New Results

Histone H1 limits DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa

Michael Seymour, Lexiang Ji, Alex M. Santos, Masayuki Kamei, Takahiko Sasaki, Evelina Y. Basenko, Robert J. Schmitz, Xiaoyu Zhang, Zachary A. Lewis
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/041285

ABSTRACT

Histone H1 variants, known as linker histones, are essential chromatin components in higher eukaryotes, yet compared to the core histones relatively little is known about their in vivo functions. The filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa encodes a single H1 protein that is not essential for viability. To investigate the role of N. crassa H1, we constructed a functional FLAG-tagged H1 fusion protein and performed genomic and molecular analyses. Cell fractionation experiments showed that H1-FLAG is a chromatin binding protein. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation combined with sequencing (ChIP-seq) revealed that H1-3XFLAG is globally enriched throughout the genome with a subtle preference for promoters of expressed genes. In mammals, the stochiometery of H1 impacts nucleosome repeat length. To determine if H1 impacts nucleosome occupancy or nucleosome positioning in N. crassa, we performed Micrococcal nuclease digestion in wildtype and the ΔhH1 strain followed by sequencing (MNase-seq). Deletion of hH1 did not significantly impact nucleosome positioning or nucleosome occupancy. Analysis of DNA methylation by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (MethylC-seq) revealed a modest but global increase in DNA methylation in the ΔhH1 mutant. Together, these data suggest that H1 acts as a non-specific chromatin binding protein that can limit accessibility of the DNA methylation machinery in N. crassa.

INTRODUCTION

In eukaryotes, packaging of genomic DNA into chromatin is essential for genome function. The most basic unit of the chromatin fiber is the nucleosome core particle (NCP), made up of ~146 bp of DNA wrapped around a core of histones H3, H4, H2A and H2B (Kornberg and Thomas 1974; Olins and Olins 1974; Luger et al. 1997). In addition to the core histones many organisms encode one or more H1 proteins, also known as linker histones. H1 proteins are evolutionarily unrelated to the core histones and are characterized by a central winged helix domain, or globular domain, flanked by unstructured N-and C-termini (Cerf et al. 1993; Ramakrishnan et al. 1993; Kasinsky et al. 2001). Early studies showed that animal H1 proteins bind outside of the NCP (Baldwin et al. 1975; Shaw et al. 1976) and can protect an additional 20bp of DNA from nuclease digestion (Whitlock and Simpson 1976; Noll and Kornberg 1977). Subsequent studies revealed that H1 binds near the NCP dyad axis and can interact with DNA as it enters and exits the NCP (recently reviewed in Bednar et al. 2015). Although the interactions between H1 and the NCP have been extensively investigated, H1’s roles in the cell remain poorly understood.

In vivo studies of mammalian H1 are complicated by the existence of 11 H1 variants that appear to be partially redundant (Pan and Fan 2015). Deletion of single H1 variants failed to produce significant phenotypes in mice (Fan et al. 2001), but mice lacking three H1 variants are inviable (Fan et al. 2003) and triple-knockout embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are unable to differentiate (Zhang et al. 2012a). These and other data suggest that animal H1 variants cooperate to perform critical functions, influencing gene regulation (Fan et al. 2005b; Li et al. 2012b; Zhang et al. 2012b), establishment and/or maintenance of chromatin modification patterns (Li et al. 2012b; Zhang et al. 2012a; Yang et al. 2013; Lu et al. 2013) and formation of higher order chromatin structures (Fan et al. 2005b; Geeven et al. 2015).

Less is known about the functions of H1 in other groups of organisms, but genetic studies have been carried out in a handful of microbial model systems. H1 is not essential for viability in the single-celled Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Patterton et al. 1998) or Tetrahymena thermophila (Shen et al. 1995). Similarly, H1-deficient mutants are viable in several filamentous fungi including Neu-rospora crassa (Folco et al. 2003), Aspergillus nidulans (Ramón et al. 2000), and Ascobolus immersus (Barra et al. 2000). The yeast H1 homolog Hho1p suppresses homologous recombination (Downs et al. 2003; Li et al. 2008), impacts ribosomal RNA processing (Levy et al. 2008), and influences chromatin compaction during stationary phase (Schäfer et al. 2008). In T. thermophila, H1 is required for normal chromatin compaction in macronuclei and influences expression of a small number of genes (Shen et al. 1995; SHEN and GOROVSKY 1996). It is important to note that both yeast Hho1p and T. thermophila H1 have atypical protein structures. The yeast protein contains two globular domains, whereas the T. thermophila protein lacks a globular domain altogether. Thus, it is not clear if these proteins are functionally analogous to H1 in other organisms.

The filamentous fungi N. crassa, A. nidulans, and A. immersus encode H1 proteins with a canonical tripartite structure, raising the possibility that these genetic systems can be used to gain insights into H1 function in plants and animals. In N. crassa, an hH1-deficient strain displayed reduced growth and H1 was required for repression of the cfp gene in the presence of ethanol (Folco et al. 2003). In A. immersus, H1 gene silencing led to increased nuclease accessibility and increased DNA methylation (Barra et al. 2000). In contrast, deletion of hhoA in A. nidulans failed to produce a phenotype (Ramón et al. 2000). In general, the functions of H1 in filamentous fungi remain poorly understood. Moreover, it is not clear if H1 plays similar roles in fungal and animal cells. In the present study, we utilized molecular and genomic approaches to investigate the functions of H1 in the model fungus N. crassa. We confirmed that N. crassa H1 is a chromatin component in vivo, and we found that H1 is not a major determinant of nucleosome positioning, nucleosome repeat length, or nucleosome occupancy. We report that an H1 fusion protein exhibits enhanced enrichment at nucleosome free regions in a ChIP-seq assay and that loss of H1 causes a global increase in DNA methylation.

>MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains, Growth Media, and Molecular Analyses

All Neurospora strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary File 1. Knockout strains of hH1 were generated by the Neurospora gene knockout consortium (Colot et al. 2006) and obtained from the Fungal Genetics Stock Center (McCluskey et al. 2010). Neurospora cultures were grown at 32° in Vogel’s minimal medium (VMM) + 1.5% sucrose (Davis et al. 1970). Crosses were performed on modified synthetic cross medium at 25° (Davis et al. 1970). For plating assays, Neurospora conidia were plated on VMM with 2.0% sorbose, 0.5% fructose, and 0.5% glucose. When relevant, plates included 200 μg/mL hygromycin or 400 μg/mL basta (Pall 1993). Neurospora transformation (Margolin et al. 1997), DNA isolation (Pomraning et al. 2009), protein isolation and Western blotting (Honda and Selker 2008) were performed as previously described. 3χ-FLAG knock-in constructs were made by introduction of linear DNA fragments constructed by overlapping PCR using described plasmid vectors (Honda and Selker 2009) and N. crassa fragments generated using the following primers: H1 CDS FP 5′- GAG GTC GAC GGT ATC GAT AAG CTT AT ATC CAC CGA CAA CAT GTT CGA CTC - 3′; H1 CDS RP 5′ - CCT CCG CCT CCG CCT CCG CCG CCT CCG CCT GCC TTC TCG GCA GCG GGC TC −3′; H1 UTR FP 5′ - TGC TAT ACG AAG TTA TGG ATC CGA GCT CGA CTC GTT CCT TTG GGA TGA T - 3′; H1 UTR RP 5′ - ACC GCG GTG GCG GCC GCT CTA GAA CTA GTT CAT CAA ACC AAA TTC TCG G - 3′. To separate soluble nuclear proteins from the chromatin fraction, cultures were grown overnight and cells were collected, ground in liquid Nitrogen, and resuspended in 1 mL of low salt extraction buffer (50mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.5, 150mM NaCl, 2mM EDTA, plus protease inhibitor tablets (cat # 11836153001; Roche, Indianapolis, IN)). Extracts were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm and the supernatant containing soluble proteins was saved. The pellet was resuspended in 1mL of high salt extraction buffer (50mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.5, 600mM NaCl, 2mM EDTA, plus protease inhibitor tablets (cat # 11836153001; Roche, Indianapolis, IN)) and subjected to sonication. Extracts were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm in a microfuge and the supernatant was saved as the chromatin fraction. Both fractions were analyzed by Western blotting using anti-FLAG antibodies (cat # F1804; Sigma-Aldrich) and anti-H3 antibodies (cat # 06-755 Millipore).

