Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Biogeographic Ancestry and Socioeconomic Outcomes in the Americas: A Meta-Analysis

View ORCID ProfileEmil O. W. Kirkegaard, Mingrui Wang, John Fuerst
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/055681
Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
aUlster Institute for Social Research, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
  • For correspondence: emil@emilkirkegaard.dk
Mingrui Wang
bDepartment of Biology, Beijing University of Agriculture, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Fuerst
cUlster Institute for Social Research, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Narrative reports suggest that socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with biogeographic ancestry (BGA) in the Americas. If so, SES potentially acts as a confound that needs to be taken into account when evaluating the relation between medical outcomes and BGA. To explore how systematic BGA-SES associations are, a meta-analysis of American studies was conducted. 40 studies were identified, yielding a total of 64 independent samples with directions of associations, including 48 independent samples with effect sizes. An analysis of association directions found a high degree of consistency. The square root n-weighted directions were 0.83 (K =36), -0.81 (K = 41) and -0.82 (K = 39) for European, Amerindian and African BGA, respectively. An analysis of effect size magnitudes found that European BGA was positively associated with SES, with a meta-analytic effect size of r = .18 [95% CI: .13 to .24, K = 28, n = 35,476.5], while both Amerindian and African BGA were negatively associated with SES, having meta-analytic effect sizes of -.14 [-.18 to -.10, K = 31, n = 28,937.5] and -.11 [-.15 to -.07, K = 28, n = 32,710.5], respectively. There was considerable cross-sample variation in effect sizes (mean I2 = 92%), but the sample size was not enough for performing credible moderator analysis. Implications for future studies are discussed.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 27, 2017.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biogeographic Ancestry and Socioeconomic Outcomes in the Americas: A Meta-Analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Biogeographic Ancestry and Socioeconomic Outcomes in the Americas: A Meta-Analysis
Emil O. W. Kirkegaard, Mingrui Wang, John Fuerst
bioRxiv 055681; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/055681
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Biogeographic Ancestry and Socioeconomic Outcomes in the Americas: A Meta-Analysis
Emil O. W. Kirkegaard, Mingrui Wang, John Fuerst
bioRxiv 055681; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/055681

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Scientific Communication and Education
  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4085)
  • Biochemistry (8756)
  • Bioengineering (6477)
  • Bioinformatics (23332)
  • Biophysics (11743)
  • Cancer Biology (9144)
  • Cell Biology (13244)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7412)
  • Ecology (11364)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15084)
  • Genetics (10397)
  • Genomics (14006)
  • Immunology (9115)
  • Microbiology (22036)
  • Molecular Biology (8777)
  • Neuroscience (47346)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1420)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2480)
  • Physiology (3703)
  • Plant Biology (8046)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1431)
  • Synthetic Biology (2207)
  • Systems Biology (6014)
  • Zoology (1249)