Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Non-invasive laminar inference with MEG: Comparison of methods and source inversion algorithms

View ORCID ProfileJames J Bonaiuto, Holly E Rossiter, Sofie S Meyer, Natalie Adams, Simon Little, Martina F Callaghan, Fred Dick, Sven Bestmann, Gareth R Barnes
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/147215
James J Bonaiuto
1Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James J Bonaiuto
Holly E Rossiter
2CUBRIC, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sofie S Meyer
1Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, UK
3UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalie Adams
4The Hull York Medical School, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Little
5Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, 33 Queen Square, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martina F Callaghan
1Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fred Dick
6Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sven Bestmann
5Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, 33 Queen Square, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gareth R Barnes
1Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a direct measure of neuronal current flow; its anatomical resolution is therefore not constrained by physiology but rather by data quality and the models used to explain these data. Recent simulation work has shown that it is possible to distinguish between signals arising in the deep and superficial cortical laminae given accurate knowledge of these surfaces with respect to the MEG sensors. This previous work has focused around a single inversion scheme (multiple sparse priors) and a single global parametric fit metric (free energy). In this paper we use several different source inversion algorithms and both local and global, as well as parametric and non-parametric fit metrics in order to demonstrate the robustness of the discrimination between layers. We find that only algorithms with some sparsity constraint can successfully be used to make laminar discrimination. Importantly, local t-statistics, global cross-validation and free energy all provide robust and mutually corroborating metrics of fit. We show that discrimination accuracy is affected by patch size estimates, cortical surface features, and lead field strength, which suggests several possible future improvements to this technique. This study demonstrates the possibility of determining the laminar origin of MEG sensor activity, and thus directly testing theories of human cognition that involve laminar- and frequency-specific mechanisms. This possibility can now be achieved using recent developments in high precision MEG, most notably the use of subject-specific head-casts, which allow for significant increases in data quality and therefore anatomically precise MEG recordings.

Section Analysis methods

Classifications Source localization: inverse problem; Source localization: Other

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 07, 2017.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Non-invasive laminar inference with MEG: Comparison of methods and source inversion algorithms
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Non-invasive laminar inference with MEG: Comparison of methods and source inversion algorithms
James J Bonaiuto, Holly E Rossiter, Sofie S Meyer, Natalie Adams, Simon Little, Martina F Callaghan, Fred Dick, Sven Bestmann, Gareth R Barnes
bioRxiv 147215; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/147215
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Non-invasive laminar inference with MEG: Comparison of methods and source inversion algorithms
James J Bonaiuto, Holly E Rossiter, Sofie S Meyer, Natalie Adams, Simon Little, Martina F Callaghan, Fred Dick, Sven Bestmann, Gareth R Barnes
bioRxiv 147215; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/147215

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3479)
  • Biochemistry (7318)
  • Bioengineering (5296)
  • Bioinformatics (20196)
  • Biophysics (9976)
  • Cancer Biology (7701)
  • Cell Biology (11249)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6417)
  • Ecology (9915)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13276)
  • Genetics (9352)
  • Genomics (12551)
  • Immunology (7673)
  • Microbiology (18937)
  • Molecular Biology (7417)
  • Neuroscience (40887)
  • Paleontology (298)
  • Pathology (1226)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2125)
  • Physiology (3140)
  • Plant Biology (6837)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1270)
  • Synthetic Biology (1891)
  • Systems Biology (5296)
  • Zoology (1084)