DNA Sequencing and Data Analysis

ChIP-seq

For chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments, 5 ×106 conidia/ml were inoculated into 50 mL of VMM and incubated at 32° for 5 hours. Cells were harvested and ChIP was performed as previously described (Sasaki et al. 2014) using anti-FLAG antibodies (cat # F1804; Sigma-Aldrich) or antibodies to the unphosphorylated C-terminal repeat of RNA polymerase II (8WG16; cat# MMS-126R; Covance). Two biological replicates were performed for each experiment. Libraries were prepared using the TruSeq ChIP sample prep kit (Illumina, cat # IP-202-1012) according to manufacture instructions with the following modification. Library amplification was performed using only 4 cycles of PCR to reduce biased enrichment of GC-rich DNA (Ji et al. 2014). Libraries were sequenced at the University of Georgia Genomics Facility on an Illumina NextSeq 500 instrument. Reads were aligned to version 12 of the N. crassa genome (Refseq Accession # GCF_000182925.2; Galagan et al. (2003)) using the Burrows-Wheeler Alingner (BWA version 0.7.10) (Li and Durbin 2009). To determine if H1-FLAG was enriched over background, coverage was normalized to mi-tochondrial DNA as follows. We used BEDtools (version 2.25.0) ‘coverage’ to calculate read coverage for 1000bp windows across the genome (Quinlan and Hall 2010). We then used BEDtools ‘map’ to calculate the median coverage for mitochondrial DNA. The coverage for each 1000 base pair window was then divided by the median coverage for mitochondrial DNA. As a positive control, data from a previously published ChIP experiment for methylated lysine-9 of H3 was analyzed (Accession #SRX550120; Sasaki et al. 2014).

The Hypergeometric Optimization of Motif EnRichment (HOMER verson 4.7.2) (Heinz et al. 2010) software package (an-notatePeaks.pl module) was used to generate metaplots and heatmaps of enrichment data (using the-hist and-ghist option, respectively). We first created a custom HOMER genome annotation for Neurospora using a fasta file and a GTF file (Supplementary File 2) containing the version 12 genome assemblies and annotations, respectively (Galagan et al. 2003). All plots were centered on transcriptional start sites or transcriptional termination sites and a window size of 10 bp was specified for all histograms (-hist 10). HOMER was also used to construct metaplots of expression-ranked gene groups using the-list option.

MNase digestion

For Micrococcal nuclease (MNase) experiments, 5 ×106 conidia/mL were inoculated into 50 mL of VMM and incubated at 32° for 5 hours. The cell suspension was transferred to a 50mL conical and centrifuged at 1000 × g for five minutes to pellet germinated conidia. Cell pellets were washed with 10mL Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) (Sambrook et al. 1989) and then resuspended in 10mL of PBS containing 1% formaldahyde. The cell suspension was transferred to a 125mL flask and incubated with gentle shaking for 30 minutes at room temperature before the crosslinking agent was quenched by addition of 500μL 2.5M Glycine. The cell suspension was transferred to a 50mL conical tube and germinating conidia were pelleted by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 1000 × g. Cells were washed once in 40mL of PBS and resuspended in 1mL of ice-cold PBS. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 5000 × g, and each cell pellet was resuspended in NPS buffer with Calcium Chloride (50mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, 140mM NaCl, 5mM MgCl2, 1mM CaCl2, 1% Triton-χ 100, 0.1% Deoxycholate, 0.5mM Spermidine, 1mM PMSF plus Roche EDTA-free protease inhibitor tablets [catalog # 05892791001]). Cells were then lysed by gentle sonication using a Branson sonicator with micro tip (Output 2.0, Duty Cycle 80%; 30 1-second pulses). The chromatin fraction was pelleted by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 14,000 × g. The supernatent was discarded and each pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of NPS buffer and transferred to a 15mL conical tube. NPS buffer with Calcium Chloride was added to raise the volume to 6 mL and the chromatin sample was mixed by pipetting. 700 μL aliquots were transferred to 1.5 mL tubes and 2 units of Micrococcal nuclease (cat #2910A; Clonetech) were added to each tube. Individual samples were incubated at 37° for 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 90, or 120 minutes. MNase digestions were stopped by addition of 15μL 0.5M EDTA and 25 μL 4M NaCl and samples were incubated overnight at 65° to reverse cross-links. 6μL RNase A (10mg/ml; Fisher Scientific, cat # BP2529250) was added and samples were incubated for 2 hours at 50°. 6μL of 10% SDS and 10μL Proteinase K (10mg/ml; Fisher Scientific, cat # BP1700) was then added and samples were incubated for 2 hours at 65°. The digested DNA was isolated by phenol-chloroform extraction and precipitated overnight at −20° in ethanol and sodium acetate (Sambrook et al. 1989). Digested DNA was resolved by gel electrophoresis to confirm that digestion was successful.

MNase-seq

We constructed sequencing libraries from mono-nucleosomes generated by 20 or 60 minute MNase digestion. We first performed a gel extraction (Qiagen, cat #28706) of mononucle-somal DNA (~150bp) and constructed libraries using an Illumina TruSeq Sample preparation kit (Illumina) according to manufacture instructions. 50bp paired-end sequencing reads were generated on a Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument at the Oregon State University genomics core facility. Due to a technical problem during the sequencing run, only 44 bp of sequence were obtained for the read 2 sequence. Sequences were mapped to the N. crassa version 12 genome assembly (Galagan et al. 2003) using bowtie2 (version 2.2.3) (Langmead and Salzberg 2012). To analyze the size distributions in wildtype and the hH1 strain, the Picard software package (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard) was used to remove duplicate reads and determine insert size metrics (using ‘CollectInsertSizeMetrics’). HOMER was used to create metaplots of MNase data as described above. In all cases, a window size of 10bp was used (-hist 10). Metaplots depict only plus strand reads (using the ‘-strand +’ option) and thus peaks indicate the left edge of nucleosomes.

RNA-seq

For RNA-seq experiments, 5×106 conidia/mL were inoculated into 50mL of VMM containing 2% glucose and grown for 5 hours at 32°. RNA isolation was performed as described (Bell-pedersen et al. 1996; Schwerdtfeger and Linden 2001) and strand-specific RNA-seq libraries were prepared from 5 μg total RNA. Ribosomal RNAs were depleted using the yeast Ribo-zero kit (cat # MRZY1324 Epicentre) and RNA libraries were generated with the Illumina Stranded RNA-seq kit (cat # RS-122-2101). Reads were aligned to version 12 of the N. crassa genome sequence using TopHat (Trapnell et al. 2009) and expression levels (FPKM) were determined using Cufflinks (Trapnell et al. 2012).

