Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

dRep: A tool for fast and accurate genome de-replication that enables tracking of microbial genotypes and improved genome recovery from metagenomes

Matthew R. Olm, Christopher T. Brown, Brandon Brooks, Jillian F. Banfield
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/108142
Matthew R. Olm
1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher T. Brown
1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brandon Brooks
1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jillian F. Banfield
2Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
3Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Jbanfield@berkeley.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The number of microbial genomes sequenced each year is expanding rapidly, in part due to genome-resolved metagenomic studies that routinely recover hundreds of draft-quality genomes. Rapid algorithms have been developed to comprehensively compare large genome sets, but they are not accurate with draft-quality genomes. Here we present dRep, a program that sequentially applies a fast, inaccurate estimation of genome distance and a slow but accurate measure of average nucleotide identity to reduce the computational time for pair-wise genome set comparisons by orders of magnitude. We demonstrate its use in a study where we separately assembled each metagenome from time series datasets. Groups of essentially identical genomes were identified with dRep, and the best genome from each set was selected. This resulted in recovery of significantly more and higher-quality genomes compared to the set recovered using the typical co-assembly method. Documentation is available at http://drep.readthedocs.io/en/master/ and source code is available at https://github.com/MrOlm/drep.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 13, 2017.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
dRep: A tool for fast and accurate genome de-replication that enables tracking of microbial genotypes and improved genome recovery from metagenomes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
dRep: A tool for fast and accurate genome de-replication that enables tracking of microbial genotypes and improved genome recovery from metagenomes
Matthew R. Olm, Christopher T. Brown, Brandon Brooks, Jillian F. Banfield
bioRxiv 108142; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/108142
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
dRep: A tool for fast and accurate genome de-replication that enables tracking of microbial genotypes and improved genome recovery from metagenomes
Matthew R. Olm, Christopher T. Brown, Brandon Brooks, Jillian F. Banfield
bioRxiv 108142; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/108142

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4228)
  • Biochemistry (9107)
  • Bioengineering (6751)
  • Bioinformatics (23944)
  • Biophysics (12089)
  • Cancer Biology (9495)
  • Cell Biology (13740)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7616)
  • Ecology (11661)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15479)
  • Genetics (10618)
  • Genomics (14296)
  • Immunology (9463)
  • Microbiology (22792)
  • Molecular Biology (9078)
  • Neuroscience (48889)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1479)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2565)
  • Physiology (3823)
  • Plant Biology (8308)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1467)
  • Synthetic Biology (2290)
  • Systems Biology (6172)
  • Zoology (1297)