New Results

Comparing the Citation Performance of PNAS Papers by Submission Track

Philip M. Davis
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/036616

Article usage

Article usage: January 2018 to September 2024

AbstractFullPdf
Jan 201827017
Feb 20182209
Mar 201833011
Apr 20182209
May 201836014
Jun 201845023
Jul 201848012
Aug 201861011
Sep 20184509
Oct 201826019
Nov 201826016
Dec 201830015
Jan 201930020
Feb 201945023
Mar 201934223
Apr 201915013
May 201932416
Jun 201932423
Jul 2019392127
Aug 2019281815
Oct 201936817
Nov 201925516
Dec 201920512
Jan 2020361514
Feb 2020301015
Mar 2020311718
May 202031825
Jun 202035224
Jul 202044629
Aug 202022324
Sep 202040415
Oct 202029715
Nov 202021720
Dec 202028716
Jan 202121722
Feb 202124713
Mar 2021302911
Apr 20213514
May 202174224
Jun 202152110
Jul 202152012
Aug 20214565
Sep 202150515
Oct 202174629
Nov 202155723
Dec 20218746
Jan 20226026
Feb 20224024
Mar 20222312
Apr 202247821
May 202219212
Jun 20222038
Jul 20222215
Aug 202219012
Sep 202211011
Oct 20222113
Nov 202232014
Dec 202219019
Jan 202315012
Feb 20231513
Mar 20231308
Apr 202319019
May 20236012
Jun 20231846
Jul 202314519
Aug 20239613
Sep 2023907
Oct 20231404
Nov 20233148
Dec 202330199
Jan 20241859
Feb 20242257
Mar 202416255
Apr 202417413
May 202418212
Jun 202457317
Jul 202427410
Aug 202411614
Sep 20241053
Back to top
Posted January 13, 2016.
Download PDF
Email
Comparing the Citation Performance of PNAS Papers by Submission Track
Philip M. Davis
bioRxiv 036616; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/036616
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area