MethylC-seq

For DNA methylation analysis, conidia were inoculated into 5 mL of VMM and cultures were grown for 48 hours. Genomic DNA was isolated using described procedures (Pomran-ing et al. 2009). MethylC-seq libraries were prepared as previously described (Urich et al. 2015). Illumina sequencing was performed at the University of Georgia Genomics Facility using an Illumina NextSeq 500 instrument. Sequencing reads were trimmed for adapters, preprocessed to remove low quality reads and aligned to the N. crassa version 12 genome assembly (Galagan et al. 2003) as described in Schmitz et al. (2013). Mitochondria sequence (which is fully unmethylated) was used as a control to calculate the sodium bisulfite reaction non-conversion rate of unmodified cytosines. Only cytosine sites with a minimum coverage (set as 3) were allowed for subsequent analysis. Binomial test coupled with Benjamini-Hochberg correction was adopted to determine the methylation status of each cytosine. Identification of DMRs (Differentially Methylated Regions) was performed as described (Schultz et al. 2015). Methylated regions in wild type were defined previously (Basenko et al. 2016). For metaplots, both upstream and downstream regions were divided into 20 bins each of 50bp in length for a total 1kb in each direction. Methylated regions were separated every 5%, for a total of 20 bins. Weighted methylation levels were computed for each bin as described previously (Schultz et al. 2012).

Data Availability

All strains are listed in Supplementary File 1 and available upon request. All sequencing data have been deposited into the NCBI SRA/GEO databases. ChIP-seq, MNase-Seq, and RNA-seq data generated during this study have been deposited under accession #GSE78157 (reviewer link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?token=uvqzukkwhtgxfof&acc=GSE78157). Control data from a previously published ChIP-seq experiment for methy-lation of H3 lysine-9 was deposited under accession #SRX550120 (Sasaki et al. 2014). MethylC-seq data are deposited under accession #GSE76982 (this study; reviewer link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?token=edunyawudnqntwr&acc=GSE76982) and #GSE70518 (Basenko et al. 2016).

RESULTS

Construction of an H1-3XFLAG fusion protein

To investigate the role of H1 in N. crassa cells, we constructed an epitope-tagged version of the protein by introducing coding sequence for a 3χ-FLAG tag at the 3′ end of the native hH1 locus (Figure 1A). Primary transformants were crossed to obtain a homokaryon that was analyzed further. To confirm that the H1-3XFLAG fusion protein is functional, we first compared the growth rate of the hH1∷hH1-3xflag-hph strain to wildtype and to an hH1 deletion strain obtained from the Neurospora gene knockout consortium (Colot et al. 2006). The ΔhH1 strain displayed a reduced growth rate, as reported previously for an H1 loss-of-function al-lele generated by repeat-induced point mutation (Folco et al. 2003). The hH1∷hH1-3xflag-hph grew similar to wildtype (Figure 1B and C). We also asked if the H1-3XFLAG protein associates with chromatin. We isolated soluble and chromatin-containing fractions (see Materials and Methods) and performed Western blot analyses using anti-FLAG and anti-H3 antibodies. Western blot probed with an anti-FLAG antibody revealed a single band. The apparent molecular weight was larger than expected based on amino acid sequence prediction, but the apparent size was consistent with previous analysis of N. crassa purified by extraction with perchloric acid (Folco et al. 2003). We detected H1-3XFLAG in both soluble and chromatin fractions with higher levels of H1-3XFLAG observed in the chromatin fraction (Figure 1D). As expected, H3 was exclusively detected in the chromatin fraction. Together, these data demonstrate that the H1-3XFLAG construct is functional and that N. crassa H1 is a component of chromatin.

Figure 1
Figure 1

H1-3XFLAG is functional and binds to chromatin.(A) A cartoon illustrating the strategy for introducing a 3x-flag sequence into the 3’ end of the native hH1 locus by homologous recombination. (B) The linear growth rate of the indicated strains was measured using ‘race tubes’ for three replicates of each strain. The direction of growth is left to right. (C) Quantification of the linear growth rate data from panel B as distance (y-axis; cm) versus time (x-axis; hours). (D) The soluble (Sol) and the chromatin fractions (Chr) were isolated from wildtype and the hH1-3xflag strain and both fractions were analyzed by Western blotting using anti-FLAG and anti-H3 antibodies, as indicated. MW indicates the positions and sizes in kiloDaltons of a prestained protein ladder.

H1 is moderately enriched in promoters and depleted from coding sequences of actively expressed genes

To determine the genome wide distribution of H1-3XFLAG, we performed chromatin-immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq). Inspection of the H1-3XFLAG enrichment data in a genome browser revealed a relatively uniform distribution for all seven chromosomes. Given that high levels of H1-3XFLAG were detected in the chromatin fraction by Western blotting, we reasoned that the uniform enrichment pattern observed for H1-3XFLAG might reflect global binding of H1 across the genome. To determine if this was the case, we normalized read counts obtained for each 1000 base pair window in the nuclear genome to the median read count obtained for all 1000 base pair windows covering the mitochondrial genome. This allowed us to calculate enrichment over background because mitochondrial DNA should not be enriched by immunoprecipitation of a nuclear protein. Data for all 1000 base pair windows on Linkage Group VII demonstrate that H1 is a general chromatin architectural protein in N. crassa ( Figure 2). ChIP-seq experiments using anti-FLAG antibodies led to global enrichment of chromosomal DNA from the hH1-3xflag strain but not from a wildtype negative control strain. As a positive control, we normalized read counts obtained in a previously published ChIP-seq experiment performed with antibodies to H3 methylated at lysine-9 (Sasaki et al. 2014). This confirmed that normalization to mitochondrial DNA is an effective method for quantifying enrichment over background.

Figure 2
Figure 2

H1-3XFLAG is globally enriched throughout the N. crassa genome. Normalized read coverage is shown for all 1000 base pair windows across N. crassa LGVII for anti-FLAG ChIP-seq experiments performed with a wildtype negative control strain (no FLAG protein) and the hH1-3xflag strain (two replicates for each strain are shown). Normalized read coverage is also plotted for an anti-H3K9me3 ChIP-seq experiment performed with wildtype. Each spot depicts the read count for a single 1000bp window normalized to the median enrichment obtained for mitochondrial DNA windows.

We did not detect prominent peaks that are typical of transcription factors or previously analyzed histone modifications such as H3K4me2 or H3K9me3 (Lewis et al. 2009). However, we did detect a subtle enrichment of H1 in the promoters of many genes along with a corresponding depletion of H1-3XFLAG within many coding sequences. To determine if this pattern occurred broadly across the N. crassa chromatin landscape, we created metaplots to analyze the average H1 distribution across the transcriptional start sites (TSS) or transcriptional termination sites (TTS) of all N. crassa genes (Figure 3A).

Figure 3
Figure 3

H1-3XFLAG is depleted from gene bodies and modestly enriched in promoters of expressed genes. (A) Metaplots depict the average ChIP-seq enrichment pattern across all N. crassa genes for two replicate FLAG ChIP-seq experiments performed with the hH1-3xflag-hph+ strain and a wildtype negative control strain (no FLAG-tagged protein). Metaplots are centered on the the transcrip-tional start (TSS; left) or the transcriptional termination site (TTS; right). (B) All N. crassa genes were ranked by expression level and split into quintile groups. Quintile 1 (Q1) corresponds to genes with the highest expression level, whereas Q5 corresponds to genes with the lowest expression. The metaplot depicts the H1-3XFLAG enrichment pattern for each expression group across the TSS or TTS. (C) Heatmaps show the distribution of H1-3XFLAG across all N. crassa genes centered on the TSS (left) or TTS (right). Genes are ordered by expression level from highest to lowest. (D) Heatmaps show the distribution of RNA polymerase II across all N. crassa genes centered on the TSS (left) or TTS (right). Genes are ordered as in C. Data in B-D are from replicate one.

