Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Stay tuned: active amplification tunes tree-cricket ears to track temperature-dependent song frequency

View ORCID ProfileNatasha Mhatre, Gerald Pollack, Andrew Mason
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/050583
Natasha Mhatre
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto at Scarborough, Scarborough, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Natasha Mhatre
Gerald Pollack
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto at Scarborough, Scarborough, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Mason
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto at Scarborough, Scarborough, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Tree cricket males produce tonal songs, used for mate-attraction and male-male interactions. Active mechanics tunes hearing to conspecific song frequency. However, tree cricket song frequency increases with temperature, presenting a problem for tuned listeners. We show that the actively amplified frequency increases with temperature, thus shifting mechanical and neuronal auditory tuning to maintain a match with conspecific song frequency. Active auditory processes are known from several taxa, but their adaptive function has rarely been demonstrated. We show that tree crickets harness active processes to ensure that auditory tuning remains matched to conspecific song frequency, despite changing environmental conditions and signal characteristics. Adaptive tuning allows tree crickets to selectively detect potential mates or rivals over large distances and is likely to bestow a strong selective advantage by reducing mate-finding effort and facilitating intermale interactions.

Main text

Animals using acoustic signals encode considerable information about species identity and individual quality in song spectral and temporal features [reviewed in 1]. For receivers, however, separating conspecific signals from other sounds can be difficult in real-world conditions. Tree crickets signal in a crowded acoustic space with potential for masking[2]. Many insects deal with this problem through tuned auditory systems that respond selectively to frequencies representing conspecific signals[1]. However, in tree crickets this strategy is complicated by temperature-dependent, hence variable, song frequency[3].

Tree cricket auditory tuning is determined by frequency-specific, active amplification of tympanal vibration at low sound amplitudes[4,5]. Active amplification is a mechanical process that is achieved physiologically[6]; auditory neurons use axonemal dyneins[7,8] to generate forces[9] that preferentially amplify frequencies representing conspecific songs[4,5,10]. Since a physiological rather than mechanical process determines tuning, temperature is expected to affect this process.

Here we test, in the North American tree cricket Oecanthus nigricornis, whether the amplified frequency increases with temperature thereby allowing the auditory system to remain tuned by tracking changes in conspecific song frequency.

Temperature affects self-sustained oscillations and mechanical tuning

Self-sustained oscillations (SOs) are characteristic of active auditory mechanics, and occur in tree cricket tympana[4,5]. SOs are generated by the same processes underlying active amplification, and reveal the actively amplified frequency[4,9,11]. Fig. 1A shows frequency spectra of SOs measured from the anterior tympanal membrane (ATM) over temperatures ranging from 21 to 30°C, over which SO frequency increased linearly by 112 Hz/°C (Fig. 1A inset). Change in SO frequency corresponded well with the previously reported range of O. nigricornis song frequencies (3.6 to 4.9 kHz from 19.3 to 29.6°C ambient temperature), and with the slope of the frequency-temperature relationship (144 Hz/°C, R2 = 0.74; data from [12]). The shallower slope that we measured may be due to a temperature mismatch between the surface of the Peltier element that we used to control temperature and the tympanum (see supplemental methods).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1

Spontaneous oscillations (SOs) and mechanical tuning of an example Oecanthus nigricornis ATM. (A) SO best frequency increases linearly with temperature. Colours in the inset correspond to the SO frequency spectra in the main plot. (B) SO frequencies at low temperature are lower than those at (C) high temperature. (D) Mechanical responses of ATM change with stimulus level and temperature. Mechanical tuning is sharpest at low stimulus amplitude and shifts to higher frequencies with increasing temperature. This shift in best frequency is consistent across individuals (E, F; stimulation level: 2.5 mPa).

Fig. 1B & C illustrate SO spectra for seven individuals (3 females, 4 males) at low (22±1°C) and high (29±3°C) temperatures. SO frequencies increased with temperature despite considerable variation in both temperature ranges (Table 1). In all seven individuals best frequency was higher at higher temperatures, increasing on average by 720 ± 470 Hz.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1

Mechanical and neuronal tuning in different temperature regimes. Data are given as mean ± SD (N).

ATM motion showed the stimulus amplitude-dependent tuning well known from actively amplified auditory systems (Fig. 1D) [4,5]. At low stimulus amplitudes, a peak emerged in the ATM frequency response (Fig. 1D). Fig. 1 E & F show frequency response functions at low and high temperatures for 2.5 mPa (42 dB SPL) stimuli. As with the SOs, peak frequency was higher at higher temperatures in each individual. On average, best frequencies of sound-driven responses increased by 632 ± 270 Hz. The sharpness of the peak, (Q factor) was not significantly different between the two temperature ranges (Table 1).

