Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Locating the ligand binding Sites for the G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) using combined information from docking and sequence conservation

Ashley R. Vidad, Stephen Macaspac, View ORCID ProfileHo Leung Ng
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/061051
Ashley R. Vidad
1University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Chemistry, Honolulu, HI. USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Macaspac
1University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Chemistry, Honolulu, HI. USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ho Leung Ng
1University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Chemistry, Honolulu, HI. USA
2University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI. USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ho Leung Ng
  • For correspondence: hng@hawaii.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

High concentrations of estrogenic compounds can overstimulate estrogen receptors and potentially lead to breast, ovarian, and cervical cancers. Recently, a G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER/GPR30) was discovered that has no structural similarity to the well-characterized, classical estrogen receptor ERα. The crystal structure of GPER has not yet been determined, and the ligand binding sites have not yet been experimentally identified. The recent explosion of GPCR crystal structures now allow homology modeling with unprecedented reliability. We create, validate, and describe a homology model for GPER. We describe and apply ConDock, the first hybrid scoring function to use information from protein surface conservation and ligand docking, to predict binding sites on GPER for four ligands, estradiol, G1, G15, and tamoxifen. ConDock is a simple product function of sequence conservation and binding energy scores. ConDock predicts that all four ligands bind to the same location on GPER, centered on L119, H307, and N310; this site is deeper in the receptor cleft than are ligand binding sites predicted by previous studies. We compare the sites predicted by ConDock and traditional methods analyzing surface geometry, surface conservation, and ligand chemical interactions. Incorporating sequence conservation information in ConDock avoids errors resulting from physics-based scoring functions and modeling.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 29, 2016.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Locating the ligand binding Sites for the G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) using combined information from docking and sequence conservation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Locating the ligand binding Sites for the G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) using combined information from docking and sequence conservation
Ashley R. Vidad, Stephen Macaspac, Ho Leung Ng
bioRxiv 061051; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/061051
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Locating the ligand binding Sites for the G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) using combined information from docking and sequence conservation
Ashley R. Vidad, Stephen Macaspac, Ho Leung Ng
bioRxiv 061051; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/061051

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4224)
  • Biochemistry (9101)
  • Bioengineering (6749)
  • Bioinformatics (23935)
  • Biophysics (12086)
  • Cancer Biology (9491)
  • Cell Biology (13738)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7614)
  • Ecology (11656)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15476)
  • Genetics (10615)
  • Genomics (14292)
  • Immunology (9456)
  • Microbiology (22773)
  • Molecular Biology (9069)
  • Neuroscience (48840)
  • Paleontology (354)
  • Pathology (1479)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2562)
  • Physiology (3822)
  • Plant Biology (8307)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1467)
  • Synthetic Biology (2289)
  • Systems Biology (6170)
  • Zoology (1297)