On average, H1-3XFLAG was enriched upstream of the TSS and was depleted from gene bodies. Similar enrichment patterns were observed for both biological replicates, but not in a negative control experiment in which we used anti-FLAG antibodies to perform ChIP-seq in a wildtype strain (no FLAG-tagged protein). We next asked if H1-3XFLAG enrichment was correlated with the level of transcription. We binned Neurospora genes into five groups based on expression level and constructed metaplots to visualize the average H1-3XFLAG distribution pattern for each group. The level of enrichment in gene promoters was positively correlated with the level of transcription (Figure 3B). Similarly, depletion of H1-FLAG from coding regions was correlated with the level of transcription. To explore this further, we performed ChIP-seq for RNA polymerase II and constructed heatmaps of H1-FLAG and RNA polymerase II occupancy across all Neurospora genes ordered by expression level (Figure 3C,D). These data further support the idea that H1-3XFLAG enrichment is highest in the promoters and lowest in the coding sequences of highly expressed genes.

H1 is not a major determinant of nucleosome positioning in N. crassa

Given that H1-3XFLAG displayed a subtle preference for promoters of actively expressed genes, we hypothesized that H1 may impact chromatin structure at promoters. Like many eukaryotes, N. crassa promoters are characterized by nucleosome free regions (NFRs) upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) followed by well positioned “+1” nucleosomes (Sancar et al. 2015). To determine if H1 is important for establishment of this characteristic promoter structure and to determine if N. crassa H1 is important for nucleo-some occupancy or nuclesome positioning at specific sites in the genome, we performed Micrococcal nuclease digestion followed by sequencing (MNase-seq). Nuclei were incubated with MNase for increasing times (up to 60 minutes) before the DNA from each digestion reaction was purified and resolved on an agarose gel. In agreement with previously published work (Folco et al. 2003), wild-type and ΔhH1 showed similar global MNase sensitivity across multiple experiments (representative gels are shown in Figure 4A and B). We next performed gel extractions to isolate the DNA band corresponding to mononucleosomes (~150 base pairs) from samples digested with MNase for 20 or 60 minutes and constructed Illumina sequencing libraries. For each digestion time, libraries were prepared from two independent biological replicates (four samples total for each strain) and paired-end sequencing was performed. We observed no differences in the average length of the mononucleosomal fragments in wildtype and ΔhH1 (Table 1). As expected, longer digestion times produced shorter DNA fragments (compare 20 minute to 60 minute digestion times).

Figure 4
Figure 4

H1 is not a major determinant of nucleosome size or positioning in Neurospora. (A) Wildtype or (B) ΔhH1 nuclei were isolated and treated with Micrococcal nuclease (MNase) for the indicated times (minutes). DNA was purified, resolved on an agarose gel, and visualized by staining with Ethidium Bromide. Wildtype and ΔhH1 display similar digestion kinetics. (C) Metaplots depict the average sequencing depth on the + strand across all N. crassa genes obtained by sequencing mononucleosomal DNA from a 60 minute MNase digest. Plots show data from two biological replicates each for wildtype and ΔhH1. (D - H) All N. crassa genes were ranked by expression level and split into quintile groups, ranging from highest expression (Quintile 1) to lowest expression (Quintile 5). Metaplots depict the average sequencing coverage on the + strand for each group. Plots show data from two biological replicates each for wildtype and ΔhH1. The legend in the top right panel corresponds to plots (C - H). For all plots, the coverage of + strand reads from an H1-3XFLAG ChIP-seq experiment is shown as a dashed line.

View this table:
Table 1

Paired-end read insert size

We next asked if H1 impacted the occupancy and/or positioning of nucleosomes in promoters or gene coding sequences. We created metaplots to analyze the average nucleosome distribution across all N. crassa genes (Figure 4C). In this case, only plus strand reads were plotted to generate peaks corresponding to the edge of each nucleosome. The average gene profile revealed a characteristic nucleosome free region upstream of the TSS, as reported previously for N. crassa (Sancar et al. 2015). The average nucleo-some position profiles were similar in wildtype and ΔhH1. Because H1 was most enriched in the promoters of highly expressed genes, we next plotted average MNase-seq enrichment profiles for genes grouped by expression level. Although we detected a subtle increase in the size of the NFR from the most expressed genes in the two 60 minute digestion samples, this difference was not ap-parent in the samples subjected to a 20 minute MNase digestion (Figure S1). The difference was also not apparent in a third independent replicate subjected to single-end Illumina sequencing (Figure S1). Thus, we conclude that H1 is not a major determinant of nucleosome positioning or occupancy in Neurospora. Because it appeared that enrichment of H1-3XFLAG was inversely correlated with nucleosome occupancy, we plotted plus strand reads from replicate one of the H1-3XFLAG ChIP-seq experiment described above to allow direct comparison of nucleosome occupancy and H1-3XFLAG enrichment (Figure 4C - H). This confirmed that the highest levels of H1 enrichment correspond to sites with the lowest nucleosome occupancy, raising the possibility that H1-3XFLAG binds to DNA that is free of nucleosomes as well as to nucleosomal DNA in N. crassa.

ΔhH1 exhibits increased DNA methylation in N. crassa hete-rochromatin domains

H1 impacts DNA methylation levels in animals (Fan et al. 2005a; Zhang et al. 2012a), plants (Wierzbicki and Jerzmanowski 2005; Zemach et al. 2013; Rea et al. 2012), and the fungus Ascobolus im-mersus (Barra et al. 2000). It was previously reported that H1 did not impact DNA methylation in N. crassa (Folco et al. 2003); however, Folco and colleagues analyzed only a single methylated region. It remained possible that H1 impacts DNA methylation in a region-specific manner or alternatively, that H1 has subtle impact on DNA methylation that may have been overlooked. We performed MethylC-seq to analyze DNA methylation across the entire genome at single base-pair resolution. Genomic DNA was isolated from two replicates each of a wildtype mat A strain, the ΔhH1 mutant, and a negative control Δdim-2 strain, which lacks DNA methylation altogether (Kouzminova and Selker 2001). All strains were grown simultaneously, but the wildtype and Δdim-2 data were published previously as part of another study (Basenko et al. 2016).

To determine if H1 impacts the level or distribution of DNA methylation in N. crassa, we first plotted DNA methylation levels across Linkage Group VII, a 4Mb chromosome corresponding to ~10% of the genome. The overall pattern of DNA methylation was similar in wildtype and the ΔhH1 strain. However, we noted that DNA methylation levels were higher in the ΔhH1 mutant at most regions along the chromosome (Figure 5A). We next constructed metaplots to quantify the average methylation level for all genomic regions that are normally methylated in the wildtype mat A strain (see Materials and Methods). Both ΔhH1 replicates displayed higher average DNA methylation levels when compared to the wildtype strain (Figure 5B). To confirm that this wasn’t an artifact due to differences in strain backgrounds, we compared the level of methylation in the ΔhH1 strain to a wildtype mat a strain and we analyzed DNA methylation levels in a second hH1 loss of function strain in which the hH1 gene was inactivated by repeat-induced point mutation (Folco et al. 2003). In both cases, the level of DNA methylation was higher in the hH1 mutant strains (Figure 5C,D). A search for differentially methylated regions between wildtype and ΔH1 identified only a single methylated region that was specific to the ΔH1 strain (Linkage Group VI; 309590 - 319133). This hyper-methylated sequence corresponds to Sly1-1, a DNA transposon found in the genomes of some N. crassa isolates (Wang et al. 2015).

