Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Spike Detection Using FRI Methods and Protein Calcium Sensors: Performance Analysis and Comparisons

Stephanie Reynolds, Jon Oñativia, Caroline S Copeland, View ORCID ProfileSimon R Schultz, View ORCID ProfilePier Luigi Dragotti
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/029124
Stephanie Reynolds
*Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jon Oñativia
*Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline S Copeland
†Centre for Neurotechnology and Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon R Schultz
†Centre for Neurotechnology and Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Simon R Schultz
Pier Luigi Dragotti
*Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pier Luigi Dragotti
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Fast and accurate detection of action potentials from neurophysiological data is key to the study of information processing in the nervous system. Previous work has shown that finite rate of innovation (FRI) theory can be used to successfully reconstruct spike trains from noisy calcium imaging data. This is due to the fact that calcium imaging data can be modeled as streams of decaying exponentials which are a subclass of FRI signals. Recent progress in the development of genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) has produced protein calcium sensors that exceed the sensitivity of the synthetic dyes traditionally used in calcium imaging experiments. In this paper, we compare the suitability for spike detection of the kinetics of a new family of GECIs (the GCaMP6 family) with the synthetic dye Oregon Green BAPTA-1. We demonstrate the high performance of the FRI algorithm on surrogate data for each calcium indicator and we calculate the Cramér-Rao lower bound on the uncertainty of the position of a detected spike in calcium imaging data for each calcium indicator.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 14, 2015.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Spike Detection Using FRI Methods and Protein Calcium Sensors: Performance Analysis and Comparisons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Spike Detection Using FRI Methods and Protein Calcium Sensors: Performance Analysis and Comparisons
Stephanie Reynolds, Jon Oñativia, Caroline S Copeland, Simon R Schultz, Pier Luigi Dragotti
bioRxiv 029124; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/029124
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Spike Detection Using FRI Methods and Protein Calcium Sensors: Performance Analysis and Comparisons
Stephanie Reynolds, Jon Oñativia, Caroline S Copeland, Simon R Schultz, Pier Luigi Dragotti
bioRxiv 029124; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/029124

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4086)
  • Biochemistry (8759)
  • Bioengineering (6479)
  • Bioinformatics (23339)
  • Biophysics (11748)
  • Cancer Biology (9148)
  • Cell Biology (13245)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7415)
  • Ecology (11369)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15086)
  • Genetics (10397)
  • Genomics (14009)
  • Immunology (9119)
  • Microbiology (22039)
  • Molecular Biology (8779)
  • Neuroscience (47357)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1420)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2482)
  • Physiology (3704)
  • Plant Biology (8049)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1431)
  • Synthetic Biology (2208)
  • Systems Biology (6015)
  • Zoology (1249)