Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Effects of Social Organization, Trap Arrangement and Density, Sampling Scale, and Population Density on Bias in Population Size Estimation Using Some Common Mark-Recapture Estimators

Manan Gupta, Amitabh Joshi, View ORCID ProfileT. N. C. Vidya
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/114306
Manan Gupta
Evolutionary and Organismal Biology Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (JNCASR), Bengaluru, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amitabh Joshi
Evolutionary and Organismal Biology Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (JNCASR), Bengaluru, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. N. C. Vidya
Evolutionary and Organismal Biology Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (JNCASR), Bengaluru, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T. N. C. Vidya
  • For correspondence: tncvidya@jncasr.ac.in
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Mark-recapture estimators are commonly used for population size estimation, and typically yield unbiased estimates for most solitary species with low to moderate home range sizes. However, these methods assume independence of captures among individuals, an assumption that is clearly violated in social species that show fission-fusion dynamics, such as the Asian elephant. In the specific case of Asian elephants, doubts have been raised about the accuracy of population size estimates. More importantly, the potential problem for the use of mark-recapture methods posed by social organization in general has not been systematically addressed. We developed an individual-based simulation framework to systematically examine the potential effects of type of social organization, as well as other factors such as trap density and arrangement, spatial scale of sampling, and population density, on bias in population sizes estimated by POPAN, Robust Design, and Robust Design with detection heterogeneity. In the present study, we ran simulations with biological, demographic and ecological parameters relevant to Asian elephant populations, but the simulation framework is easily extended to address questions relevant to other social species. We collected capture history data from the simulations, and used those data to test for bias in population size estimation. Social organization significantly affected bias in most analyses, but the effect sizes were variable, depending on other factors. Social organization tended to introduce large bias when trap arrangement was uniform and sampling effort was low. POPAN clearly outperformed the two Robust Design models we tested, yielding close to zero bias if traps were arranged at random in the study area, and when population density and trap density were not too low. Social organization did not have a major effect on bias for these parameter combinations at which POPAN gave more or less unbiased population size estimates. Therefore, the effect of social organization on bias in population estimation could be removed by using POPAN with specific parameter combinations, to obtain population size estimates in a social species.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 06, 2017.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of Social Organization, Trap Arrangement and Density, Sampling Scale, and Population Density on Bias in Population Size Estimation Using Some Common Mark-Recapture Estimators
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Effects of Social Organization, Trap Arrangement and Density, Sampling Scale, and Population Density on Bias in Population Size Estimation Using Some Common Mark-Recapture Estimators
Manan Gupta, Amitabh Joshi, T. N. C. Vidya
bioRxiv 114306; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/114306
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Effects of Social Organization, Trap Arrangement and Density, Sampling Scale, and Population Density on Bias in Population Size Estimation Using Some Common Mark-Recapture Estimators
Manan Gupta, Amitabh Joshi, T. N. C. Vidya
bioRxiv 114306; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/114306

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4113)
  • Biochemistry (8816)
  • Bioengineering (6519)
  • Bioinformatics (23463)
  • Biophysics (11791)
  • Cancer Biology (9209)
  • Cell Biology (13325)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7439)
  • Ecology (11411)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15152)
  • Genetics (10439)
  • Genomics (14044)
  • Immunology (9171)
  • Microbiology (22159)
  • Molecular Biology (8813)
  • Neuroscience (47573)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1429)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2492)
  • Physiology (3730)
  • Plant Biology (8082)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1437)
  • Synthetic Biology (2221)
  • Systems Biology (6039)
  • Zoology (1253)