Figure 5
Figure 5

Increased DNA methylation is observed at most N. crassa heterochromatin domains in H1-deficient strains. (A) The DNA methylation level (weighted DNA methylation level (%); see Materials and Methods) is shown for 10 Kb windows across N. crassa Linkage Group VII for wildtype, the ΔhH1 mutant, and the Δdim-2 strain, which lacks all DNA methylation. (B-D) The metaplots show the average DNA methylation level across all previously identified wildtype methylated domains: (B) the wildtype mat A strain and the ΔhH1 strain; (C) the wildtype mat a strain and the ΔhH1 strain; and (D) the wildtype mat A strain and the hH1RIP2 strain. Data for at least two independent biological replicates of each strain are shown. (E) More cytosines are methylated in ΔhH1. The plot shows the total number of methylated cytosines (see Materials and Methods) identified in each wildtype and ΔhH1 replicate. (F) The level of methylation at individual cytosines is higher in ΔhH1. The percentage of total shared methylated sites (y-axis) versus the level of methylation at individual cytosines (x-axis) is shown.

Higher methylation levels can result when individual cytosines are methylated at a higher frequency in a population of nuclei or when new cytosines become methylated (or a combination of both). To determine which of these possibilities was the case in H1-deficient strains, we determined the number of methylated cytosines in wildtype and ΔhH1 using a binomial test in combination with multiple testing correction (see Materials and Methods). The number of methylated cytosines increased by ~25% in the ΔH1 strain. We next compared methylation frequency at cytosines that were scored as methylated in both strains. This revealed that shared sites are methylated at higher frequency in nuclei from the ΔhH1 strain. Thus, loss of H1 leads to a subtle, but global increase in DNA methylation at relics of repeat-induced point mutation.

DISCUSSION

We applied genomic and molecular methods to investigate H1 in the model fungus N. crassa. We first confirmed that Neurospora H1 is a chromatin component by constructing a functional epitope-tagged H1 fusion protein and analyzing its localization in cell fractionation and ChIP-seq experiments. This revealed that H1 is globally enriched throughout the genome, occupying both hete-rochromatic and euchromatic regions. Surprisingly, we observed the highest enrichment of H1-3XFLAG in promoters of expressed genes. Although the overall amplitude of enrichment was low, preferential enrichment of H1-3XFLAG was clearly correlated with expression level. These results may indicate that H1 plays different roles in fungi and animals. In mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs), H1c and H1d are depleted from strong promoters and enhancers (Cao et al. 2013). It should be noted that H1 protein levels are significantly reduced in ESCs compared to differentiated cells (Fan et al. 2003), which might explain why H1c and H1d are not detected at ESC promoters. This seems unlikely, however, as ChIP-seq analyis of H1b from ESCs and from differentiated cells revealed that this protein was similarly enriched at repressed genes and depleted from active promoters (Li et al. 2012a). On the other hand, given that mammals encode multiple H1 variants it is possible that certain H1 variants will bind preferentially to nucleosome-depleted promoter regions, similar to the case for Neurospora H1. Indeed, analysis of H1 variants by DamID showed that H1.1 exhibits a distinct localization compared to other histones and is not excluded from promoters like the other somatic H1 variants (Izzo et al. 2013). Similarly, the more divergent H1.X variant was recently found to be enriched at regions with high RNA polymerase II occupancy (Mayor et al. 2015), suggesting that these H1 variants may play roles within active chromatin in higher eukaryotes. Additional work to define the specific roles of linker histones in fungal and animals systems is needed to determine their specific functions at open chromatin.

One possibility is that N. crassa H1 functions more like animal HMG (High Mobility group) proteins. The chromatin architectural protein HMGD1 is enriched in active chromatin, for example (Nalabothula et al. 2014), similar to the results obtained for H1-3XFLAG here. It is important to note that we can not rule out the possibility that the subtle promoter enrichment observed for H1-FLAG is an experimental artifact. This could be the case if the basic H1 protein interacts non-specifically with DNA sequences originating from open chromatin during the ChIP procedure. It was shown that certain highly expressed loci in yeast are prone to artifactual enrichment in ChIP-chip experiments for reasons that are not understood (Teytelman et al. 2013). However, we do not think this is the case here because the non-specific enrichment patterns observed in yeast are qualitatively different than the enrichment patterns we observe for H1-3XFLAG. Thus, it is likely that the patterns observed here reflect the in vivo occupancy of H1. It will be interesting to determine if promoter regions interact with a sub-population of H1 in which specific residues are post-translationally modified. It will also be interesting to determine if depletion of H1 from coding sequences of expressed genes depends on post-translational modification. This seems likely given that H1 proteins in plants and animals are extensively modified, much like the core histones (Harshman et al. 2013; Bednar et al. 2015; Annalisa and Robert 2015; Kotliński et al. 2016). Moreover, it was shown that phosphorylation of H1 was linked to transcription by RNA polymerase I and II in humans (Zheng et al. 2010). An important goal for future studies will be to determine if N. crassa H1 is post-translationally modified and to determine if different forms of H1 exhibit distinct localization and/or distinct functions.

We found here that deletion of hH1 from N. crassa did not substantially alter global MNase accessibility or nucleosome positioning. Moreover, H1 did not impact the size of protected DNA fragments produced by MNase treatment or the distance between adjacent nucleosomes in genes. These results point to clear differences in how H1 interacts with chromatin in N. crassa and in animals. Indeed, H1 depletion caused increased MNase accessibility, altered nucleosome spacing lengths, and reduced chromatin compaction in H1 triple-knockout ESCs (Fan et al. 2005b). Our results could indicate that N. crassa H1 does not bind to the linker DNA and the dyad axis of the NCP as demonstrated for animal H1 (Bednar et al. 2015). Another possibility is that N. crassa H1 is more dynamic than H1 in higher eukaryotes. FRAP studies revealed that mammalian H1 variants exist in high-mobility and low-mobility pools and that the half-life of fluorescence recovery after H1-GFP bleaching was significantly shorter than for the core histones (Mis-teli et al. 2000; Lever et al. 2000). Interactions between H1 and the NCP may be even more transient in N. crassa such that H1 does not interfere with MNase digestion even though it interacts with the same region of the nucleosome protected by animal H1.

We found increased DNA methylation in H1-deficient cells of N. crassa. H1 effects DNA methylation in both A. thaliana and animal cells, but the relationship between H1 and DNA methylation is different in these systems. In animals, H1 variants promote repressive modifications, including DNA methylation in mammals (Yang et al. 2013) and H3K9me2 in both mammals and Drosophila (Li et al. 2012a; Lu et al. 2013). The observation that H1-deficient cells exhibit hypermethylation demonstrates that N. crassa H1 is not required to promote DNA methylation or H3K9 methylation, which directs DNA methylation in Neurospora (Tamaru and Selker 2001). Similar hypermethyaltion was reported in A. immersus (Barra et al. 2000). Moreover, the DNA methylation phenotypes of N. crassa and A. immersus are reminiscent of A. thaliana H1 depletion lines, where a global increase in DNA methylation was observed in heterochromatin domains along with loss of DNA methyltion in euchromatic transposon sequences (Wierzbicki and Jerzmanowski 2005; Zemach et al. 2013). These results indicate that H1 can limit DNA methylation in plants and fungi. Indeed, depletion of A. thaliana H1 rescued the reduced DNA methylation phenotype of ddm1 plants, leading to the conclusion that DDM1 promotes DNA methyaltion by removal of H1. This may indicate that H1 evolved a new function to promote heterochromatic modifications in the animal lineage.

