New Results
A systematic comparison of error correction enzymes by next-generation sequencing
View ORCID ProfileNathan B. Lubock, Di Zhang, George M. Church, View ORCID ProfileSriram Kosuri
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/100685
Nathan B. Lubock
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
2UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, California, USA
3Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
Di Zhang
4Genomics and Computational Biology Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
George M. Church
5Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
6Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Sriram Kosuri
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
2UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, California, USA
3Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Article usage
Posted January 15, 2017.
A systematic comparison of error correction enzymes by next-generation sequencing
Nathan B. Lubock, Di Zhang, George M. Church, Sriram Kosuri
bioRxiv 100685; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/100685
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (9591)
- Bioengineering (7090)
- Bioinformatics (24856)
- Biophysics (12600)
- Cancer Biology (9956)
- Cell Biology (14349)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (7948)
- Ecology (12105)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (15988)
- Genetics (10925)
- Genomics (14738)
- Immunology (9869)
- Microbiology (23659)
- Molecular Biology (9484)
- Neuroscience (50856)
- Paleontology (369)
- Pathology (1539)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (2681)
- Physiology (4013)
- Plant Biology (8657)
- Synthetic Biology (2394)
- Systems Biology (6433)
- Zoology (1346)