Abstract
The malaria-causing blood stage of Plasmodium falciparum requires extracellular pantothenate for proliferation. The parasite converts pantothenate into coenzyme A (CoA) via five enzymes, the first being a pantothenate kinase (PfPanK). Multiple antiplasmodial pantothenate analogues, including pantothenol and CJ-15,801, kill the parasite by targeting CoA biosynthesis/utilisation. Their mechanism of action, however, remains unknown. Here, we show that parasites pressured with pantothenol or CJ-15,801 become resistant to these analogues. Whole-genome sequencing revealed mutations in one of two putative PanK genes (Pfpank1) in each resistant line. These mutations significantly alter PfPanK activity, with two conferring a fitness cost, consistent with Pfpank1 coding for a functional PanK that is essential for normal growth. The mutants exhibit a different sensitivity profile to recently-described, potent, antiplasmodial pantothenate analogues, with one line being hypersensitive. We provide evidence consistent with different pantothenate analogue classes having different mechanisms of action: some inhibit CoA biosynthesis while others inhibit CoA-utilising enzymes.
Introduction
In recent years, the effort to roll back malaria has shown encouraging progress through the increased use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets, improved diagnostics and artemisinin-based combination chemotherapies (ACTs)1. Evidence of this includes the decreasing worldwide malaria incidence (266 million cases in 2005 down to 212 million cases in 2015) and mortality (741,000 deaths in 2005 down to 429,000 deaths in 2015) over the past decade1. However, there is an alarming trend of ACT-resistant parasites emerging in multiple Asian countries where the disease is endemic2. Recently, there have also been multiple reports of patients contracting ACT-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria from various African countries3,4, which exemplify the clear risk of artemisinin resistance developing in the continent. This threat to the efficacy of ACTs highlights the requirement for a new armoury of antimalarial medicines, with several compounds representing different chemotypes entering the preclinical trial stage. However, the antimalarial drug-discovery pipeline is reliant on just a few known drug targets and the probability of successfully producing a new blood-stage medicine remains low5. In order to manage the threat of parasite drug resistance, there needs to be a continued effort to identify new classes of antimalarials. One metabolic pathway that has garnered recent interest for drug-development is the parasite’s coenzyme A (CoA) biosynthetic pathway6,7.
Early seminal studies have shown that the asexual stage of intra-erythrocytic P. falciparum absolutely requires an exogenous supply of vitamin B5 (pantothenate; Figure 1) for survival7-9. Pantothenate is taken up by the parasite10,11 and converted into CoA, an essential cofactor for many metabolic processes7. This conversion is catalysed by a series of five enzymes, the first of which is pantothenate kinase (PfPanK), an enzyme that phosphorylates pantothenate to form 4’-phosphopantothenate11. By performing this step, the parasite traps pantothenate within its cytosol and commits it to the CoA biosynthetic pathway10. The additional four steps are, in turn, catalysed by phosphopantothenoylcysteine synthetase (PfPPCS), phosphopantothenoylcysteine decarboxylase (PfPPCDC), phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferase (PfPPAT) and dephospho-CoA kinase (PfDPCK)6. Putative genes coding for each of the enzymes in the pathway (with several enzymes having multiple putative candidates) have been identified in the P. falciparum genome12,13 and have also been shown to be transcribed during the intraerythrocytic stage of the parasite’s lifecycle14. In order to capitalise on the pathway as a potential drug-development target, however, it is crucial to ascertain the exact identity of each of these putative genes. This will allow the drug discovery process to become more efficient and targeted.
Investigations aimed at discovering antiplasmodial agents that act by interfering with the parasite’s CoA biosynthetic pathway identified several antiplasmodial pantothenate analogues, including pantothenol (PanOH) and CJ-15,8019,15,16 (see Figure 1 for structures). Subsequent studies identified pantothenamides as antiplasmodial pantothenate analogues with substantially increased potency17-19. Unfortunately pantothenamides are unstable in vivo because they are degraded by the serum enzyme pantetheinase17. Recent reports of structural optimisations of lead pantothenamides have described two compounds, N5-trz-C1-Pan (compound 1e in Howieson et al.20) and N-PE-αMe-PanAm (see Figure 1 for structures), that are potent antiplasmodials (with nanomolar IC50 values) and also resistant to pantetheinase-mediated degradation20,21. However, although these compounds have been shown to target CoA biosynthesis or utilisation, their exact mechanism(s) of action has not been elucidated.
In this study, we have used continuous drug-pressuring with PanOH or CJ-15,801 to generate a number of P. falciparum parasite lines that are several-fold resistant to these pantothenate analogues. Whole-genome sequencing revealed mutations in one of the two putative Pfpank genes of all of the clones, Pfpank1. Complementation experiments confirmed that these mutations are responsible for the resistance phenotypes. Characterisation of the effects of the mutations on parasite growth in culture and also PfPanK function, generated data consistent with the mutated gene coding for an active pantothenate kinase in P. falciparum and for the gene to be essential for normal parasite development during the intraerythrocytic stage of their lifecycle. Additional characterisation of the PanOH and CJ-15,801-resistant lines revealed that antiplasmodial pantothenate analogues have at least two distinct mechanisms of action, targeting CoA biosynthesis or utilisation. Both of these mechanisms can be influenced by the Pfpank1 mutations identified here. Furthermore, our study provides genetic evidence validating the importance of the metabolic activation of pantothenate analogues in the antiplasmodial activity of these compounds.
