002)
  • Zoology (768)