Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Inter- and intra-individual differences in fluid reasoning show distinct cortical responses

Rogier A. Kievit, H. Steven Scholte, Lourens J. Waldorp, Denny Borsboom
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/039412
Rogier A. Kievit
1Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd, Cambridge CB2 7EF,
2Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands H.S.Scholte@uva.nl, ,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Rogier.Kievit@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk Rogier.Kievit@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk L.J.Waldorp@uva.nl D.Borsboom@uva.nl
H. Steven Scholte
2Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands H.S.Scholte@uva.nl, ,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: L.J.Waldorp@uva.nl D.Borsboom@uva.nl
Lourens J. Waldorp
2Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands H.S.Scholte@uva.nl, ,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: L.J.Waldorp@uva.nl D.Borsboom@uva.nl
Denny Borsboom
2Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands H.S.Scholte@uva.nl, ,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: L.J.Waldorp@uva.nl D.Borsboom@uva.nl
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Fluid intelligence is a general cognitive ability associated with problem solving in the absence of task-specific knowledge. Neuroscientific studies of fluid intelligence have studied both fluid intelligence tasks of varying difficulty and individual differences in fluid intelligence ability, but have failed to appropriately distinguish the two dimensions. Here we use task-based fMRI (N=34) to show that within and between subject dimensions show both partial overlap and widespread differences. Individuals with higher ability showed widespread increased activity including bilateral frontoparietal systems, whereas more difficult items were associated with more focal activity increases in middle frontal gyri, frontal poles and superior frontal poles. Finally, we show that when difficulty is equated across individuals, those with higher ability tend to show more fronto-parietal activity, whereas low fluid intelligence individuals tend to show greater activity in higher visual areas. The fMRI and behavioural data for our paper are freely available in online repositories.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 10, 2016.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inter- and intra-individual differences in fluid reasoning show distinct cortical responses
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Inter- and intra-individual differences in fluid reasoning show distinct cortical responses
Rogier A. Kievit, H. Steven Scholte, Lourens J. Waldorp, Denny Borsboom
bioRxiv 039412; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/039412
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Inter- and intra-individual differences in fluid reasoning show distinct cortical responses
Rogier A. Kievit, H. Steven Scholte, Lourens J. Waldorp, Denny Borsboom
bioRxiv 039412; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/039412

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4091)
  • Biochemistry (8783)
  • Bioengineering (6490)
  • Bioinformatics (23375)
  • Biophysics (11761)
  • Cancer Biology (9163)
  • Cell Biology (13266)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7419)
  • Ecology (11378)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15100)
  • Genetics (10406)
  • Genomics (14017)
  • Immunology (9133)
  • Microbiology (22084)
  • Molecular Biology (8792)
  • Neuroscience (47417)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1421)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2483)
  • Physiology (3709)
  • Plant Biology (8056)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1433)
  • Synthetic Biology (2213)
  • Systems Biology (6019)
  • Zoology (1251)