New Results
Why do scientists fabricate and falsify data? A matched-control analysis of papers containing problematic image duplications
View ORCID ProfileDaniele Fanelli, Rodrigo Costas, Ferric C. Fang, Arturo Casadevall, Elisabeth M. Bik
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/126805
Daniele Fanelli
1Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), 1070 Arastradero Road, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Rodrigo Costas
2Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, P.O. Box 905 2300 AX Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ferric C. Fang
3Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195.
Arturo Casadevall
4Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Elisabeth M. Bik
5uBiome, San Francisco, CA 94105
Article usage
Posted April 12, 2017.
Why do scientists fabricate and falsify data? A matched-control analysis of papers containing problematic image duplications
Daniele Fanelli, Rodrigo Costas, Ferric C. Fang, Arturo Casadevall, Elisabeth M. Bik
bioRxiv 126805; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/126805
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (11703)
- Bioengineering (8718)
- Bioinformatics (29127)
- Biophysics (14930)
- Cancer Biology (12048)
- Cell Biology (17353)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (9406)
- Ecology (14143)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (18266)
- Genetics (12219)
- Genomics (16765)
- Immunology (11841)
- Microbiology (28003)
- Molecular Biology (11551)
- Neuroscience (60804)
- Paleontology (450)
- Pathology (1864)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (3229)
- Physiology (4939)
- Plant Biology (10383)
- Synthetic Biology (2877)
- Systems Biology (7333)
- Zoology (1642)