Temperature affects neural tuning

We recorded extracellularly from the prothoracic ganglion, the first site of central neuronal processing of auditory information in crickets (Fig. 2A, B). Recodings were made in the hemiganglion contralateral to the side of stimulation in eight O. nigricornis (4 of each sex). Four animals had only one ear, because of injury either during development or dissection. In field crickets, the only prothoracic neuron readily recorded contralateral to the site of afferent input is ON1 (see supplemental methods), whose frequency tuning is representative of the auditory system [13]. Although prothoracic auditory neurons of Oecanthus have not yet been characterized, given the recording site, and the occurrence of an ON1-like neuron in several ensiferans[13–15], it is likely that these recordings were from a neuron homologous to ON1.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2

Sound-evoked responses of O. nigricornis putative ON1 interneuron at different temperatures. Example responses of one individual; 60 dB SPL stimuli at different frequencies for (A) low and (B) high temperatures. Coloured boxes indicate stimulus duration. (C) Tuning of an individual, expressed as sensitivity (neural response per unit sound pressure) varies with stimulus amplitude and temperature. Increases in best frequency with temperature are consistent across animals (D, E). (F) Thresholds are lower for on-peak frequencies than for off-peak frequencies (n = 8). Error lines indicate 95% prediction intervals for logistic fits. Threshold, saturation and dynamic range (mean ± SD) are indicated; variation is estimated by jack-knife resampling. Colours represent different individuals; males are indicated by circles and females by squares.

To allow comparison with mechanics, neural responses are represented per unit sound pressure (Fig. 2C–E). As observed in the mechanics, both neuronal tuning and sensitivity were amplitude-dependent. Tuning to conspecific frequency was sharpest near threshold and broadened as amplitude increased (Fig. 2C). Note, however, that amplitude-dependent tuning at the neural level does not require active auditory mechanics. Variation among receptors in sensitivity and tuning, and response saturation at high stimulus level, can account for responses that are more frequency-selective at low than at high stimulus levels. Indeed, we observed this in ON1 responses in the field cricket Gryllus assimilis, a species in which there is no sign of active tympanal mechanics (Fig. S1).

Crucially, however, neural tuning in O. nigricornis shifted up with temperature, mirroring the mechanics (Fig. 2D, E, Table 1). The average per-individual shift in best frequency was 938 ± 320 Hz. No such tuning shift occurred in G. assimilis (Fig. S1), reinforcing the conclusion that the shift in frequency tuning is implemented by active mechanisms.

The benefit of temperature dependent tuning

Without active tuning, how much would a temperature mismatch reduce male active acoustic space? To estimate this, we compared the neuronal response at the best frequency at the temperature at which the recording was made (on-peak) and best frequency in the other temperature range (off-peak). Thresholds were determined from logistic fits to neuronal responses (Fig. 2F).

At both temperatures, thresholds were much lower for the amplified frequency (Fig. 2F, low temperature: P = 1.4e-4; high temperature: P = 4e-4; 1-tailed paired t-tests). Based on the shift in threshold, with fixed tuning to the low-temperature frequency, song produced at the best frequency for high temperatures would have to be 18.5 ± 1.8 dB SPL louder to be detected by a low-temperature ear. Considering attenuation due to spherical spreading alone, active amplification increases detection distance by a factor of 8.6 ± 1.7 and active area by a factor of 76.0 ± 30.9. Similarly song at best auditory frequency for low temperature would have to be 11.4 ± 1.8 dB SPL louder to be heard by a warm ear. This conservatively corresponds to an increase in detection distance by a factor of 3.8 ± 0.8 and acoustically active area by a factor of 14.8 ± 6.3.

The main effect of active amplification, thus, was to lower auditory thresholds at the temperature-appropriate frequency thereby increasing the distance over which a male signalling at that frequency could be heard.

It is important to note that the threshold achieved by the actively amplified O. nigricornis auditory system, at about 45 dB SPL, is similar to ON1 thresholds in field crickets ([13,16,17]). Indeed, even at very highest observed amplification, O. nigricornis tympana rarely achieve mechanical sensitivity higher than G. assimilis (Fig 1, S1, [5]). It has been argued that an actively amplified auditory system produces a high level of spontaneous noise near criticality, and so cannot lower the minimal detectable sound level[18]. Thus, we find that the primary function of active amplification in tree-crickets is not to lower the absolute auditory threshold below that of other crickets but rather to modulate auditory tuning to match conspecific song frequency even as it changes with temperature.

Active amplification has been invoked to explain the remarkable sensitivity, dynamic range, and frequency resolution of many auditory systems[19]. However, few studies demonstrate the contribution of active amplification to these processes, especially in ecologically relevant settings. Given that some features, such as fine frequency tuning[20] and high dynamic range[21] are achievable in systems that are, to the best of our knowledge, purely passive, the advantage of active amplification remains to be demonstrated.

