Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
Confirmatory Results

Is most published research really false?

Jeffrey T. Leek, Leah R. Jager
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/050575
Jeffrey T. Leek
1Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
2Center for Computational Biology, Johns Hopkins University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jtleek@gmail.com
Leah R. Jager
1Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

There has been an increasing concern that most published medical findings are false. But what does it mean to be false? Here we describe the range of definitions of false discoveries in the scientific literature. We summarize the philosophical, statistical, and experimental evidence for each type of false discovery. We discuss common underpinning problems with the scientific and data analytic practices and point to tools and behaviors that can be implemented to reduce the problems with published scientific results.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 27, 2016.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is most published research really false?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Is most published research really false?
Jeffrey T. Leek, Leah R. Jager
bioRxiv 050575; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/050575
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Is most published research really false?
Jeffrey T. Leek, Leah R. Jager
bioRxiv 050575; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/050575

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Scientific Communication and Education
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4246)
  • Biochemistry (9174)
  • Bioengineering (6806)
  • Bioinformatics (24065)
  • Biophysics (12160)
  • Cancer Biology (9566)
  • Cell Biology (13828)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7660)
  • Ecology (11738)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15544)
  • Genetics (10672)
  • Genomics (14363)
  • Immunology (9515)
  • Microbiology (22913)
  • Molecular Biology (9135)
  • Neuroscience (49161)
  • Paleontology (358)
  • Pathology (1487)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2584)
  • Physiology (3851)
  • Plant Biology (8351)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1473)
  • Synthetic Biology (2301)
  • Systems Biology (6206)
  • Zoology (1303)