Materials and Methods
Parasite culture and lysate preparation
P. falciparum parasites were maintained in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 11 mM glucose, 200 μM hypoxanthine, 24 μg/mL gentamicin and 6 g/L Albumax II (referred to as complete medium) as previously described22. Clonal parasite populations were generated through limiting dilution cloning as reported previously23, with modifications. Parasite lysates were prepared from saponin-isolated mature trophozoite-stage parasites as described previously10.
Plasmid preparation and parasite transfection
Several plasmid constructs were generated through the course of this study to be used for different lines of investigations. The strategies used to generate the Pfpank1-pGlux-1, Pfpank1-stop-pGlux-1 and ΔPfpank1-pCC-1 plasmids are detailed in the SI. The constructs were transfected into ring-stage parasites and positive transfectants were selected by introducing WR99210 (10 nM)24.
Compound synthesis
The pantothenate analogues CJ-15,80125, N5-trz-C1-Pan26 and N-PE-αMe-PanAm21, used in this study were synthesised as reported previously.
SYBR Safe-based parasite proliferation assay
The effect of various compounds on the in vitro proliferation of the different parasite lines were tested using a previously-reported SYBR Safe-based fluorescence assay17, with minor modifications (SI). In vitro pantothenate requirement experiments were performed similarly (SI), except instead of a test compound, ring stage-infected erythrocytes were incubated in pantothenate-free complete RPMI 1640 medium (made complete as described above; Athena Enzyme Systems) supplemented with 2-fold serial dilutions of pantothenate. IC50 and SC50 values were determined from the sigmoidal curves fitted to each data set using nonlinear least squares regression (SI).
Drug pressuring
Two independent drug-pressuring cultures were initiated for each of the pantothenate analogues, PanOH and CJ-15,801. Pressuring was initiated by exposing synchronous ring-stage Parent line parasites (10 mL culture of 2 or 4% parasitaemia and 2% haematocrit) to either analogue at the IC50 values obtained for the Parent line at the time (PanOH = 400 μM and CJ-15,801 = 75 μM). Parasites were then exposed to cycles of increasing drug-pressure that lasts about 2 – 4 weeks each (SI). When the pressured parasites became approximately 8 × less sensitive than the Parent line to the selecting analogues, they were cloned and cultured in the absence of the analogues for the remainder of the study.
Competition assay
In order to compare the fitness of the mutant clones with that of the Parent, we set up three competition cultures, each containing a mixture of one mutant line and the Parent line. Equal number of parasites (5 × 108 cells in the first experiment and 2.5 × 108 cells in the second experiment) from each line were mixed into a single culture. Aliquots (3 to 5 mL) of these cultures were immediately used for a PanOH SYBR Safe-based parasite proliferation assay (to generate Week 0 data) as described above. The cultures were then maintained under standard conditions as detailed above for a period of 6 weeks before they were used to perform another PanOH proliferation assay (to generate Week 6 data).
Whole genome sequencing and variant calling
Next generation whole genome sequencing was performed by the Biomolecular Resource Facility at the Australian Cancer Research Foundation, the Australian National University. Samples were sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq platform with version 2 chemistry (2 × 250 base pairs, paired-end reads) Nextera XT Kit (Illumina). To determine the presence of any Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genome of the drug-pressured clones, the genomic sequencing data were analysed using an integrated variant calling pipeline, PlaTyPus, as previously described27, with minor modifications to resolve operating system compatibility. As PlaTyPus does not detect insertions-deletions SNPs (“indels”), the Integrated Genome Viewer (IGV) software (Broad Institute) was used to manually inspect the gene sequences of all putative enzymes in the CoA biosynthetic pathway for indels.
Generation of PfPanK1 model
The structure of PfPanK1 minus its parasite specific inserts was predicted by homology modeling using the AMPPNP and pantothenate-bound human PanK3 structure (PDB ID: 5KPR28) as a template. The model was generated using the one-to-one threading module of the Phyre2 webserver (available at http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre2)29.
Confocal microscopy
Erythrocytes infected with trophozoite-stage 3D7 strain P. falciparum parasites expressing PfPanK1-GFP were observed and imaged either with a Leica TCS-SP2-UV confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems) using a 63 × water immersion lens or a Leica TCS-SP5-UV confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems) using a 63 × oil immersion lens. The parasites were imaged as fixed or live cells as described in the SI.