It is possible that N. crassa H1 limits access of the DNA methyl-transferase DIM-2 or the H3K9 MTase DIM-5KMT1. A recent study showed that binding of H1 to the NCP limited the dynamics and modifiability of the H3 tail in vitro (Stützer et al. 2016), consistent with this possibility. In addition, increased accessibility of the DIM-2 DNA methyltransferase was linked to hypermethylation in the N. crassa histone deacetylase-1-deficient strain (Honda et al. 2012). On the other hand, in A. thaliana H1 was required for imprinting of the MEDEA locus, which involves active removal of methyl cytosine bases by DNA glycosylases (Rea et al. 2012). A mechanism for DNA demethylation has not been described in N. crassa, but it is possible that H1 promotes removal of methylated cytosines in heterochromatin domains. Additional studies are needed to understand exactly how H1 impacts DNA methylation levels in N. crassa. Overall, this work adds to the diverse set of phenotypes that have been reported following depletion of H1 in plants, animals, and fungi. Future work to investigate H1 in fungal systems is likely to yield new insights into the evolution and the functions of this important group of proteins.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Cameron Prybol for technical contributions to the project. This work was funded by a grant from the American Cancer Society to ZAL (RSG-14-184-01-DMC), a grant from the National Institutes of Health to RJS (R00GM100000), and a grant to XZ from the National Science Foundation (#0960425).

