Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Hierarchical Evolutionary Preferences Explain Discrepancies in Expected Utility Theory

Michael Holton Price, James Holland Jones
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/081570
Michael Holton Price
1Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mhp12@psu.edu
James Holland Jones
2Department of Earth Systems Science, Stanford University
3Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University
4Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College, London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Article usage

Article usage: October 2016 to May 2022

AbstractFullPdf
Oct 20167050113
Nov 201653026
Dec 20164507
Jan 2017112015
Feb 2017134042
Mar 20172408
Apr 201732011
May 201731016
Jun 201722011
Jul 201735022
Aug 20172504
Sep 20173007
Oct 20171205
Nov 20173508
Dec 201737011
Jan 201842013
Feb 20181306
Mar 201818013
Apr 201842014
May 20181608
Jun 20182204
Jul 20182701
Aug 201852015
Sep 201850019
Oct 201827018
Nov 201816013
Dec 20182409
Jan 201927017
Feb 20191508
Mar 201931413
Apr 20192349
May 2019438
Jun 201931612
Jul 201916611
Aug 20191031319
Sep 2019481113
Oct 2019441231
Nov 2019261721
Dec 201919159
Jan 2020321412
Feb 2020471717
Mar 2020421611
Apr 202028515
May 2020221112
Jun 20203159
Jul 202019411
Aug 20201439
Sep 202027214
Oct 202022313
Nov 2020151312
Dec 2020171112
Jan 202112718
Feb 2021271228
Mar 20211996
Apr 202110316
May 202171011
Jun 202171714
Jul 20211276
Aug 2021251213
Sep 20211389
Oct 2021143918
Nov 20216516
Dec 20211683
Jan 20221122
Feb 20221136
Mar 20221933
Apr 202210011
May 2022516
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 24, 2016.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hierarchical Evolutionary Preferences Explain Discrepancies in Expected Utility Theory
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Hierarchical Evolutionary Preferences Explain Discrepancies in Expected Utility Theory
Michael Holton Price, James Holland Jones
bioRxiv 081570; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/081570
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Hierarchical Evolutionary Preferences Explain Discrepancies in Expected Utility Theory
Michael Holton Price, James Holland Jones
bioRxiv 081570; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/081570

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3477)
  • Biochemistry (7316)
  • Bioengineering (5294)
  • Bioinformatics (20189)
  • Biophysics (9972)
  • Cancer Biology (7698)
  • Cell Biology (11243)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6416)
  • Ecology (9912)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13271)
  • Genetics (9347)
  • Genomics (12544)
  • Immunology (7667)
  • Microbiology (18928)
  • Molecular Biology (7415)
  • Neuroscience (40870)
  • Paleontology (298)
  • Pathology (1226)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2125)
  • Physiology (3138)
  • Plant Biology (6836)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1268)
  • Synthetic Biology (1891)
  • Systems Biology (5295)
  • Zoology (1083)