Attempted disruption of Pfpank1
The PfPanK1 disruption plasmid, ΔPfpank1-pCC-1 (SI), was transfected into wild-type 3D7 strain P. falciparum, and positive transfectants were selected as described above. P. falciparum parasites have previously been shown to survive equally well in a pantothenate-free complete RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with ≥100 μM CoA as compared to standard complete medium, consistent with them having the capacity to take up exogenous CoA, hence bypassing the need for any PfPanK activity7. Therefore, to support the growth of any Pfpank1 gene-disrupted parasites generated with the ΔPfpank1-pCC-1 construct, parasites were continuously maintained in complete medium supplemented with 100 μM CoA following transfection. Positive and negative selection steps (with WR99210 and 5-FC respectively) were performed to isolate ΔPfpank1-pCC-1-transfectant parasites in which the double crossover homologous recombination had occurred (detailed in SI).
Southern blot analysis
gDNA samples (~2 μg) extracted from ΔPfpank1-pCC-1-transfectant parasites isolated through the positive and negative selection steps were digested with the restriction enzyme AflII (New England Biolabs), before being analysed by southern blotting using the digoxigenin (DIG) system (Roche) according to the Roche DIG Applications Manual for Filter Hybridisation.
[14C]Pantothenate phosphorylation by parasite lysate
The phosphorylation of [14C]pantothenate by parasite lysates prepared from the Parent and mutant clonal lines was measured using Somogyi reagent (which precipitates phosphorylated compounds from solution) as outlined previously30, with some modifications (detailed in SI).
Metabolism of N5-trz-C1-Pan
Cultures of predominantly trophozoite-stage P. falciparum-infected erythrocytes (Parent line) were concentrated to > 95% parasitaemia using magnet-activated cell sorting as described elsewhere31. Following recovery, trophozoite-infected erythrocytes were treated with N5-trz-C1-Pan (1 μM) or a solvent control (0.01% v/v DMSO) before the metabolites in these samples were extracted and processed for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis. Metabolite samples were analysed by LC-MS, using a Dionex RSLC U3000 LC system (ThermoFisher) coupled with a high-resolution, Q-Exactive MS (ThermoFisher), as described previously32 (detailed in SI). LC-MS data were analysed in a non-targeted fashion using the IDEOM workflow, as described elsewhere33. Unique features identified in N5-trz-C1-Pan-treated samples were manually assessed by visualising high resolution accurate mass LC-MS data with Xcalibur Quanbrowser (ThermoFisher) software.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of means was carried out with unpaired, two-tailed, Student’s t test using GraphPad 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc) from which the 95% confidence interval of the difference between the means (95% CI) was obtained. All regression analysis was done using SigmaPlot version 11.0 for Windows (Systat Software, Inc).
Results
Pfpank1 mutations mediate parasite resistance to PanOH and CJ-15,801
The 3D7 P. falciparum strain was cloned through limiting dilution, and a single parasite line (henceforth referred to as the Parent line) was used to generate all of the subsequent lines tested in this study (unless otherwise specified). This was done to ensure that all of the parasite lines generated during the course of this study would share a common genetic background. Using the Parent line, three independent drug-pressuring cultures were set up (two with PanOH and one with CJ-15,801). When these parasites had attained approximately 8-fold decrease in sensitivity (~11 – 13 weeks of continuous pressuring), they were subsequently cloned by limiting dilution and maintained in the absence of drug pressure. In this manner, three parasite clones were generated: PanOH-A and PanOH-B were generated from the two independent PanOH-pressured cultures while CJ-A was generated from the CJ-15,801-pressured culture. The clones are significantly resistant (95% confidence interval (CI) exclude 0) to the pantothenate analogues they were pressured with. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of PanOH against PanOH-A and PanOH-B, and the IC50 value of CJ-15,801 against CJ-A are approximately 7 – 8-fold higher than those measured against the Parent line (Figure 2 a & b and Table S1). Significant cross-resistance towards the other pressuring analogue was observed for these clones, as compared to the Parent line (95% CI exclude 0). The PanOH-A and PanOH-B lines were found to be 4 – 6-fold less sensitive to CJ-15,801 while CJ-A was 13-fold less sensitive to PanOH (Figure 2 a & b and Table S1). To ensure that the clones did not develop a general drug-resistance phenotype during the selection process, we tested them against chloroquine, an antiplasmodial with a mechanism of action that is unrelated to the parasite’s CoA biosynthetic pathway34. We found that all of the drug-pressured lines have chloroquine IC50 values that are indistinguishable from that of the Parent line (Table S1).
The PanOH and CJ-15,801 resistance phenotypes observed in the clones was stable for several months of continuous culture in the absence of the pressuring analogue (≥ 3 months), consistent with a genetic alteration in these parasites. To determine the mutation(s) responsible for these phenotypes, gDNA was extracted from each clone and subjected to whole genome sequencing. All of the drug-resistant clones were found to harbour a unique mutation in the putative pantothenate kinase gene, Pfpank1 (PF3D7_1420600), as shown in Figure 3 a. Other non-synonymous mutations were detected for each clone (Table S2) but we did not find another gene that was mutated in all three clones. The mutation found in the Pfpank1 of PanOH-A results in the substitution of Asp507 for Asn. The other two drug-resistant clones have a mutation at position 95 of the protein: the Pfpank1 of PanOH-B harbours a deletion of the entire codon leading to a loss of the residue in the coded PfPanK1 protein, while the PfPanK1 of CJ-A has a Gly to Ala substitution. Since the structure of PfPanK1 has not yet been resolved, we generated a three-dimensional model in order to map the mutations within the enzyme. Figure 3 b shows a PfPanK1 model structure (pink) based on the solved structure of human PanK3 in complex with adenylyl-imidodiphosphate (AMPPNP) and pantothenate (PDB ID: 5KPR), overlaid on this structure (blue). The spheres shown in the model indicate the relative positions of the mutated residues, while the bound AMPPNP and pantothenate indicate the active site of the enzymes. Although the mutations are far apart in the primary amino acid sequence of PfPanK1, they are positioned in closer proximity to each other in the folded protein and are situated adjacent to the active site.