Perhaps the most compelling demonstrations of functional roles for active amplification come from fruit flies and mosquitoes. In fly courtship, active amplification contributes to species isolation by matching antennal tuning to conspecific song frequency [10]. However, passive resonance can also achieve matched-filtering (Fig. S1 A, B, [22]), and the specific advantage of active tuning is unclear. In mosquitoes, mate recognition is believed to be mediated by convergence of higher harmonics of male and female flight tones[23]. In the genus Culex, mismatched harmonics are thought to be detected using low-frequency difference tones generated by active mechanics[24]. However, in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, the frequencies of the higher harmonics can be detected directly by the auditory organ[25], again questioning the specific advantage of the active process.

We show that an important selective advantage of active amplification is its flexibility and responsiveness to environmental conditions. While sender-receiver match can be achieved through resonance for a fixed frequency signal[22], resonant systems can only remain sensitive to a variable-frequency signal by being broadly tuned, thus compromising selectivity. Active systems can modify the amplified frequency and bypass this trade-off.

In insects, active amplification depends on the action of ATP dependent molecular motors[26]. Models suggest that the amplified frequency, and hence tuning may be determined by the ATPase rate of these motors[7,27]. Indeed, the temperature dependence of SO frequency has been observed in two poikilothermic organisms, frogs[28] and mosquitoes[7]. Here we show that tree crickets have both temperature-dependent SOs and mechanical and neural tuning, and that they exploit this property to maintain auditory sensitivity to song even as it changes with temperature, without loss of selectivity.

Data accessibility

The dataset supporting this article has been uploaded to the Dryad repository: https://datadryad.org/resource/doi:10.5061/dryad.fv8jv

Author contributions

NM made mechanical measurements and analysed data, GP made neuronal measurements and analysed data, NM, GP and AM designed the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors agree to be held accountable for the content therein and approve the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by NSERC Discovery grants to Gerald Pollack and Andrew Mason.

Footnotes

  • Contact Information: Natasha Mhatre: natasha.mhatre{at}gmail.com

References

  1. ↵
    Gerhardt, H. C. & Huber, F. 2002 Acoustic communications in insects and anurans. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago press.
  2. ↵
    Symes, L. B. 2014 Community composition affects the shape of mate response functions. Evolution 68, 2005–2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Walker, T. J. 1962 Factors responsible for intraspecific variation in the calling songs of crickets. Evolution 16, 407–428.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Mhatre, N. & Robert, D. 2013 A tympanal insect ear exploits a critical oscillator for active amplification and tuning. Curr. Biol. 23, 1952–1957.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Morley, E. L. & Mason, A. C. 2015 Active auditory mechanics in female black-horned tree crickets (Oecanthus nigricornis). J. Comp. Physiol. A 201, 1147–1155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Mhatre, N. 2015 Active amplification in insect ears: mechanics, models and molecules. J. Comp. Physiol. A 201.
  7. ↵
    Warren, B., Lukashkin, A. N. & Russell, I. J. 2010 The dynein-tubulin motor powers active oscillations and amplification in the hearing organ of the mosquito. Proc. Biol. Sci. 277, 1761–1769.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Karak, S.et al. 2015 Diverse roles of axonemal dyneins in Drosophila auditory neuron function and mechanical amplification in hearing. Sci. Rep. 5, 17085.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Göpfert, M. C., Humphris, A. D. L., Albert, J. T., Robert, D. & Hendrich, O. 2005 Power gain exhibited by motile mechanosensory neurons in Drosophila ears. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 325–330.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Riabinina, O., Dai, M., Duke, T. & Albert, J. T. 2011 Active process mediates species-specific tuning of Drosophila ears. Curr. Biol. 21, 658–664.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Gopfert, M. C. & Robert, D. 2001 Active auditory mechanics in mosquitoes. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 268, 333–339.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Walker, T. 1963 The taxonomy and calling songs of United States tree crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Oecaiithinae). II. The nigricornis group of the genus Oecanthus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 56, 772–789.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    Atkins, G. & Pollack, G. S. 1986 Age-dependent occurrence of an ascending axon on the omega neuron of the cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus. J. Comp. Neurol. 243, 527–534.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. Römer, H., Marquart, V. & Hardt, M. 1988 Organization of a sensory neuropile in the auditory pathway of two groups of Orthoptera. J. Comp. Neurol. 275, 201–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Mason, A. C. & Schildberger, K. 1993 Auditory interneurons in Cyphoderris monstrosa (Orthoptera : Haglidae). J. Comp. Physiol. A 171, 749–757.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    Wohlers, D. W. & Huber, F. 1982 Processing of sound signals By 6 types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket, Gryllus campestris. J. Comp. Physiol. A 146, 161–173.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    Stumpner, A., Atkins, G. & Stout, J. F. 1995 Processing of unilateral and bilateral auditory inputs by the ON1 and L1 interneurons of the cricket Acheta domesticus and comparison to other cricket species. J. Comp. Physiol. A 177, 379–388.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    Song, T., Lee, W. S. & Ahn, K.-H. 2015 Physical limits to auditory transduction of hair-cell bundles probed by a biomimetic system. Sci. Rep. 5, 11470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Hudspeth, A. J. 2014 Integrating the active process of hair cells with cochlear function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 600–614.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Imaizumi, K. & Pollack, G. S. 1999 Neural coding of sound frequency by cricket auditory receptors. J. Neurosci. 19, 1508–1516.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Imaizumi, K. & Pollack, G. S. 2001 Neural representation of sound amplitude by functionally different auditory receptors in crickets. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 1247–1260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Paton, J. A., Capranica, R. R., Dragsten, P. R. & Webb, W. W. 1977 Physical basis for auditory frequency analysis in field crickets (Gryllidae). J. Comp. Physiol. A 119, 221–240.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    Gibson, G., Warren, B. & Russell, I. J. 2010 Humming in tune: Sex and species recognition by mosquitoes on the wing. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 11, 527–540.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Warren, B., Gibson, G. & Russell, I. J. 2009 Sex recognition through midflight mating duets in Culex mosquitoes Is mediated by acoustic distortion. Curr. Biol. 19, 485–491.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Cator, L. J., Arthur, B. J., Harrington, L. C. & Hoy, R. R. 2009 Harmonic convergence in the love songs of the dengue vector mosquito. Science 323, 1077–1079.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Senthilan, P. R.et al. 2012 Drosophila auditory organ genes and genetic hearing defects. Cell 150, 1042–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Camalet, S., Duke, T., Jülicher, F. & Prost, J. 2000 Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 3183–3188.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Long, G. R., Van Dijk, P. & Wit, H. P. 1996 Temperature dependence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the edible frog (Rana esculenta). Hear. Res. 98, 22–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

