Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Modeling of Large-Scale Functional Brain Networks Based on Structural Connectivity from DTI: Comparison with EEG Derived Phase Coupling Networks and Evaluation of Alternative Methods along the Modeling Path

Holger Finger, Marlene Bönstrup, Bastian Cheng, Arnaud Messé, Claus Hilgetag, Götz Thomalla, Christian Gerloff, Peter König
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/043109
Holger Finger
1Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
4Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marlene Bönstrup
2Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bastian Cheng
2Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arnaud Messé
3Department of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claus Hilgetag
3Department of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Götz Thomalla
2Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Gerloff
2Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter König
1Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
4Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Here we use computational modeling of fast neural dynamics to explore the relationship between structural and functional coupling in a population of healthy subjects. We use DTI data to estimate structural connectivity and subsequently model phase couplings from band-limited oscillatory signals derived from multichannel EEG data. Our results show that about 23.4% of the variance in empirical networks of resting-state fast oscillations is explained by the underlying white matter architecture. By simulating functional connectivity using a simple reference model, the match between simulated and empirical functional connectivity further increases to 45.4%. In a second step, we use our modeling framework to explore several technical alternatives along the modeling path. First, we find that an augmentation of homotopic connections in the structural connectivity matrix improves the link to functional connectivity while a correction for fiber distance slightly decreases the performance of the model. Second, a more complex computational model based on Kuramoto oscillators leads to a slight improvement of the model fit. Third, we show that the comparison of modeled and empirical functional connectivity at source level is much more specific for the underlying structural connectivity. However, different source reconstruction algorithms gave comparable results. Of note, as the fourth finding, the model fit was much better if zero-phase lag components were preserved in the empirical functional connectome, indicating a considerable amount of functionally relevant synchrony taking place with near zero or zero-phase lag. The combination of the best performing alternatives at each stage in the pipeline results in a model that explains 54.4% of the variance in the empirical EEG functional connectivity. Our study shows that large-scale brain circuits of fast neural network synchrony strongly rely upon the structural connectome and simple computational models of neural activity can explain missing links in the structure-function relationship.

Author Summary Brain imaging techniques are broadly divided into the two categories of structural and functional imaging. Structural imaging provides information about the static physical connectivity within the brain, while functional imaging provides data about the dynamic ongoing activation of brain areas. Computational models allow to bridge the gap between these two modalities and allow to gain new insights. Specifically, in this study, we use structural data from diffusion tractography recordings to model functional brain connectivity obtained from fast EEG dynamics. First, we present a simple reference procedure which consists of several steps to link the structural to the functional empirical data. Second, we systematically compare several alternative methods along the modeling path in order to assess their impact on the overall fit between simulations and empirical data. We explore preprocessing steps of the structural connectivity and different levels of complexity of the computational model. We highlight the importance of source reconstruction and compare commonly used source reconstruction algorithms and metrics to assess functional connectivity. Our results serve as an important orienting frame for the emerging field of brain network modeling.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 10, 2016.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Modeling of Large-Scale Functional Brain Networks Based on Structural Connectivity from DTI: Comparison with EEG Derived Phase Coupling Networks and Evaluation of Alternative Methods along the Modeling Path
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Modeling of Large-Scale Functional Brain Networks Based on Structural Connectivity from DTI: Comparison with EEG Derived Phase Coupling Networks and Evaluation of Alternative Methods along the Modeling Path
Holger Finger, Marlene Bönstrup, Bastian Cheng, Arnaud Messé, Claus Hilgetag, Götz Thomalla, Christian Gerloff, Peter König
bioRxiv 043109; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/043109
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Modeling of Large-Scale Functional Brain Networks Based on Structural Connectivity from DTI: Comparison with EEG Derived Phase Coupling Networks and Evaluation of Alternative Methods along the Modeling Path
Holger Finger, Marlene Bönstrup, Bastian Cheng, Arnaud Messé, Claus Hilgetag, Götz Thomalla, Christian Gerloff, Peter König
bioRxiv 043109; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/043109

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4239)
  • Biochemistry (9171)
  • Bioengineering (6804)
  • Bioinformatics (24062)
  • Biophysics (12154)
  • Cancer Biology (9564)
  • Cell Biology (13824)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7656)
  • Ecology (11736)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15540)
  • Genetics (10670)
  • Genomics (14358)
  • Immunology (9511)
  • Microbiology (22901)
  • Molecular Biology (9129)
  • Neuroscience (49107)
  • Paleontology (357)
  • Pathology (1487)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2583)
  • Physiology (3851)
  • Plant Biology (8351)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1473)
  • Synthetic Biology (2301)
  • Systems Biology (6205)
  • Zoology (1302)