To confirm that the resistance phenotypes observed for the clones are directly caused by the mutations in Pfpank1, each clone was transfected with an episomal plasmid (Pfpank1-stop-pGlux-1) that enables the parasites to express the wild-type copy of Pfpank1 (in addition to the endogenous mutated copy). These complemented lines are indicated with a superscripted “+WTPfPanK1”. From Figure 4 (and Table S3), it can be observed that the complemented mutant clones (grey bars) are significantly less resistant to PanOH (Figure 4 a) and CJ-15,801 (Figure 4 b) compared to the non-complemented mutant clones (black bars; 95% CI exclude 0). As expected, the relative sensitivity of the mutant clones to chloroquine is unchanged by the presence of the PfPanK1-encoding plasmid (Figure 4 c). Transfection of the PfPanK1-encoding plasmid into the Parent line did not alter its sensitivity to PanOH, CJ-15,801 or chloroquine (Table S3). These data are consistent with the mutations observed in Pfpank1 being responsible for the resistance phenotype observed in the mutant clones.
Pfpank1 mutations impair parasite proliferation
To determine whether the Pfpank1 mutations impart a fitness cost to the parasite clones, we set up competition cultures, each by mixing an equal number of parasites from the Parent line and one of the mutant clonal lines, and maintained them under standard conditions for a period of 6 weeks (Figure 5 a). The sensitivity of each competition culture to PanOH was tested on the day the lines were mixed (Week 0) and again at the end of the 6-week period (Week 6). As expected, each Week 0 (dashed line) PanOH dose-response curve is between those obtained for the Parent and the respective mutant clone (dotted lines). A shift of the dose-response curve obtained at Week 6 (solid line) towards the dose-response curve of the Parent line would indicate that the mutant PfPanK1 imparts a fitness cost on the clone. As shown in Figure 5 b, the Week 6 curve for the PanOH-A competition culture only exhibited a marginal leftward shift from Week 0, whereas those for PanOH-B (Figure 5 c) and CJ-A (Figure 5 d) exhibited a more substantial shift, almost reaching the dose-response curve of the Parent line (dotted line, white circles). These results are consistent with the mutations at position 95 in the PfPanK1 of PanOH-B and CJ-A having a negative impact on the in vitro growth of the parasites. We also investigated the importance of PfPanK1 expression for parasite growth by attempting to disrupt the Pfpank1 locus in wild-type 3D7 parasites through homologous recombination (Figure S1 a). However, using southern blots, we failed to detect the presence of transfectants with the expected gene-knockout integration event (Figure S1 b), consistent with this gene being essential during the parasite’s intraerythrocytic stage.
PfPanK1 is a functional pantothenate kinase located within the parasite cytosol
The phosphorylation of radiolabelled pantothenate by lysates prepared from each of the mutant clones and the Parent line was measured to determine if the mutations in the putative Pfpank1 gene affect PanK activity, thereby demonstrating that the gene codes for a functional PanK. As shown in Figure 6, at the end of the 75 min time-course, the lysate prepared from PanOH-A phosphorylated approximately 3 × more [14C]pantothenate than the lysate prepared from the Parent line, while the lysate of PanOH-B generated about 3 × less phosphorylated [14C]pantothenate compared to the Parent line. By comparison, the lysate prepared from CJ-A only produced a small amount of phosphorylated [14C]pantothenate in the same time period. The inset in Figure 6 more readily demonstrates that PanK activity can be detected in CJ-A lysates when the experiment is carried out in the presence of a 100-fold higher pantothenate concentration (200 μM) and for an extended time (420 min). These observations provide strong evidence that the Pfpank1 gene codes for a functional PanK. To characterise further PfPanK1, we generated from the wild-type 3D7 strain a transgenic parasite line that episomally expresses a GFP-tagged copy of PfPanK1 in order to localise the protein within the parasite. We found that PfPanK1 is largely localised throughout the cytosol of trophozoite-stage parasites, and is not excluded from the nucleus (Figure 7).