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 zlewis{at}uga.edu

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    Annalisa, I. and S. Robert, 2015 The role of linker histone h1 modifications in the regulation of gene expression and chromatin dynamics. Biochimica et biophysica acta.
  2. ↵
    Baldwin, J. P., P. G. Boseley, E. M. Bradbury and K. Ibel, 1975 The subunit structure of the eukaryotic chromosome. Nature 253: 245–249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Barra, J. L., L. Rhounim, J. L. Rossignol, and G. Faugeron, 2000 Histone h1 is dispensable for methylation-associated gene silencing in ascobolus immersus and essential for long life span. Molecular and cellular biology 20: 61–69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Basenko, E. Y., M. Kamei, L. Ji, R. J. Schmitz, and Z. A. Lewis, 2016 The lsh/ddm1 homolog mus-30 is required for genome stability, but not for dna methylation in neurospora crassa. PLoS genetics 12: e1005790.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    Bednar, J., A. Hamiche, and S. Dimitrov, 2015 H1-nucleosome interactions and their functional implications. Biochimica et bio-physica acta.
  6. ↵
    Bell-pedersen, D., J. A. Y. C. Dunlap, and J. J. Loros, 1996 Distinct cis-acting elements mediate clock, light, and developmental regulation of the neurospora crassa eas (ccg-2) gene. Mol Cell Biol 16: 513–521.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Cao, K., N. Lailler, Y. Zhang, A. Kumar, K. Uppal, Z. Liu, E. K. Lee, H. Wu, M. Medrzycki, C. Pan, P.-Y. Ho, G. P. Cooper, X. Dong, C. Bock, E. E. Bouhassira, and Y. Fan, 2013 High-resolution mapping of h1 linker histone variants in embryonic stem cells. PLoS genetics 9: e1003417.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Cerf, C., G. Lippens, S. Muyldermans, A. Segers, V. Ramakrishnan, S. J. Wodak, K. Hallenga, and L. Wyns, 1993 Homo-and het-eronuclear two-dimensional nmr studies of the globular domain of histone h1: sequential assignment and secondary structure. Biochemistry 32: 11345–11351.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Colot, H. V., G. Park, G. E. Turner, C. Ringelberg, C. M. Crew, L. Litvinkova, R. L. Weiss, K. A. Borkovich and J. C. Dun-lap, 2006 A high-throughput gene knockout procedure for neu-rospora reveals functions for multiple transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 10352–10357.
  10. ↵
    Davis, R. H., M. B. Lawless, and L. A. Port, 1970 Arginaseless neurospora: genetics, physiology, and polyamine synthesis. J Bacteriol 102: 299–305.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Downs, J. a., E. Kosmidou, A. Morgan, and S. P. Jackson, 2003 Suppression of homologous recombination by the saccharomyces cerevisiae linker histone. Molecular cell 11: 1685–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Fan, T., J. P. Hagan, S. V. Kozlov C. L. Stewart, and K. Muegge, 2005a Lsh controls silencing of the imprinted cdkn1c gene. Development 132: 635–644.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Fan, Y., T. Nikitina, E. M. Morin-Kensicki, J. Zhao, T. R. Magnuson, C. L. Woodcock and A. I. Skoultchi, 2003 H1 linker histones are essential for mouse development and affect nucleosome spacing in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 23: 4559–4572.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Fan, Y., T. Nikitina, J. Zhao, T. J. Fleury, R. Bhattacharyya, E. E. Bouhassira, A. Stein, C. L. Woodcock, and A. I. Skoultchi, 2005b Histone h1 depletion in mammals alters global chromatin structure but causes specific changes in gene regulation. Cell 123: 1199–212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Fan, Y., A. Sirotkin, R. G. Russell, J. Ayala, and A. I. Skoultchi, 2001 Individual somatic h1 subtypes are dispensable for mouse development even in mice lacking the h1(0) replacement subtype. Molecular and cellular biology 21: 7933–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Folco, H. D., M. Freitag, A. Ramon, E. D. Temporini, M. E. Alvarez I. Garcia, C. Scazzocchio, E. U. Selker, and A. L. Rosa, 2003 Histone h1 is required for proper regulation of pyruvate decarboxylase gene expression in neurospora crassa. Eukaryotic cell 2: 341–350.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Galagan, J. E., S. E. Calvo, K. a. Borkovich E. U. Selker, N. D. Read D. Jaffe, W. FitzHugh, L.-J. Ma, S. Smirnov, S. Purcell, B. Rehman, T. Elkins, R. Engels, S. Wang, C. B. Nielsen, J. Butler, M. Endrizzi, D. Qui, P. Ianakiev, D. Bell-Pedersen, M. A. Nelson, M. Werner-Washburne, C. P. Selitrennikoff, J. a. Kin-sey, E. L. Braun, A. Zelter, U. Schulte, G. O. Kothe, G. Jedd, W. Mewes, C. Staben, E. Marcotte, D. Greenberg, A. Roy, K. Foley, J. Naylor, N. Stange-Thomann, R. Barrett, S. Gnerre, M. Kamal, M. Kamvysselis, E. Mauceli, C. Bielke, S. Rudd, D. Frishman, S. Krystofova, C. Rasmussen, R. L. Metzenberg, D. D. Perkins S. Kroken, C. Cogoni, G. Macino, D. Catcheside, W. Li, R. J. Pratt, S. a. Osmani C. P. C. DeSouza, L. Glass, M. J. Orbach, J. A. Berglund R. Voelker, O. Yarden, M. Plamann, S. Seiler, J. Dunlap, A. Radford, R. Aramayo, D. O. Natvig, L. a. Alex G. Mannhaupt, D. J. Ebbole, M. Freitag, I. Paulsen, M. S. Sachs, E. S. Lander C. Nusbaum, and B. Birren, 2003 The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus neurospora crassa. Nature 422: 859–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Geeven, G., Y. Zhu, B. Kim, B. Bartholdy, S.-M. Yang, T. Macfar-lan, W. Gifford, S. Pfaff, M. Verstegen, H. Pinto, M. Vermunt, M. Creyghton, P. Wijchers, J. Stamatoyannopoulos, A. Skoultchi, and W. de Laat, 2015 Local compartment changes and regulatory landscape alterations in histone h1-depleted cells. Genome Biol 16: 289.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Harshman, S. W., N. L. Young, M. R. Parthun and M. A. Freitas, 2013 H1 histones: Current perspectives and challenges.
  20. ↵
    Heinz, S., C. Benner, N. Spann, E. Bertolino, Y. C. Lin, P. Laslo, J. X. Cheng, C. Murre, H. Singh, and C. K. Glass, 2010 Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and b cell identities. Mol Cell 38: 576–589.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Honda, S., Z. a. Lewis, K. Shimada, W. Fischle, R. Sack, and E. U. Selker, 2012 Heterochromatin protein 1 forms distinct complexes to direct histone deacetylation and dna methylation. Nature structural & molecular biology 9.
  22. ↵
    Honda, S. and E. U. Selker, 2008 Direct interaction between dna methyltransferase dim-2 and hp1 is required for dna methylation in neurospora crassa. Molecular and cellular biology 28: 6044–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Honda, S. and E. U. Selker, 2009 Tools for fungal proteomics: multifunctional neurospora vectors for gene replacement, protein expression and protein purification. Genetics 182: 11–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Izzo, A., K. Kamieniarz-Gdula, F. Ramírez, N. Noureen, J. Kind, T. Manke, B. vanSteensel, and R. Schneider, 2013 The genomic landscape of the somatic linker histone subtypes h1.1 to h1.5 in human cells. Cell Reports 3: 2142–2154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Ji, L., T. Sasaki, X. Sun, P. Ma, Z. A. Lewis, and R. J. Schmitz, 2014 Methylated dna is over-represented in whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data. Front Genet 5: 341.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Kasinsky, H. E., J. D. Lewis, J. B. Dacks and J. Ausió, 2001 Origin of h1 linker histones. The FASEB journal 15: 34–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Kornberg, R. D. and J. O. Thomas, 1974 Chromatin structure; oligomers of the histones. Science 184: 865–868.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Kotliński, M., K. Rutowicz, L. Kniźewski, A. Palusiński, J. Oleędzki, A. Fogtman, T. Rubel, M. Koblowska, M. Dadlez, K. Ginalski, and A. Jerzmanowski, 2016 Histone h1 variants in arabidopsis are subject to numerous post-translational modifications, both conserved and previously unknown in histones, suggesting complex functions of h1 in plants. PloS one 11: e0147908.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Kouzminova, E. and E. U. Selker, 2001 Dim-2 encodes a dna methyltransferase responsible for all known cytosine methy-lation in neurospora. EMBO Journal 20: 4309–4323.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Langmead, B. and S. L. Salzberg, 2012 Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9: 357–359.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Lever, M. a., J. P. Th’ng, X. Sun, and M. J. Hendzel, 2000 Rapid exchange of histone h1.1 on chromatin in living human cells. Nature 408: 873–876.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    Levy, A., M. Eyal, G. Hershkovits, M. Salmon-Divon, M. Klutstein, and D. J. Katcoff, 2008 Yeast linker histone hho1p is required for efficient rna polymerase i processivity and transcriptional silencing at the ribosomal dna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 11703–8.
  33. ↵
