Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Meiotic crossover patterning in the absence of ATR: Loss of interference and assurance but not the centromere effect

View ORCID ProfileMorgan M. Brady, Susan McMahan, View ORCID ProfileJeff Sekelsky
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/143651
Morgan M. Brady
*Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Morgan M. Brady
Susan McMahan
*Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology
†Department of Biology
‡Integrative Program in Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sekelsky@unc.edu
Jeff Sekelsky
*Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology
†Department of Biology
‡Integrative Program in Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jeff Sekelsky
  • For correspondence: sekelsky@unc.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Meiotic crossovers must be properly patterned to ensure accurate disjunction of homologous chromosomes during meiosis I. Disruption of the spatial distribution of crossovers can lead to nondisjunction, aneuploidy, gamete dysfunction, miscarriage, or birth defects. One of the earliest identified genes in involved proper crossover patterning is textitDrosophila mei-41, which encodes the ortholog of the checkpoint kinase ATR. Analysis of hypomorphic mutants suggested the existence of crossover patterning defects, but it was not possible to assess this in null mutants because of maternal-effect embryonic lethality. To overcome this lethality, we constructed mei-41 null mutants in which we expressed wild-type Mei-41 in the germline after completion of meiotic recombination, allowing progeny to survive. We find that crossovers are decreased to about one third of wild-type levels, but the reduction is not uniform, being less severe in the proximal regions of 2L than in medial or distal 2L or on the X chromosome. None of the crossovers formed in the absence of Mei-41 require Mei-9, the presumptive meiotic resolvase, suggesting that Mei-41 functions everywhere, despite the differential effects on crossover frequency. Interference appears to be significantly reduced or absent in mei-41 mutants, but the reduction in crossover density in centromere-proximal regions is largely intact. We propose that crossover patterning is achieved in a stepwise manner, with the crossover suppression related to proximity to the centromere occurring prior to and independently of crossover designation and enforcement of interference. In this model, Mei-41 has an essential after the centromere effect is established but before crossover designation and interference occur.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 20, 2017.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Meiotic crossover patterning in the absence of ATR: Loss of interference and assurance but not the centromere effect
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Meiotic crossover patterning in the absence of ATR: Loss of interference and assurance but not the centromere effect
Morgan M. Brady, Susan McMahan, Jeff Sekelsky
bioRxiv 143651; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/143651
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Meiotic crossover patterning in the absence of ATR: Loss of interference and assurance but not the centromere effect
Morgan M. Brady, Susan McMahan, Jeff Sekelsky
bioRxiv 143651; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/143651

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4235)
  • Biochemistry (9135)
  • Bioengineering (6784)
  • Bioinformatics (24000)
  • Biophysics (12129)
  • Cancer Biology (9534)
  • Cell Biology (13778)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7635)
  • Ecology (11701)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15513)
  • Genetics (10644)
  • Genomics (14326)
  • Immunology (9482)
  • Microbiology (22839)
  • Molecular Biology (9090)
  • Neuroscience (48993)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1482)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2570)
  • Physiology (3846)
  • Plant Biology (8331)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1471)
  • Synthetic Biology (2296)
  • Systems Biology (6192)
  • Zoology (1301)