To investigate further the effects of the PfPanK1 mutations present in the PanOH and CJ-15,801 resistant clones, we analysed the PanK activity profiles using lysates prepared from each mutant and the Parent, and determined their kinetic parameters from the Michaelis-Menten equation (Figure 8). The maximal velocity (Vmax) of pantothenate phosphorylation by lysates prepared from PanOH-A, PanOH-B and CJ-A are significantly higher (95% CI exclude 0) than that of the Parent. The apparent pantothenate Km values of the mutant clones are 26 – 609-fold higher (95% CI exclude 0) than that of the Parent line. Assuming that the enzyme concentration was identical across the different parasite lines when the lysates were generated, we calculated the PfPanK relative specificity constant for each parasite line. The relative specificity constant values indicate the catalytic efficiency of each variant of PfPanK relative to that of the Parent line. The relative specificity constant obtained for PanOH-A (0.74 ± 0.04, mean ± SEM) is not significantly different (95% CI include 0) from that of the Parent. However, those of PanOH-B (0.058 ± 0.004, mean ± SEM) and CJ-A (0.019 ± 0.005, mean ± SEM) are significantly lower (95% CI exclude 0). These data are consistent with all three PfPanK1 mutations observed reducing the enzyme’s affinity for pantothenate, although the associated increase in the enzyme Vmax compensates for the reduced affinity: fully in the PanOH-A clone, but to a much lesser extent in PanOH-B and CJ-A (resulting in a 17-fold and 52-fold reduction in the enzyme’s catalytic efficiency, respectively).
CJ-A requires a higher extracellular pantothenate concentration
An extracellular supply of pantothenate is essential for the in vitro proliferation of the intraerythrocytic stage of P. falciparum8. Given the impact that the PfPanK1 mutations have on PanK activity (Figures 8), we set out to determine whether a higher extracellular concentration of pantothenate is required to support the proliferation of the different mutant clones relative to that required by the Parent line. As observed in Figure 9 a, the proliferation of the Parent line (white circles) increased as the extracellular pantothenate concentration was increased, reaching the 100% control level (parasites maintained in the presence of 1 μM pantothenate, the concentration of pantothenate in the RPMI medium used to maintain all of the parasite cultures) at approximately 100 nM. In order to compare the extracellular pantothenate requirement between the different lines, we determined the SC50 (50% stimulatory concentration; i.e. the concentration of pantothenate required to support parasite proliferation to a level equivalent to 50% of the control level) values for the mutants (with and without complementation) and Parent. From Figure 9 b, it can be seen that the SC50 values of PanOH-A and PanOH-B are not different from that of the Parent line (95% CI include 0). Conversely, as illustrated by the rightward shift in its dose-response curve (black diamonds, Figure 9 a), the pantothenate SC50 of CJ-A is approximately 3-fold higher than that of the Parent (Figure 9 b; 95% CI = 2.7 to 30.9). Furthermore, consistent with the data from the complementation experiments (Figure 4), the SC50 value of CJ-A+WTPfPanK1 is comparable to that of the Parent line and also the control line, Parent+WTPfPanK1, indicating that the episomal expression of wild-type PfPanK1 is sufficient to reverse the phenotypic effects of the mutation.
N5-trz-C1-Pan and N-PE-αMe-PanAm have a different mechanism of action to PanOH and CJ-15,801
To determine whether the resistance of the clones to PanOH and CJ-15,801 extends to other pantothenate analogues, we tested the mutant clones against the two recently-described, modified pantothenamides with potent antiplasmodial activities, namely N5-trz-C1-Pan20 and N-PE-αMe-PanAm21. We found that PanOH-A is 3-fold more sensitive to N5-trz-C1-Pan, PanOH-B is 2-fold more resistant and CJ-A is 9-fold more resistant when compared to the Parent line (95% CI exclude 0; Figure 10a and Table S4, left side). Similarly, we found that relative to the Parent line, PanOH-A was more sensitive to N-PE-αMe-PanAm (~2-fold), while CJ-A is 2-fold more resistant (95% CI exclude 0). The sensitivity of PanOH-B to N-PE-αMe-PanAm was statistically indistinguishable from that of the Parent line (95% CI = -0.046 to 0.005; Figure 10 b and Table S4, left side). These results indicate that PfPanK1 can influence the sensitivity of the parasite to multiple antiplasmodial pantothenate analogues. Remarkably, the mutation at position 507 of the PfPanK1 in PanOH-A makes the parasite resistant to the antiplasmodial activity of certain pantothenate analogues (PanOH and CJ-15,801) whilst at the same time hyper-sensitises the parasite to pantothenate analogues of a different class (modified pantothenamides, N5-trz-C1-Pan and N-PE-αMe-PanAm).
Previous work has shown that, in bacteria, pantothenamides are metabolised by the CoA biosynthetic pathway to form CoA antimetabolites35, consistent with PanK activity being important for metabolic activation of pantothenamides. Additionally, it has been reported recently that pantothenamides are also phosphorylated by the PanK in P. falciparum36, in line with their metabolic activation in bacteria. We therefore set out to determine whether the modified, pantetheinase-resistant, pantothenamides are metabolised and to what extent. In order to do so we exposed intact P. falciparum-infected erythrocytes to N5-trz-C1-Pan (at ~10 × the IC50 for 4 h) and subjected lysates from the treated (and control) samples to untargeted LC-MS. Among the metabolites extracted from parasite-infected erythrocytes treated with N5-trz-C1-Pan (but not untreated control samples) were molecules with masses corresponding to phosphorylated N5-trz-C1-Pan ([M-H]- m/z 378.1668), a dephospho-CoA analogue of N5-trz-C1-Pan ([M-2H]2- m/z 353.6099) and a CoA analogue of N5-trz-C1-Pan ([M-H]- m/z 787.1858) as shown in Figure S2. This is consistent with N5-trz-C1-Pan being metabolised within infected erythrocytes to generate a CoA antimetabolite.
