Abstract
Recent advances have made it possible to analyze high-throughput marker-gene sequencing data without resorting to the customary construction of molecular operational taxonomic units (OTUs): clusters of sequencing reads that differ by less than a fixed dissimilarity threshold. New methods control errors sufficiently that sequence variants (SVs) can be resolved exactly, down to the level of single-nucleotide differences over the sequenced gene region. The benefits of finer taxonomic resolution are immediately apparent, and arguments for SV methods have focused on their improved resolution. Less obvious, but we believe more important, are the broad benefits deriving from the status of SVs as consistent labels with intrinsic biological meaning identified independently from a reference database. Here we discuss how those features grant SVs the combined advantages of closed-reference OTUs -- including computational costs that scale linearly with study size, simple merging between independently processed datasets, and forward prediction -- and of de novo OTUs -- including accurate diversity measurement and applicability to communities lacking deep coverage in reference databases. We argue that the improvements in reusability, reproducibility and comprehensiveness are sufficiently great that SVs should replace OTUs as the standard unit of marker gene analysis and reporting.
