Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Nucleosome fragility is associated with future transcriptional response to developmental cues and stress in C. elegans

Tess E. Jeffers, Jason D. Lieb
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/047860
Tess E. Jeffers
1Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tjeffers@princeton.edu
Jason D. Lieb
1Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Nucleosomes have structural and regulatory functions in all eukaryotic DNA-templated processes. The position of nucleosomes on DNA and the stability of the underlying histone-DNA interactions affect the access of regulatory proteins to DNA. Both stability and position are regulated through DNA sequence, histone post-translational modifications, histone variants, chromatin remodelers, and transcription factors. Here, we explored the functional implications of nucleosome properties on gene expression and development in C. elegans embryos. We performed a time-course of micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion, and measured the relative sensitivity or resistance of nucleosomes throughout the genome. Fragile nucleosomes were defined by nucleosomal DNA fragments recoverable preferentially in early MNase-digestion time points. We found fragile nucleosomes at locations where we expected to find destabilized nucleosomes, like transcription factor binding sites where nucleosomes compete with DNA-binding factors. Contrary to our expectation, the presence of fragile nucleosomes in gene promoters was anti-correlated with transcriptional activity. Instead, genes with fragile nucleosomes in their promoters tended to be expressed in a context-specific way, operating in neuronal response, the immune system, and stress response. Nucleosome fragility at these promoters was strongly and positively correlated with the AT content of the underlying DNA. There was not a strong correlation between promoter nucleosome fragility and the levels of histone modifications or histone variants. Our data suggest that in C. elegans promoters, nucleosome fragility is primarily a DNA-encoded feature that poises genes for future context-specific activation in response to environmental stress and developmental cues.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 09, 2016.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nucleosome fragility is associated with future transcriptional response to developmental cues and stress in C. elegans
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Nucleosome fragility is associated with future transcriptional response to developmental cues and stress in C. elegans
Tess E. Jeffers, Jason D. Lieb
bioRxiv 047860; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/047860
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Nucleosome fragility is associated with future transcriptional response to developmental cues and stress in C. elegans
Tess E. Jeffers, Jason D. Lieb
bioRxiv 047860; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/047860

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4370)
  • Biochemistry (9551)
  • Bioengineering (7071)
  • Bioinformatics (24779)
  • Biophysics (12569)
  • Cancer Biology (9925)
  • Cell Biology (14303)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7932)
  • Ecology (12081)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15959)
  • Genetics (10905)
  • Genomics (14709)
  • Immunology (9848)
  • Microbiology (23587)
  • Molecular Biology (9457)
  • Neuroscience (50712)
  • Paleontology (369)
  • Pathology (1535)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2674)
  • Physiology (4001)
  • Plant Biology (8644)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1505)
  • Synthetic Biology (2388)
  • Systems Biology (6415)
  • Zoology (1345)