Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

How well do RNA-Seq differential gene expression tools perform in a eukaryote with a complex transcriptome?

View ORCID ProfileKimon Froussios, View ORCID ProfileNick J. Schurch, Katarzyna Mackinnon, View ORCID ProfileMarek Gierliński, View ORCID ProfileCéline Duc, Gordon G. Simpson, View ORCID ProfileGeoffrey J. Barton
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/090753
Kimon Froussios
1Division of Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kimon Froussios
Nick J. Schurch
1Division of Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nick J. Schurch
Katarzyna Mackinnon
2Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marek Gierliński
1Division of Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marek Gierliński
Céline Duc
2Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee
5GReD, Faculté de Médecine, 28, place Henri Dunant, BP 38 - 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Céline Duc
Gordon G. Simpson
2Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee
3Division of Plant Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dow Street, Dundee, DD1 5EH, UK.
4Cell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geoffrey J. Barton
1Division of Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee
2Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Geoffrey J. Barton
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

RNA-seq experiments are usually carried out in three or fewer replicates. In order to work well with so few samples, Differential Gene Expression (DGE) tools typically assume the form of the underlying distribution of gene expression. A recent highly replicated study revealed that RNA-seq gene expression measurements in yeast are best represented as being drawn from an underlying negative binomial distribution. In this paper, the statistical properties of gene expression in the higher eukaryote Arabidopsis thaliana are shown to be essentially identical to those from yeast despite the large increase in the size and complexity of the transcriptome: Gene expression measurements from this model plant species are consistent with being drawn from an underlying negative binomial or log-normal distribution and the false positive rate performance of nine widely used DGE tools is not strongly affected by the additional size and complexity of the A. thaliana transcriptome. For RNA-seq data, we therefore recommend the use of DGE tools that are based on the negative binomial distribution.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 13, 2017.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How well do RNA-Seq differential gene expression tools perform in a eukaryote with a complex transcriptome?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
How well do RNA-Seq differential gene expression tools perform in a eukaryote with a complex transcriptome?
Kimon Froussios, Nick J. Schurch, Katarzyna Mackinnon, Marek Gierliński, Céline Duc, Gordon G. Simpson, Geoffrey J. Barton
bioRxiv 090753; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/090753
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
How well do RNA-Seq differential gene expression tools perform in a eukaryote with a complex transcriptome?
Kimon Froussios, Nick J. Schurch, Katarzyna Mackinnon, Marek Gierliński, Céline Duc, Gordon G. Simpson, Geoffrey J. Barton
bioRxiv 090753; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/090753

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4237)
  • Biochemistry (9155)
  • Bioengineering (6797)
  • Bioinformatics (24052)
  • Biophysics (12149)
  • Cancer Biology (9562)
  • Cell Biology (13814)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7653)
  • Ecology (11729)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15534)
  • Genetics (10663)
  • Genomics (14346)
  • Immunology (9503)
  • Microbiology (22876)
  • Molecular Biology (9113)
  • Neuroscience (49080)
  • Paleontology (357)
  • Pathology (1487)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2576)
  • Physiology (3851)
  • Plant Biology (8347)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1473)
  • Synthetic Biology (2299)
  • Systems Biology (6202)
  • Zoology (1302)