Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

FICD acts bi-functionally to AMPylate and de-AMPylate the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP

View ORCID ProfileSteffen Preissler, View ORCID ProfileClaudia Rato, View ORCID ProfileLuke Perera, View ORCID ProfileVladimir Saudek, View ORCID ProfileDavid Ron
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/071332
Steffen Preissler
1Cambridge Institute for Medical Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Steffen Preissler
  • For correspondence: dr360@medschl.cam.ac.uk sp693@cam.ac.uk
Claudia Rato
1Cambridge Institute for Medical Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claudia Rato
Luke Perera
1Cambridge Institute for Medical Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Luke Perera
Vladimir Saudek
2Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XY, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vladimir Saudek
David Ron
1Cambridge Institute for Medical Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David Ron
  • For correspondence: dr360@medschl.cam.ac.uk sp693@cam.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Significance statement Some 25 years ago it was discovered that the activity of the ER chaperone BiP is regulated by covalent modification, the nature of which, AMPylation (not ADPribosylation, as had long been thought) and the enzyme responsible, FICD, have only recently been identified. Genetic inactivation of FICD and in vitro studies of the purified enzyme and substrate have done much to clarify the biochemical consequences of the modification and its underlying logic: As ER stress wanes, FICD uses ATP to AMPylate Thr518 of BiP locking BiP in a relatively inactive conformation. As ER stress levels re-mount the cells draw on this pool of inactive chaperone, which is de-AMPylated and restored to its fully active state.

Here we report on the identity of the de-AMPylating enzyme - and with it on the surprising finding that both AMPylation and de-AMPylation of BiP are carried out by the same polypeptide (FICD) using the same active site, both in vivo and in vitro. Analysis of the reaction products reveals that de-AMPylation does not involve trivial concentration-dependent micro-reversibility of an enzymatic reaction, but rather a switch in the active site of FICD that facilitates two antagonistic thermodynamically favored reactions.

Surprisingly BiP de-AMPylation (not AMPylation) is the default activity of FICD. The side-chain of a single regulatory residue, E234, toggles the enzyme between de-AMPylation and AMPylation in vitro. Our studies thereby uncover an active mechanism that must exist in the ER for coupling waning levels of unfolded protein stress to the conversion of FICD from its default de-AMPylation mode to BiP AMPylation. Whilst the details of this active switch remain to be discovered, we are able to suggest a plausible mechanism by which it may come about.

Identification of the enzyme that de-modifies BiP to reactivate it will be of interest to cell biologists, whereas the novel features of FICD as a dualfunctioning enzyme with a single bi-functional active site will be of broad interest to enzymologists and molecular biologists.

Abstract Protein folding homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is defended by an unfolded protein response (UPR) that matches ER chaperone capacity to the burden of unfolded proteins. As levels of unfolded proteins decline, a metazoanspecific FIC-domain containing ER-localized enzyme, FICD/HYPE, rapidly inactivates the major ER chaperone BiP by AMPylating T518. Here it is shown that the single catalytic domain of FICD can also release the attached AMP, restoring functionality to BiP. Consistent with a role for endogenous FICD in de-AMPylating BiP, FICD−/− cells are hypersensitive to introduction of a constitutively AMPylating, de-AMPylation defective mutant FICD. These opposing activities hinge on a regulatory residue, E234, whose default state renders FICD a constitutive de-AMPylase in vitro. The location of E234 on a conserved regulatory helix and the mutually antagonistic activities of FICD in vivo, suggest a mechanism whereby fluctuating unfolded protein load actively switches FICD from a de-AMPylase to an AMPylase.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 24, 2016.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
FICD acts bi-functionally to AMPylate and de-AMPylate the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
FICD acts bi-functionally to AMPylate and de-AMPylate the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP
Steffen Preissler, Claudia Rato, Luke Perera, Vladimir Saudek, David Ron
bioRxiv 071332; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/071332
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
FICD acts bi-functionally to AMPylate and de-AMPylate the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP
Steffen Preissler, Claudia Rato, Luke Perera, Vladimir Saudek, David Ron
bioRxiv 071332; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/071332

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Biochemistry
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3502)
  • Biochemistry (7343)
  • Bioengineering (5319)
  • Bioinformatics (20258)
  • Biophysics (10008)
  • Cancer Biology (7735)
  • Cell Biology (11293)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6434)
  • Ecology (9947)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13315)
  • Genetics (9359)
  • Genomics (12579)
  • Immunology (7696)
  • Microbiology (19008)
  • Molecular Biology (7437)
  • Neuroscience (41011)
  • Paleontology (300)
  • Pathology (1228)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2134)
  • Physiology (3155)
  • Plant Biology (6858)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1272)
  • Synthetic Biology (1895)
  • Systems Biology (5311)
  • Zoology (1087)