Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
Contradictory Results

No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women's hormonal status

View ORCID ProfileBenedict C. Jones, View ORCID ProfileAmanda C. Hahn, Claire I. Fisher, Hongyi Wang, View ORCID ProfileMichal Kandrik, Chengyang Han, Vanessa Fasolt, Danielle Morrison, View ORCID ProfileIris J. Holzleitner, View ORCID ProfileKieran J. O'Shea, View ORCID ProfileCraig Roberts, View ORCID ProfileAnthony C. Little, View ORCID ProfileLisa M. DeBruine
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/136549
Benedict C. Jones
University of Glasgow;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Benedict C. Jones
  • For correspondence: ben.jones@glasgow.ac.uk
Amanda C. Hahn
Humboldt State University;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amanda C. Hahn
Claire I. Fisher
University of Glasgow;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongyi Wang
University of Glasgow;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michal Kandrik
University of Glasgow;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michal Kandrik
Chengyang Han
University of Glasgow;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vanessa Fasolt
University of Glasgow;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danielle Morrison
University of Glasgow;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iris J. Holzleitner
University of Glasgow;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Iris J. Holzleitner
Kieran J. O'Shea
University of Glasgow;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kieran J. O'Shea
Craig Roberts
University of Stirling;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Craig Roberts
Anthony C. Little
University of Bath
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anthony C. Little
Lisa M. DeBruine
University of Glasgow;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lisa M. DeBruine
  • Abstract
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Although widely cited as strong evidence that sexual selection has shaped human facial attractiveness judgments, evidence that preferences for masculine characteristics in men's faces are related to women's hormonal status is equivocal and controversial. Consequently, we conducted the largest ever longitudinal study of the hormonal correlates of women's preferences for facial masculinity (N=584). Analyses showed no compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity were related to changes in women's salivary steroid hormone levels. Furthermore, both within-subject and between-subject comparisons showed no evidence that oral contraceptive use decreased masculinity preferences. However, women generally preferred masculinized over feminized versions of men's faces, particularly when assessing men's attractiveness for short-term, rather than long-term, relationships. Our results do not support the hypothesized link between women's preferences for facial masculinity and their hormonal status.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 29, 2017.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women's hormonal status
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
Share
No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women's hormonal status
Benedict C. Jones, Amanda C. Hahn, Claire I. Fisher, Hongyi Wang, Michal Kandrik, Chengyang Han, Vanessa Fasolt, Danielle Morrison, Iris J. Holzleitner, Kieran J. O'Shea, Craig Roberts, Anthony C. Little, Lisa M. DeBruine
bioRxiv 136549; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/136549
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women's hormonal status
Benedict C. Jones, Amanda C. Hahn, Claire I. Fisher, Hongyi Wang, Michal Kandrik, Chengyang Han, Vanessa Fasolt, Danielle Morrison, Iris J. Holzleitner, Kieran J. O'Shea, Craig Roberts, Anthony C. Little, Lisa M. DeBruine
bioRxiv 136549; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/136549

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (971)
  • Biochemistry (1440)
  • Bioengineering (916)
  • Bioinformatics (6688)
  • Biophysics (2370)
  • Cancer Biology (1736)
  • Cell Biology (2447)
  • Clinical Trials (104)
  • Developmental Biology (1648)
  • Ecology (2494)
  • Epidemiology (1442)
  • Evolutionary Biology (4938)
  • Genetics (3543)
  • Genomics (4542)
  • Immunology (1109)
  • Microbiology (4106)
  • Molecular Biology (1569)
  • Neuroscience (10468)
  • Paleontology (80)
  • Pathology (226)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (394)
  • Physiology (541)
  • Plant Biology (1402)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (402)
  • Synthetic Biology (541)
  • Systems Biology (1840)
  • Zoology (250)