Lastly, we investigated the ability of the different pantothenate analogues to inhibit the phosphorylation of [14C]pantothenate by parasite lysates prepared from the various mutant clones. These data are shown in Figure 10 c – f and Table S4, right side. All of the analogues tested are significantly less effective (95% CI exclude 0) at inhibiting pantothenate phosphorylation by lysates generated from the mutant clones compared to their ability to inhibit pantothenate phosphorylation by lysates prepared from the Parent line. The exception being N-PE-αMe-PanAm, which did not reach statistical significance when tested against lysate prepared from PanOH-A. Additionally, the effectiveness of the analogues at inhibiting of pantothenate phosphorylation by lysates prepared from the mutant lines all observe the following order: PanOH-A > PanOH-B > CJ-A.
Discussion
The putative Pfpank1 gene codes for a functional pantothenate kinase
When PfPanK1 is compared to type II PanKs from other organisms in a multiple protein sequence alignment, the three nucleotide-binding motifs characteristic of this superfamily can be seen to be conserved in PfPanK1, consistent with it being a functional PanK7. However, biochemical confirmation of its putative function as a PanK has not been demonstrated. In this study, we show that mutations in the putative PfPanK1 lead to substantial changes in pantothenate kinase activity (Figure 8) providing, for the first time, biochemical evidence that the cytosolic PfPanK1 (Figure 7) is a functional pantothenate kinase. Furthermore, the fact that multiple independent experiments aimed at generating parasites resistant to PanOH and CJ-15,801 always selected for mutations in PfPanK1 (Figure 3 a and Table S2) is consistent with the kinase being the primary PanK involved in the metabolic activation of pantothenate analogues, at least during the intraerythrocytic stage.
Although it is clear that the PfPanK1 residues at position 95 and 507 are required for normal PfPanK1 activity (Figure 8), and the PfPanK1 model structure (Figure 3 b) shows that both residues are situated adjacent to the enzyme active site, their exact role(s) in modifying the activity of the protein is less obvious. The Gly residue at position 95 is conserved in eukaryotic PanKs and is the residue at the cap of the α2-helix7 in the inactive conformation of the protein (Figure S3 a). One possibility is that the change to Ala at this position could affect the structure of the helix and consequently the overall stability of the protein (at least when the protein is in the inactive state), as Gly has been shown to be much better than Ala at conferring structural stability when located at the caps of helices37. Alternatively, Gly residues have been shown to be present at a higher frequency in the active sites of some enzymes where they likely confer the flexibility to alternate between open and closed conformations38. Although the Gly95 residue is not part of the PfPanK1 active site perse, it is within close proximity to the site (Figure 3 b), and the α2-helix certainly undergoes a conformational change when PanK switches from the inactive conformation to the active one28. This conformational change is demonstrated in Figure S3 a, which shows an overlay of the human PanK3 crystal structures in the active28 and inactive39 state (Gly95 in PfPanK1 is equivalent to Gly117 in the human enzyme). It is worth noting that acetyl-CoA (an inhibitor of the enzyme) can only be accommodated in the binding site when the enzyme is in the inactive state, as when the enzyme is in the active state, the α2-helix encroaches on the space occupied by acetyl-CoA (Figure S3 a). This lends further support to the importance of this helix for the enzyme to transition from the inactive to the active state (and vice versa) and, therefore, to the role that Gly95 could play in this process. Either way, these suggestions may explain why a mutation at this position has a greater impact on PfPanK1 function than the mutation at position 507. The Asp residue at position 507 is replaced by a different amino acid (Glu) in most other eukaryotic PanKs, although they are both negatively-charged7. A substitution to the uncharged Asn could disrupt any important salt-bridges or hydrogen bonds with the residue at this position. In human PanK3, the amino acid equivalent to Asp507 is Glu354. In the enzyme’s inactive state, Glu354 is within ionic bonding distance of Arg325, which in turn interacts with the 3’-phosphate of acetyl-CoA (Figure S3 b)39 and may therefore stabilise the inactive state of the enzyme. Conversely, in the enzyme’s active state, Glu354 and Arg325 are not within ionic bonding distance (Figure S3 b). If Asp507 in PfPanK1 plays a similar role to that proposed for Glu354 in human PanK3, the change at position 507 to an Asn (abolishing the negative charge) could prevent stabilisation of the inactive state, providing an explanation for the increased activity observed in PanOH-A (Figure 6). Determining the crystal structure of PfPanK1 bound with pantothenate may provide a better understanding of the roles these residues play in PanK function.
