Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A rational theory of set size effects in working memory and attention

View ORCID ProfileRonald van den Berg, View ORCID ProfileWei Ji Ma
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/151365
Ronald van den Berg
1Department of Psychology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ronald van den Berg
Wei Ji Ma
2Center for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Wei Ji Ma
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The precision with which items are encoded in working memory and attention decreases with the number of encoded items. Current theories typically account for this “set size effect” by postulating a hard constraint on the allocated amount of encoding resource. While these theories have produced models that are descriptively successful, they offer no principled explanation for the very existence of set size effects: given their detrimental consequences for behavioral performance, why have these effects not been weeded out by evolutionary pressure, by allocating resources proportionally to the number of encoded items? Here, we propose a theory that is based on an ecological notion of rationality: set size effects are the result of a near-optimal trade-off between behavioral performance and the neural costs associated with stimulus encoding. We derive models for four visual working memory and attention tasks and show that they account well for data from eleven previously published experiments. Moreover, our results suggest that the total amount of resource that subjects allocate for stimulus encoding varies non-monotonically with set size, which is consistent with our rational theory of set size effects but not with previous descriptive theories. Altogether, our findings suggest that set size effects may have a rational basis and highlight the importance of considering ecological costs in theories of human cognition.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 06, 2017.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A rational theory of set size effects in working memory and attention
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A rational theory of set size effects in working memory and attention
Ronald van den Berg, Wei Ji Ma
bioRxiv 151365; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/151365
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A rational theory of set size effects in working memory and attention
Ronald van den Berg, Wei Ji Ma
bioRxiv 151365; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/151365

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4107)
  • Biochemistry (8811)
  • Bioengineering (6513)
  • Bioinformatics (23452)
  • Biophysics (11786)
  • Cancer Biology (9202)
  • Cell Biology (13316)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7431)
  • Ecology (11406)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15144)
  • Genetics (10433)
  • Genomics (14037)
  • Immunology (9168)
  • Microbiology (22150)
  • Molecular Biology (8806)
  • Neuroscience (47554)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1427)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2490)
  • Physiology (3730)
  • Plant Biology (8078)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1437)
  • Synthetic Biology (2220)
  • Systems Biology (6036)
  • Zoology (1252)