Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility

Stephen R. Piccolo, Adam B. Lee, Michael B. Frampton
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/022707
Stephen R. Piccolo
1Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Stephen_Piccolo@byu.edu
Adam B. Lee
1Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael B. Frampton
2Department of Computer Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

When reporting research findings, scientists document the steps they followed so that others can verify and build upon the research. When those steps have been described in sufficient detail that others can retrace the steps and obtain similar results, the research is said to be reproducible. Computers play a vital role in many research disciplines and present both opportunities and challenges for reproducibility. Computers can be programmed to execute analysis tasks, and those programs can be repeated and shared with others. Due to the deterministic nature of most computer programs, the same analysis tasks, applied to the same data, will often produce the same outputs. However, in practice, computational findings often cannot be reproduced, due to complexities in how software is packaged, installed, and executed—and due to limitations in how scientists document analysis steps. Many tools and techniques are available to help overcome these challenges. Here we describe six such strategies. With a broad scientific audience in mind, we describe strengths and limitations of each approach, as well as circumstances under which each might be applied. No single strategy is sufficient for every scenario; thus we emphasize that it is often useful to combine approaches.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 17, 2015.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility
Stephen R. Piccolo, Adam B. Lee, Michael B. Frampton
bioRxiv 022707; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/022707
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility
Stephen R. Piccolo, Adam B. Lee, Michael B. Frampton
bioRxiv 022707; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/022707

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4113)
  • Biochemistry (8815)
  • Bioengineering (6518)
  • Bioinformatics (23460)
  • Biophysics (11789)
  • Cancer Biology (9207)
  • Cell Biology (13322)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7436)
  • Ecology (11409)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15150)
  • Genetics (10436)
  • Genomics (14043)
  • Immunology (9171)
  • Microbiology (22153)
  • Molecular Biology (8812)
  • Neuroscience (47567)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1428)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2491)
  • Physiology (3730)
  • Plant Biology (8079)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1437)
  • Synthetic Biology (2221)
  • Systems Biology (6037)
  • Zoology (1253)