PfPanK1 is essential for normal intraerythrocytic proliferation of P. falciparum
It has been established that almost all of the 4’-phosphopantothenate found in P. falciparum-infected erythrocytes is generated within the parasite by PfPanK as part of its metabolism into CoA10, which is in line with PfPanK activity being essential for the parasite’s survival. In the present study, our inability to knock out PfPanK1 (Figure S1) is consistent with the protein being essential for the intraerythrocytic stage of P.falciparum, although we cannot exclude the unlikely possibility that the regions we targeted for the required double-crossover recombination event are genetically intractable. Our observation that clones PanOH-B and CJ-A, which harbour mutations at position 95 of PfPanK1, can be outcompeted by the Parent parasites in competition assays over approximately 20 intraerythrocytic cycles (Figure 5) is consistent with the mutations incurring a fitness cost. This, in turn, indicates that PfPanK1 is essential for normal parasite development, at least during the blood stage of its lifecycle. It was also found here that clone CJ-A requires an approximately 3-fold higher extracellular pantothenate concentration in order to survive (Figure 9), coinciding with this clone having the PfPanK with the highest Km. This is not surprising given the reported importance for the substrate concentration to exceed the enzyme Km for optimal enzyme efficiency40,41. More importantly, the requirement by this clone for a higher concentration of extracellular pantothenate is also congruent with PfPanK1 being essential for the normal development of P. falciparum during its asexual blood stage.
Our observation that PfPanK1 is essential for normal parasite growth during the blood stage is at odds with recent reports that show both PanK1 and PanK2 from Plasmodium yoelli and Plasmodium berghei are expendable during the blood stage of those parasites42,43. However, both of these murine malaria parasite species preferentially infect reticulocytes44,45. Unlike the mature erythrocytes preferred by P. falciparum, reticulocytes have been shown to provide a rich pool of nutrients for the parasite, allowing the murine parasites to survive metabolic or genetic changes that would have been deleterious in P. falciparum46. It is therefore conceivable that unlike the condition faced by P. falciparum, the reticulocyte-residing parasites are able to salvage sufficient CoA or CoA intermediates from the host cell for their survival, rendering the two PanK proteins dispensable during their intraerythrocytic stage, a possibility acknowledged by the authors of the P. berghei study43.
PanOH and CJ-15,801 share a common mechanism of action
We have presented data consistent with the observed PfPanK1 mutations being the genetic basis for the PanOH and CJ-15,801 resistance phenotypes observed in all of the drug-pressured clones we generated (Figure 4). As shown by the data presented in Figure 10, both PanOH and CJ-15,801 inhibited pantothenate phosphorylation by the mutated PfPanK1 proteins less effectively than their inhibition of pantothenate phosphorylation by the wild-type PfPanK1 (the order of their IC50 values is Parent < PanOH-A < PanOH-B < CJ-A). Importantly, this order is also reflected in the level of resistance of the mutant clones to these two analogues, although the magnitude is not preserved (Figure 2 and Table S1). These data are consistent with PfPanK1 being involved in the antiplasmodial activity of these analogues either as a target or a metabolic activator. Previous studies have demonstrated that the antiplasmodial activity of both PanOH and CJ-15,801 involves the inhibition of pantothenate phosphorylation by PfPanK9,15. More specifically, PanOH has been shown to inhibit PfPanK-mediated pantothenate phosphorylation by serving as its substrate47. CJ-15,801 is also likely to be a substrate of PfPanK, especially since it has been shown to be phosphorylated by the S. aureus PanK48, another type II PanK49. In addition, the same study showed that the second enzyme in the CoA biosynthetic pathway, PPCS, subsequently accepts phosphorylated CJ-15,801 as a substrate, and performs the first step of the PPCS reaction (cytidylylation) on it. However, unlike what happens with 4’-phosphopantothenate, this cytidylylated phospho-CJ-15,801 acts as a tight-binding, dead-end inhibitor of the enzyme48. A separate study also concluded that PanOH targets the PPCS enzyme in Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis50. Based on the data generated in this study and the published reports that PanOH and CJ-15,801 both inhibit PPCS in other systems, we propose a similar mechanism of action for these compounds in P. falciparum, whereby they are phosphorylated by PfPanK1 and subsequently block PfPPCS as dead-end inhibitors (Figure 11). The overlapping pattern of cross-resistance between the two compounds (Figure 2) is also in line with them having a similar mechanism of action. We propose that the observed resistance to PanOH and CJ-15,801 is due to the mutated PfPanK1 having a reduced capacity to phosphorylate these analogues relative to pantothenate. This would have the effect of reducing the amount of phosphorylated PanOH or CJ-15,801 generated relative to 4’-phosphopantothenate, thereby allowing the parasites to survive at higher concentrations of the drugs. Furthermore, our observation that the mutant clones have comparable levels of PanOH and CJ-15,801 resistance (Figure 2 and Table S1), despite having PfPanK1 proteins of vastly different efficiency (Figure 8), is likely due to the pathway flux control at the PfPPCS-mediated step in the CoA biosynthetic pathway of P. falciparum, as shown in a previous study31.
