Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Phylogenomic Analyses Support Traditional Relationships within Cnidaria

View ORCID ProfileFelipe Zapata, View ORCID ProfileFreya E. Goetz, View ORCID ProfileStephen A. Smith, View ORCID ProfileMark Howison, View ORCID ProfileStefan Siebert, View ORCID ProfileSamuel H. Church, View ORCID ProfileSteven M Sanders, View ORCID ProfileCheryl Lewis Ames, View ORCID ProfileCatherine S. McFadden, View ORCID ProfileScott C. France, View ORCID ProfileMarymegan Daly, View ORCID ProfileAllen G. Collins, View ORCID ProfileSteven H.D. Haddock, View ORCID ProfileCasey W. Dunn, View ORCID ProfilePaulyn Cartwright
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/017632
Felipe Zapata
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Felipe Zapata
  • For correspondence: felipe_zapata@brown.edu
Freya E. Goetz
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Freya E. Goetz
Stephen A. Smith
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephen A. Smith
Mark Howison
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
2Computing and Information Services, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark Howison
Stefan Siebert
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stefan Siebert
Samuel H. Church
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Samuel H. Church
Steven M Sanders
3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Steven M Sanders
Cheryl Lewis Ames
4Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, Washington District of Columbia, United States of America
5Biological Sciences Graduate Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cheryl Lewis Ames
Catherine S. McFadden
6Department of Biology, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Catherine S. McFadden
Scott C. France
7Department of Biology, The University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Scott C. France
Marymegan Daly
8Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marymegan Daly
Allen G. Collins
4Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, Washington District of Columbia, United States of America
9National Systematics Laboratory of NOAA’s Fisheries Service, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Allen G. Collins
Steven H.D. Haddock
10Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Steven H.D. Haddock
Casey W. Dunn
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Casey W. Dunn
Paulyn Cartwright
3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paulyn Cartwright
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Cnidaria, the sister group to Bilateria, is a highly diverse group of animals in terms of morphology, lifecycles, ecology, and development. How this diversity originated and evolved is not well understood because phylogenetic relationships among major cnidarian lineages are unclear, and recent studies present contrasting phylogenetic hypotheses. Here, we use transcriptome data from 15 newly-sequenced species in combination with 26 publicly available genomes and transcriptomes to assess phylogenetic relationships among major cnidarian lineages. Phylogenetic analyses using different partition schemes and models of molecular evolution, as well as topology tests for alternative phylogenetic relationships, support the monophyly of Medusozoa, Anthozoa, Octocorallia, Hydrozoa, and a clade consisting of Staurozoa, Cubozoa, and Scyphozoa. Support for the monophyly of Hexacorallia is weak due to the equivocal position of Ceriantharia. Taken together, these results further resolve deep cnidarian relationships, largely support traditional phylogenetic views on relationships, and provide a historical framework for studying the evolutionary processes involved in one of the most ancient animal radiations.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 09, 2015.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phylogenomic Analyses Support Traditional Relationships within Cnidaria
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Phylogenomic Analyses Support Traditional Relationships within Cnidaria
Felipe Zapata, Freya E. Goetz, Stephen A. Smith, Mark Howison, Stefan Siebert, Samuel H. Church, Steven M Sanders, Cheryl Lewis Ames, Catherine S. McFadden, Scott C. France, Marymegan Daly, Allen G. Collins, Steven H.D. Haddock, Casey W. Dunn, Paulyn Cartwright
bioRxiv 017632; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/017632
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Phylogenomic Analyses Support Traditional Relationships within Cnidaria
Felipe Zapata, Freya E. Goetz, Stephen A. Smith, Mark Howison, Stefan Siebert, Samuel H. Church, Steven M Sanders, Cheryl Lewis Ames, Catherine S. McFadden, Scott C. France, Marymegan Daly, Allen G. Collins, Steven H.D. Haddock, Casey W. Dunn, Paulyn Cartwright
bioRxiv 017632; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/017632

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4238)
  • Biochemistry (9159)
  • Bioengineering (6797)
  • Bioinformatics (24054)
  • Biophysics (12149)
  • Cancer Biology (9564)
  • Cell Biology (13819)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7654)
  • Ecology (11733)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15536)
  • Genetics (10665)
  • Genomics (14353)
  • Immunology (9504)
  • Microbiology (22887)
  • Molecular Biology (9120)
  • Neuroscience (49094)
  • Paleontology (357)
  • Pathology (1487)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2579)
  • Physiology (3851)
  • Plant Biology (8349)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1473)
  • Synthetic Biology (2300)
  • Systems Biology (6204)
  • Zoology (1302)