Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
Confirmatory Results

Does the choice of nucleotide substitution models matter topologically?

Michael Hoff, Stefan Orf, Benedikt Riehm, Diego Darriba, Alexandros Stamatakis
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/041566
Michael Hoff
1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Department of Informatics, Kaiserstraße 12, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Orf
1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Department of Informatics, Kaiserstraße 12, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benedikt Riehm
1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Department of Informatics, Kaiserstraße 12, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diego Darriba
2The Exelixis Lab, Scientific Computing Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Schloss-Wolfsbrunnenweg 35, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandros Stamatakis
1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Department of Informatics, Kaiserstraße 12, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany
2The Exelixis Lab, Scientific Computing Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Schloss-Wolfsbrunnenweg 35, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Alexandros.Stamatakis@h-its.org
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Article Information

doi 
https://doi.org/10.1101/041566
History 
  • February 26, 2016.
Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.

Author Information

  1. Michael Hoff1†,
  2. Stefan Orf1†,
  3. Benedikt Riehm1†,
  4. Diego Darriba2 and
  5. Alexandros Stamatakis1,2,*
  1. 1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Department of Informatics, Kaiserstraße 12, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany
  2. 2The Exelixis Lab, Scientific Computing Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Schloss-Wolfsbrunnenweg 35, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany
  1. ↵*Correspondence: Alexandros.Stamatakis{at}h-its.org
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 26, 2016.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does the choice of nucleotide substitution models matter topologically?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Does the choice of nucleotide substitution models matter topologically?
Michael Hoff, Stefan Orf, Benedikt Riehm, Diego Darriba, Alexandros Stamatakis
bioRxiv 041566; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/041566
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Does the choice of nucleotide substitution models matter topologically?
Michael Hoff, Stefan Orf, Benedikt Riehm, Diego Darriba, Alexandros Stamatakis
bioRxiv 041566; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/041566

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3697)
  • Biochemistry (7801)
  • Bioengineering (5686)
  • Bioinformatics (21316)
  • Biophysics (10592)
  • Cancer Biology (8193)
  • Cell Biology (11954)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6772)
  • Ecology (10411)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13890)
  • Genetics (9719)
  • Genomics (13083)
  • Immunology (8158)
  • Microbiology (20037)
  • Molecular Biology (7865)
  • Neuroscience (43116)
  • Paleontology (321)
  • Pathology (1279)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2264)
  • Physiology (3358)
  • Plant Biology (7242)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1314)
  • Synthetic Biology (2009)
  • Systems Biology (5545)
  • Zoology (1130)