References

  1. ↵
    Mhatre, N., Bhattacharya, M., Robert, D. & Balakrishnan, R. 2011 Matching sender and receiver: poikilothermy and frequency tuning in a tree cricket. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 2569–2578.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Mhatre, N. & Robert, D. 2013 A tympanal insect ear exploits a critical oscillator for active amplification and tuning. Curr. Biol. 23, 1952–1957. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.028)
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Mhatre, N., Montealegre-Z, F., Balakrishnan, R. & Robert, D. 2009 Mechanical response of the tympanal membranes of the tree cricket Oecanthus henryi. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sensory, Neural, Behav. Physiol. 195, 453–462.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    Windmill, J. F. C., Göpfert, M. C. & Robert, D. 2005 Tympanal travelling waves in migratory locusts. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 157–168. (doi:10.1242/jeb.01332)
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Strausfeld, N., Seyan, H., Wohlers, D. W. & Bacon, J. 1983 Lucifer yellow histology. In Functional Neuroanatomy, pp. 132–155. Berlin: Springer -Verlag.
  6. ↵
    Brodfuehrer, P. D. & Hoy, R. R. 1988 Effect of auditory deafferentation on the synaptic connectivity of a pair of identified interneurons in adult field crickets. J. Neurobiol. 19, 17–38. (doi:10.1002/neu.480190104)
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 27, 2016.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stay tuned: active amplification tunes tree-cricket ears to track temperature-dependent song frequency
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Stay tuned: active amplification tunes tree-cricket ears to track temperature-dependent song frequency
Natasha Mhatre, Gerald Pollack, Andrew Mason
bioRxiv 050583; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/050583
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Stay tuned: active amplification tunes tree-cricket ears to track temperature-dependent song frequency
Natasha Mhatre, Gerald Pollack, Andrew Mason
bioRxiv 050583; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/050583

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Physiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4234)
  • Biochemistry (9128)
  • Bioengineering (6781)
  • Bioinformatics (23998)
  • Biophysics (12124)
  • Cancer Biology (9534)
  • Cell Biology (13776)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7635)
  • Ecology (11698)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15508)
  • Genetics (10642)
  • Genomics (14324)
  • Immunology (9479)
  • Microbiology (22836)
  • Molecular Biology (9089)
  • Neuroscience (48987)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1482)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2570)
  • Physiology (3845)
  • Plant Biology (8330)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1471)
  • Synthetic Biology (2296)
  • Systems Biology (6190)
  • Zoology (1300)