    Lewis, Z. a., S. Honda, T. K. Khlafallah, J. K. Jeffress M. Freitag, F. Mohn, D. Schübeler, and E. U. Selker, 2009 Relics of repeat-induced point mutation direct heterochromatin formation in neurospora crassa. Genome research 19: 427–37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Li, C., J. E. Mueller, M. Elfline, and M. Bryk, 2008 Linker histone h1 represses recombination at the ribosomal dna locus in the budding yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular microbiology 67: 906–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    Li, H. and R. Durbin, 2009 Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754–1760.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Li, J.-Y., M. Patterson, H. K. A. Mikkola, W. E. Lowry and S. K. Kurdistani, 2012a Dynamic distribution of linker histone h1.5 in cellular differentiation. PLoS genetics 8: e1002879.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Li, X., K. Liu, F. Li, J. Wang, H. Huang, J. Wu, and Y. Shi, 2012b Structure of c-terminal tandem brct repeats of rtt107 protein reveals critical role in interaction with phosphorylated histone h2a during dna damage repair. J Biol Chem 287: 9137–9146.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Lu, X., S. N. Wontakal, H. Kavi, B. J. Kim, P. M. Guzzardo A. V. Emelyanov, N. Xu, G. J. Hannon, J. Zavadil, D. V. Fyodorov, and A. I. Skoultchi, 2013 Drosophila h1 regulates the genetic activity of heterochromatin by recruitment of su(var)3-9. Science (New York, N.Y.) 340: 78–81.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Luger, K., a. W. Mäder, R. K. Richmond, D. F. Sargent and T. J. Richmond, 1997 Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 a resolution. Nature 389: 251–260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    Margolin, B. S., M. Freitag, and E. U. Selker, 1997 Improved plas-mids for gene targeting at the his-3 locus of neurospora crassa by electroporation. Fungal Genetics Newsletter 44: 34–36.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    Mayor, R., A. Izquierdo-Bouldstridge, L. Mill??n-Ari??o, A. Bustil-los, C. Sampaio, N. Luque, and A. Jordan, 2015 Genome distribution of replication-independent histone h1 variants shows h1.0 associated with nucleolar domains and h1x associated with rna polymerase ii-enriched regions. Journal of Biological Chemistry 290: 7474–7491.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    McCluskey, K., A. Wiest, and M. Plamann, 2010 The fungal genetics stock center: a repository for 50 years of fungal genetics research. J Biosci 35: 119–126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    Misteli, T., a. Gunjan, R. Hock, M. Bustin, and D. T. Brown, 2000 Dynamic binding of histone h1 to chromatin in living cells. Nature 408: 877–881.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    Nalabothula, N., G. McVicker, J. Maiorano, R. Martin, J. K. Pritchard, and Y. N. Fondufe-Mittendorf, 2014 The chromatin architectural proteins hmgd1 and h1 bind reciprocally and have opposite effects on chromatin structure and gene regulation. BMC genomics 15: 92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Noll, M. and R. D. Kornberg, 1977 Action of micrococcal nuclease on chromatin and the location of histone h1. Journal of molecular biology 109: 393–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    Olins, A. L. and D. E. Olins, 1974 Spheroid chromatin units (v bodies). Science (New York, N.Y.) 183: 330–332.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Pall, M. L., 1993 The use of ignite (basta; glufosinate; phos-phinothricin) to select transformants of bar-containing plasmids in neurospora crassa. Fungal Genetics Newsletter 40: 58.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    Pan, C. and Y. Fan, 2015 Role of h1 linker histones in mammalian development and stem cell differentiation. Biochimica et Bio-physica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms.
  49. ↵
    Patterton, H. G., C. C. Landel, D. Landsman, C. L. Peterson, and R. T. Simpson, 1998 The biochemical and phenotypic characterization of hho1p, the putative linker histone h1 of saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273: 7268–7276.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Pomraning, K. R., K. M. Smith, and M. Freitag, 2009 Genome-wide high throughput analysis of dna methylation in eukaryotes. Methods (San Diego, Calif.) 47: 142–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    Quinlan, A. R. and I. M. Hall, 2010 Bedtools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26: 841–842.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    Ramakrishnan, V., J. T. Finch, V. Graziano, P. L. Lee, and R. M. Sweet, 1993 Crystal structure of globular domain of histone h5 and its implications for nucleosome binding. Nature 362: 219–223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    Ramón, a., M. I. Muro-Pastor, C. Scazzocchio, and R. Gonzalez, 2000 Deletion of the unique gene encoding a typical histone h1 has no apparent phenotype in aspergillus nidulans. Molecular microbiology 35: 223–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    Rea, M., W. Zheng, M. Chen, C. Braud, D. Bhangu, T. N. Rog-nan, and W. Xiao, 2012 Histone h1 affects gene imprinting and dna methylation in arabidopsis. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology 71: 776–86.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis, 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor laboratory press.
  56. ↵
    Sancar, C., N. Ha, R. Yilmaz, R. Tesorero, T. Fisher, M. Brunner, and G. Sancar, 2015 Combinatorial control of light induced chromatin remodeling and gene activation in neurospora. PLoS genetics 11: e1005105.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    Sasaki, T., K. L. Lynch, C. V. Mueller S. Friedman, M. Freitag, and Z. A. Lewis, 2014 Heterochromatin controls gammah2a localization in neurospora crassa. Eukaryot Cell 13: 990–1000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    Schäfer, G., C. R. E. McEvoy, and H.-G. Patterton, 2008 The sac-charomyces cerevisiae linker histone hho1p is essential for chro-matin compaction in stationary phase and is displaced by transcription. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences (Of The United States Of America) 105: 14838–14843.
  59. ↵
    Schmitz, R. J., Y. He, O. Valdes-Lopez, S. M. Khan, T. Joshi, M. A. Urich, J. R. Nery B. Diers, D. Xu, G. Stacey, and J. R. Ecker, 2013 Epigenome-wide inheritance of cytosine methylation variants in a recombinant inbred population. Genome Res 23: 1663–1674.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    Schultz, M. D., Y. He, J. W. Whitaker, M. Hariharan, E. A. Mukamel, D. Leung, N. Rajagopal, J. R. Nery, M. A. Urich H. Chen, S. Lin, Y. Lin, I. Jung, A. D. Schmitt, S. Selvaraj, B. Ren, T. J. Sejnowski, W. Wang, and J. R. Ecker, 2015 Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical dna methylation variation. Nature.
  61. ↵
    Schultz, M. D., R. J. Schmitz, and J. R. Ecker, 2012 ‘leveling’ the playing field for analyses of single-base resolution dna methy-lomes. Trends Genet 28: 583–585.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    Schwerdtfeger, C. and H. Linden, 2001 Blue light adaptation and desensitization of light signal transduction in neurospora crassa. Molecular Microbiology 39: 1080–1087.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    Shaw, B. R., T. M. Herman, R. T. Kovacic G. S. Beaudreau, and K. E. Van Holde, 1976 Analysis of subunit organization in chicken erythrocyte chromatin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 73: 505–9.
  64. ↵
    Shen, X. and M. Gorovsky, 1996 Linker histone h1 regulates specific gene expression but not global transcription in vivo. Cell 86: 475–483.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    Shen, X., L. Yu, J. W. Weir, and M. a. Gorovsky, 1995 Linker histones are not essential and affect chromatin condensation in vivo. Cell 82: 47–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    Stützer, A., S. Liokatis, A. Kiesel, D. Schwarzer, R. Sprangers, J. Söd-ing, P. Selenko, and W. Fischle, 2016 Modulations of dna contacts by linker histones and post-translational modifications determine the mobility and modifiability of nucleosomal h3 tails. Molecular Cell 61: 247–259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    Tamaru, H. and E. U. Selker, 2001 A histone h3 methyltransferase controls dna methylation in neurospora crassa. Nature 414: 277–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. ↵
    Teytelman, L., D. M. Thurtle, J. Rine, and A. van Oudenaarden, 2013 Highly expressed loci are vulnerable to misleading chip localization of multiple unrelated proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 18602–7.
  69. ↵
    Trapnell, C., L. Pachter, and S. L. Salzberg, 2009 Tophat: discovering splice junctions with rna-seq. Bioinformatics 25: 1105–1111.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. ↵
    Trapnell, C., A. Roberts, L. Goff, G. Pertea, D. Kim, D. R. Kelley, H. Pimentel, S. L. Salzberg, J. L. Rinn and L. Pachter, 2012 Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of rna-seq experiments with tophat and cufflinks. Nat Protoc 7: 562–578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    Urich, M. A., J. R. Nery, R. Lister, R. J. Schmitz, and J. R. Ecker, 2015 Methylc-seq library preparation for base-resolution whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Nat Protoc 10: 475–483.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    Wang, Y., K. M. Smith, J. W. Taylor M. Freitag, and J. E. Stajich, 2015 Endogenous small rna mediates meiotic silencing of a novel dna transposon. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) 5: 1949–60.
  73. ↵
    Whitlock, J. P. and R. T. Simpson, 1976 Removal of histone h1 exposes a fifty base pair dna segment between nucleosomes. Biochemistry 15: 3307–3314.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  74. ↵
    Wierzbicki, A. T. and A. Jerzmanowski, 2005 Suppression of his-tone h1 genes in arabidopsis results in heritable developmental defects and stochastic changes in dna methylation. Genetics 169: 997–1008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    Yang, S.-M., B. J. Kim, L. Norwood Toro, and A. I. Skoultchi, 2013 H1 linker histone promotes epigenetic silencing by regulating both dna methylation and histone h3 methylation. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences (Of The United States Of America) 110: 1708–1713.
  76. ↵
    Zemach, A., M. Y. Kim, P.-H. Hsieh, D. Coleman-Derr, L. Eshed-Williams, K. Thao, S. L. Harmer, and D. Zilberman, 2013 The arabidopsis nucleosome remodeler ddm1 allows dna methyl-transferases to access h1-containing heterochromatin. Cell 153: 193–205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  77. ↵
    Zhang, Y., M. Cooke, S. Panjwani, K. Cao, B. Krauth, P. Y. Ho, M. Medrzycki, D. T. Berhe, C. Pan, T. C. McDevitt, and Y. Fan, 2012a Histone h1 depletion impairs embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS Genet 8: e1002691.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    Zhang, Y., Z. Liu, M. Medrzycki, K. Cao, and Y. Fan, 2012b Reduction of hox gene expression by histone h1 depletion. PLoS ONE 7.
  79. ↵
    Zheng, Y., S. John, J. J. Pesavento, J. R. Schultz-Norton, R. L. Schiltz, S. Baek, A. M. Nardulli, G. L. Hager N. L. Kelleher, and C. A. Mizzen, 2010 Histone h1 phosphorylation is associated with transcription by rna polymerases i and ii. Journal of Cell Biology 189: 407–415.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Posted February 25, 2016.
Download PDF
Email
Histone H1 limits DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa
Michael Seymour, Lexiang Ji, Alex M. Santos, Masayuki Kamei, Takahiko Sasaki, Evelina Y. Basenko, Robert J. Schmitz, Xiaoyu Zhang, Zachary A. Lewis
bioRxiv 041285; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/041285
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area