Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The threshold of binocularity: natural image statistics explain the reduction of visual acuity in peripheral vision

David W. Hunter, View ORCID ProfilePaul B. Hibbard
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/131177
David W. Hunter
1Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul B. Hibbard
2University of Essex, Colchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul B. Hibbard
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Visual acuity is greatest in the centre of the visual field, peaking in the fovea and degrading significantly towards the periphery. The rate of decay of visual performance with eccentricity depends strongly on the stimuli and task used in measurement. While detailed measures of this decay have been made across a broad range of tasks, a comprehensive theoretical account of this phenomenon is lacking. We demonstrate that the decay in visual performance can be attributed to the efficient encoding of binocular information in natural scenes. The efficient coding hypothesis holds that the early stages of visual processing attempt to form an efficient coding of ecologically valid stimuli. Using Independent Component Analysis to learn an efficient coding of stereoscopic images, we show that the ratio of binocular to monocular components varied with eccentricity at the same rate as human stereo acuity and Vernier acuity. Our results demonstrate that the organisation of the visual cortex is dependent on the underlying statistics of binocular scenes and, strikingly, that monocular acuity depends on the mechanisms by which the visual cortex processes binocular information. This result has important theoretical implications for understanding the encoding of visual information in the brain.

Footnotes

  • ↵* dah56{at}aber.ac.uk

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 26, 2017.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The threshold of binocularity: natural image statistics explain the reduction of visual acuity in peripheral vision
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The threshold of binocularity: natural image statistics explain the reduction of visual acuity in peripheral vision
David W. Hunter, Paul B. Hibbard
bioRxiv 131177; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/131177
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The threshold of binocularity: natural image statistics explain the reduction of visual acuity in peripheral vision
David W. Hunter, Paul B. Hibbard
bioRxiv 131177; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/131177

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2548)
  • Biochemistry (4995)
  • Bioengineering (3503)
  • Bioinformatics (15291)
  • Biophysics (6934)
  • Cancer Biology (5432)
  • Cell Biology (7783)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4564)
  • Ecology (7186)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10264)
  • Genetics (7542)
  • Genomics (9835)
  • Immunology (4905)
  • Microbiology (13311)
  • Molecular Biology (5170)
  • Neuroscience (29607)
  • Paleontology (203)
  • Pathology (842)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1471)
  • Physiology (2155)
  • Plant Biology (4788)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1016)
  • Synthetic Biology (1343)
  • Systems Biology (4025)
  • Zoology (773)