Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Some empirical arguments demonstrating that the latent period varies over the course of a plant disease epidemic

View ORCID ProfileFrédéric Suffert, Robin N. Thompson
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/148619
Frédéric Suffert
1UMR BIOGER, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Frédéric Suffert
Robin N. Thompson
2Christ Church, University of Oxford, St. Aldates, Oxford OX1 1DP, UK
3Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
4Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Andrew Wiles Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The latent period is a crucial life history trait, particularly for polycyclic plant diseases, because it determines how many complete monocycles could theoretically occur during an epidemic. Many empirical studies have focused on the variation of the latent period with pathogen or host genotype, or changes in response to environmental factors. The focus on these aspects is unsurprising, as these factors classically form the three parts of the epidemiological triangle. Experiments in controlled conditions are generally used to assess pathogenicity and host susceptibility, and also provide the opportunity to measure the distribution of latent periods in epidemiological systems. Once estimated for one or several pairs of host-pathogen genotypes, the mean value of this important trait is usually considered to be fixed and is often used “as is” in epidemiological models. We show here that the latent period can display non-negligible variability over the course of a disease epidemic, and that this variability has multiple sources, some of which have complex, antagonistic impacts. We develop arguments for four sources of variation that challenge the implicit assumption that the latent period remains constant: daily fluctuations in leaf temperature, nature of inoculum, host stage or age of host tissues, intra-population competition and selection for aggressiveness traits. We focus on the wheat fungal disease Septoria tritici blotch (Zymoseptoria tritici), making use of empirical datasets collected during the first author’s own research projects and a targeted literature review. Such empirical epidemiological knowledge is new and potentially important for modelers. While some studies have demonstrated that the distribution of latent periods around the mean value has consequences for epidemiological dynamics, we show that it might also be important for epidemiological modelers to account for changes in this mean value during an annual epidemic. These results may be of critical importance for improving outbreak forecasting.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 20, 2018.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Some empirical arguments demonstrating that the latent period varies over the course of a plant disease epidemic
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Some empirical arguments demonstrating that the latent period varies over the course of a plant disease epidemic
Frédéric Suffert, Robin N. Thompson
bioRxiv 148619; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/148619
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Some empirical arguments demonstrating that the latent period varies over the course of a plant disease epidemic
Frédéric Suffert, Robin N. Thompson
bioRxiv 148619; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/148619

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4229)
  • Biochemistry (9118)
  • Bioengineering (6753)
  • Bioinformatics (23947)
  • Biophysics (12103)
  • Cancer Biology (9498)
  • Cell Biology (13745)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7617)
  • Ecology (11664)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15479)
  • Genetics (10621)
  • Genomics (14297)
  • Immunology (9467)
  • Microbiology (22806)
  • Molecular Biology (9081)
  • Neuroscience (48895)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1479)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2566)
  • Physiology (3826)
  • Plant Biology (8309)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1467)
  • Synthetic Biology (2294)
  • Systems Biology (6172)
  • Zoology (1297)