Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

AFNI and Clustering: False Positive Rates Redux

Robert W Cox, Richard C Reynolds, Paul A Taylor
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/065862
Robert W Cox
Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, NIMH/NIH/DHHS, Bethesda MD USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard C Reynolds
Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, NIMH/NIH/DHHS, Bethesda MD USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul A Taylor
Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, NIMH/NIH/DHHS, Bethesda MD USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

In response to reports of inflated false positive rate (FPR) in FMRI group analysis tools, a series of replications, investigations, and software modifications were made to address this issue. While these investigations continue, significant progress has been made to adapt AFNI to fix such problems. Two separate lines of changes have been made. First, a long-tailed model for the spatial correlation of the FMRI noise characterized by autocorrelation function (ACF) was developed and implemented into the 3dClustSim tool for determining the cluster-size threshold to use for a given voxel-wise threshold. Second, the 3dttest++ program was modified to do randomization of the voxel-wise t-tests and then to feed those randomized t-statistic maps into 3dClustSim directly for cluster-size threshold determination-without any spatial model for the ACF. These approaches were tested with the Beijing subset of the FCON-1000 data collection. The first approach shows markedly improved (reduced) FPR, but in many cases is still above the nominal 5%. The second approach shows FPRs clustered tightly about 5% across all per-voxel p-value thresholds ≤ 0.01. If t-tests from a univariate GLM are adequate for the group analysis in question, the second approach is what the AFNI group currently recommends for thresholding. If more complex per-voxel statistical analyses are required (where permutation/randomization is impracticable), then our current recommendation is to use the new ACF modeling approach coupled with a per-voxel p-threshold of 0.001 or below. Simulations were also repeated with the now infamously “buggy” version of 3dClustSim: the effect of the bug on FPRs was minimal (of order a few percent).

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 26, 2016.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
AFNI and Clustering: False Positive Rates Redux
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
AFNI and Clustering: False Positive Rates Redux
Robert W Cox, Richard C Reynolds, Paul A Taylor
bioRxiv 065862; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/065862
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
AFNI and Clustering: False Positive Rates Redux
Robert W Cox, Richard C Reynolds, Paul A Taylor
bioRxiv 065862; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/065862

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2440)
  • Biochemistry (4803)
  • Bioengineering (3340)
  • Bioinformatics (14724)
  • Biophysics (6658)
  • Cancer Biology (5188)
  • Cell Biology (7455)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4378)
  • Ecology (6904)
  • Epidemiology (2057)
  • Evolutionary Biology (9943)
  • Genetics (7357)
  • Genomics (9550)
  • Immunology (4583)
  • Microbiology (12730)
  • Molecular Biology (4960)
  • Neuroscience (28422)
  • Paleontology (199)
  • Pathology (810)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1400)
  • Physiology (2031)
  • Plant Biology (4521)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (980)
  • Synthetic Biology (1305)
  • Systems Biology (3922)
  • Zoology (731)