Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Reconstruction of the Cortical Maps of the Tasmanian Tiger and Comparison to the Tasmanian Devil

Gregory S. Berns, Ken W.S. Ashwell
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/083592
Gregory S. Berns
1Psychology Dept., Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gberns@emory.edu
Ken W.S. Ashwell
2Dept. of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, NSW, 2052, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The last known Tasmanian tiger (Thylacinus cynocephalus) – aka the thylacine – died in 1936. Because its natural behavior was never documented, we are left to infer aspects of its behavior from museum specimens and unreliable historical recollections. Recent advances in brain imaging have made it possible to scan postmortem specimens of a wide range of animals, even more than a decade old. Any thylacine brain, however, would be more than 100 years old. Here, we show that it is possible to reconstruct white matter tracts in two thylacine brains. For functional interpretation, we compare to the white matter reconstructions of the brains of two Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii). We reconstructed the cortical projection zones of the basal ganglia and major thalamic nuclei. The basal ganglia reconstruction showed a more modularized pattern in the cortex of the thylacine, while the devil cortex was dominated by the putamen. Similarly, the thalamic projections had a more orderly topography in the thylacine than the devil. These results are consistent with theories of brain evolution suggesting that larger brains are more modularized. Functionally, the thylacine’s brain may have had relatively more cortex devoted to planning and decision-making, which would be consistent with a predatory ecological niche versus the scavenging niche of the devil.

SIGNIFICANCE The Tasmanian tiger – aka the thylacine – was a carnivorous marsupial and apex predator in Tasmania until the last one died in 1936. Very little is known about its natural behavior. Only four intact brain specimens are known to have survived. We used diffusion-weighted MRI to reconstruct the white matter pathways in two of these specimens, and for comparison, the brains of two Tasmanian devils. By comparing the maps of these projections in the cortex, we show that the thylacine’s brain is consistent with a more complex predatory strategy than the scavenging strategy of the Tasmanian devil.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 26, 2016.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reconstruction of the Cortical Maps of the Tasmanian Tiger and Comparison to the Tasmanian Devil
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Reconstruction of the Cortical Maps of the Tasmanian Tiger and Comparison to the Tasmanian Devil
Gregory S. Berns, Ken W.S. Ashwell
bioRxiv 083592; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/083592
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Reconstruction of the Cortical Maps of the Tasmanian Tiger and Comparison to the Tasmanian Devil
Gregory S. Berns, Ken W.S. Ashwell
bioRxiv 083592; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/083592

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4238)
  • Biochemistry (9159)
  • Bioengineering (6797)
  • Bioinformatics (24054)
  • Biophysics (12149)
  • Cancer Biology (9564)
  • Cell Biology (13819)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7654)
  • Ecology (11733)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15536)
  • Genetics (10665)
  • Genomics (14353)
  • Immunology (9504)
  • Microbiology (22887)
  • Molecular Biology (9120)
  • Neuroscience (49094)
  • Paleontology (357)
  • Pathology (1487)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2579)
  • Physiology (3851)
  • Plant Biology (8349)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1473)
  • Synthetic Biology (2300)
  • Systems Biology (6204)
  • Zoology (1302)