Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Genomic Rearrangements Considered as Quantitative Traits

Martha Imprialou, André Kahles, Joshua G. Steffen, Edward J. Osborne, Xiangchao Gan, Janne Lempe, Amarjit Bhomra, Eric Belfield, Anne Visscher, Robert Greenhalgh, Nicholas P Harberd, Richard Goram, Jotun Hein, Alexandre Robert-Seilaniantz, Jonathan Jones, Oliver Stegle, Paula Kover, Miltos Tsiantis, Magnus Nordborg, Gunnar Rätsch, Richard M. Clark, Richard Mott
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/087387
Martha Imprialou
1Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
André Kahles
2Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua G. Steffen
3Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-0840, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward J. Osborne
3Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-0840, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiangchao Gan
4Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Köln, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janne Lempe
4Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Köln, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amarjit Bhomra
1Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Belfield
5Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Visscher
5Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK
6Department of Comparative Plant and Fungal Biology, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Ardingly, RH17 6TN, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Greenhalgh
3Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-0840, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas P Harberd
5Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Goram
7John Innes Centre, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jotun Hein
8Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, OX1 3TG, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandre Robert-Seilaniantz
9UMR INRA-Agrocampus Ouest-Université de Rennes 1, 35653 Le Rheu Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Jones
10The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oliver Stegle
11European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paula Kover
12Dept of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miltos Tsiantis
4Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Köln, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Magnus Nordborg
13Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology, Vienna, 1030, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gunnar Rätsch
2Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard M. Clark
3Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-0840, USA
14Center for Cell and Genome Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-0840, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Mott
1Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
15UCL Genetics Institute, University College London, WC1 6BT, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

To understand the population genetics of structural variants (SVs), and their effects on phenotypes, we developed an approach to mapping SVs, particularly transpositions, segregating in a sequenced population, and which avoids calling SVs directly. The evidence for a potential SV at a locus is indicated by variation in the counts of short-reads that map anomalously to the locus. These SV traits are treated as quantitative traits and mapped genetically, analogously to a gene expression study. Association between an SV trait at one locus and genotypes at a distant locus indicate the origin and target of a transposition. Using ultra-low-coverage (0.3x) population sequence data from 488 recombinant inbred Arabidopsis genomes, we identified 6,502 segregating SVs. Remarkably, 25% of these were transpositions. Whilst many SVs cannot be delineated precisely, PCR validated 83% of 44 predicted transposition breakpoints. We show that specific SVs may be causative for quantitative trait loci for germination, fungal disease resistance and other phenotypes. Further we show that the phenotypic heritability attributable to sequence anomalies differs from, and in the case of time to germination and bolting, exceeds that due to standard genetic variation. Gene expression within SVs is also more likely to be silenced or dysregulated. This approach is generally applicable to large populations sequenced at low-coverage, and complements the prevalent strategy of SV discovery in fewer individuals sequenced at high coverage.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 12, 2016.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genomic Rearrangements Considered as Quantitative Traits
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Genomic Rearrangements Considered as Quantitative Traits
Martha Imprialou, André Kahles, Joshua G. Steffen, Edward J. Osborne, Xiangchao Gan, Janne Lempe, Amarjit Bhomra, Eric Belfield, Anne Visscher, Robert Greenhalgh, Nicholas P Harberd, Richard Goram, Jotun Hein, Alexandre Robert-Seilaniantz, Jonathan Jones, Oliver Stegle, Paula Kover, Miltos Tsiantis, Magnus Nordborg, Gunnar Rätsch, Richard M. Clark, Richard Mott
bioRxiv 087387; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/087387
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Genomic Rearrangements Considered as Quantitative Traits
Martha Imprialou, André Kahles, Joshua G. Steffen, Edward J. Osborne, Xiangchao Gan, Janne Lempe, Amarjit Bhomra, Eric Belfield, Anne Visscher, Robert Greenhalgh, Nicholas P Harberd, Richard Goram, Jotun Hein, Alexandre Robert-Seilaniantz, Jonathan Jones, Oliver Stegle, Paula Kover, Miltos Tsiantis, Magnus Nordborg, Gunnar Rätsch, Richard M. Clark, Richard Mott
bioRxiv 087387; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/087387

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4230)
  • Biochemistry (9123)
  • Bioengineering (6767)
  • Bioinformatics (23970)
  • Biophysics (12109)
  • Cancer Biology (9511)
  • Cell Biology (13753)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7623)
  • Ecology (11675)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15492)
  • Genetics (10632)
  • Genomics (14310)
  • Immunology (9473)
  • Microbiology (22824)
  • Molecular Biology (9087)
  • Neuroscience (48920)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1480)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2566)
  • Physiology (3841)
  • Plant Biology (8322)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1468)
  • Synthetic Biology (2295)
  • Systems Biology (6180)
  • Zoology (1299)