N5-trz-C1-Pan is converted into an antiplasmodial CoA analogue – N-PE-αMe-PanAm likely shares the same mechanism of action
N5-trz-C1-Pan and N-PE-αMe-PanAm are pantothenamide-mimics that harbour modifications to prevent them from being substrates of pantetheinase, thereby preventing their degradation: N-PE-αMe-PanAm is methylated at the α-carbon21 while N5-trz-C1-Pan harbours a triazole instead of the labile amide20. Our LC-MS data clearly show that N5-trz-C1-Pan is converted into a CoA antimetabolite (Figure S2), and it is therefore likely to go on to inhibit CoA-utilising enzymes, killing the parasite. Such a mechanism has previously been put forward to explain the antibiotic activity of two prototypical pantothenamides (N5-Pan and N7-Pan) whereby the compounds are phosphorylated by PanK and subsequently metabolised by PPAT and DPCK to generate analogues of CoA (ethyldethia-CoA and butyldethia-CoA)35,51,52. These CoA analogues then mediate their antibacterial effect/s primarily by inhibiting CoA-requiring enzymes and acyl carrier proteins35,51,52. Similarly, phospho-N5-trz-C1-Pan is not expected to interact with PfPPCS because it lacks the carboxyl group (Figure 1) required for the nucleotide activation by nucleotide transfer48. It is therefore expected to bypass the PfPPCS and PfPPCDC steps of the CoA biosynthetic pathway on its way to being converted into the CoA antimetabolite version of N5-trz-C1-Pan (Figure 11). Furthermore, the antiplasmodial activity rank order of N5-trz-C1-Pan against the various mutant clones is very similar to that of N-PE-αMe-PanAm – with PanOH-A being hypersensitive to both compounds, CJ-A resistant to both and PanOH-B, by comparison, exhibiting only small changes in sensitivity to the two compounds (Figure 10 a and b) – and is starkly different to those of PanOH and CJ-15,801 (Figure 2).
These are congruent with (i) the antiplasmodial mechanism of action of N-PE-αMe-PanAm being similar to that of N5-trz-C1-Pan and (ii) the antiplasmodial mechanism of action of N-PE-αMe-PanAm and N5-trz-C1-Pan being different to that of PanOH and CJ-15,801. The order of antiplasmodial activity of N5-trz-C1-Pan and N-PE-αMe-PanAm against the mutant clones can be explained on the basis of (i) the difference in the rate of PfPanK1 activity in the various clones at the concentrations of pantothenate and N5-trz-C1-Pan / N-PE-αMe-PanAm used (Figure 6), (ii) the fact that the PfPPCS-mediated step imposes pathway flux control31 and (iii) the fact that this pathway flux control is bypassed by N5-trz-C1-Pan (and almost certainly also by N-PE-αMe-PanAm) en route to its conversion into a CoA antimetabolite. As seen in Figure 6, in the presence of 2 μM pantothenate (a similar concentration to the 1 μM present in the antiplasmodial assay), the pantothenate phosphorylation rate of the different clones has the following rank order: PanOH-A > Parent > PanOH-B > CJ-A, approximately the inverse of the antiplasmodial IC50 values of N5-trz-C1-Pan and N-PE-αMe-PanAm (described above). Therefore, PanOH-A, for example, would be expected to generate more 4’-phosphopantothenate and phosphorylated N5-trz-C1-Pan (or N-PE-αMe-PanAm), based on the assumption that the mutation also leads to increased phosphorylation activity towards the pantothenate analogues (point i). Whilst the increased levels of 4’-phosphopantothenate would not be expected to result in a concomitant increase in CoA (due to the pathway flux control at PfPPCS; point ii), the increased production of phospho-N5-trz-C1-Pan would result in increased levels of the N5-trz-C1-Pan CoA antimetabolite as the flux control step is bypassed (point iii). This would immediately explain the increased level of sensitivity observed by PanOH-A to both N5-trz-C1-Pan and N-PE-αMe-PanAm and also the sensitivity rank order of the other parasite lines.
In conclusion, our study confirms for the first time that PfPanK1 functions as the active pantothenate kinase in the asexual blood stage of P. falciparum. Our data show that the sites of mutation in PfPanK1 reported here are important residues for normal PfPanK function and are essential for normal intraerythrocytic parasite growth, although further structural and functional studies are required to elucidate their exact role(s). Furthermore, we propose that following phosphorylation by PfPanK1, PanOH and CJ-15,801 compete with 4’-phosphopantothenate and serve as dead-end inhibitors of PfPPCS (depriving the parasite of CoA). In contrast, N-PE-αMe-PanAm and N5-trz-C1-Pan are further metabolised (by PfPPAT and PfDPCK) into CoA analogues that kill the parasite by inhibiting CoA-utilising metabolic processes. Finally, we provide the first genetic evidence consistent with pantothenate analogue activation being a critical step in their antiplasmodial activity.
Acknowledgements
Part of this work was funded by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia to K.J.S and K.A. (APP1129843), and a grant from the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) to K.A. E.T.T. was supported by a Research Training Program scholarship from the Australian Government. C.S. was funded by an NHMRC Overseas Biomedical Fellowship (1016357). CIHR provided a graduate scholarship to A.H. We would like to thank the Canberra branch of the Australian Red Cross Blood Service for providing red blood cells. We are also grateful to Marcin Adamski (ANU) for assistance with optimising of PlaTyPus.