Abstract
During anoxia, proper energy maintenance is essential in order to maintain neural operation. Starvation activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), an evolutionarily conserved indicator of cellular energy status, in a cascade which modulates ATP production and consumption. We investigated the role of energetic status on anoxia tolerance in Drosophila and discovered that starvation or AMPK activation increases the speed of locomotor recovery from an anoxic coma. Using temporal and spatial genetic targeting we found that AMPK in the fat body contributes to starvation-induced fast locomotor recovery, whereas, under fed conditions, disrupting AMPK in oenocytes prolongs recovery. By evaluating spreading depolarization in the fly brain during anoxia we show that AMPK activation reduces the severity of ionic disruption and prolongs recovery of electrical activity. Further genetic targeting indicates that glial, but not neuronal, AMPK affects locomotor recovery. Together, these findings support a model in which AMPK is neuroprotective in Drosophila.
Introduction
Optimal neural function requires an uninterrupted supply of energy. Prolonged disruption of this supply can induce neuronal damage, whereas short periods can be tolerated and some organisms are more tolerant by virtue of adaptive mechanisms of metabolic suppression (Staples and Buck, 2009). Drosophila survive anoxic conditions, which induce severe energetic depletion, by entering a reversible coma (Lighton and Schilman, 2007; Benasayag-Meszaros et al., 2015). The coma is generated by anoxic depolarization in the brain (Armstrong et al., 2011) which is a form of spreading depolarization (SD), a loss of CNS ion gradients common to insects and mammals (Spong et al., 2016a) and associated with several important brain pathologies (Dreier and Reiffurth, 2015). During this coma, survival depends on the down-regulation of energy turnover and up-regulation of ATP-producing pathways (Hochachka et al., 1996). An enzyme known to play a role in coordinating energy allocation is the metabolic sensing protein, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK). In insect preparations AMPK activation mimics hypoxia and starvation by reducing neuronal excitability (Money et al., 2014) and exacerbating ouabain-induced SD (Rodgers-Garlick et al., 2011). Activation of AMPK contributes to mechanisms for coping with hypoxia by metabolic suppression in non-mammalian vertebrates, such as fish (Jibb and Richards, 2008; Zhu et al., 2013). AMPK has diverse roles in different mammalian tissues (Mantovani and Roy, 2011) but, in spite of much research on the role of AMPK in neural damage after oxygen limitation associated with stroke (Manwani and McCullough, 2013) there is little knowledge of its potential role in modulating induction and recovery from SD.
AMPK is a heterotrimeric protein consisting of a catalytic alpha (α) subunit, regulatory gamma (γ), and scaffolding beta subunit (β). Allosteric activation by AMP leads to the phosphorylation of the α subunit on a threonine residue (Thr-172) (Hawley et al., 1995). A rise in AMP, via the adenylation kinase reaction, occurs when ATP is depleted. Since AMP:ATP varies as a square of ADP:ATP, the AMPK cascade is a sensitive indicator of cellular energy change (Hardie et al., 1998). Once activated, AMPK inactivates the ATP-consuming anabolic pathways: fatty acid synthesis via phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylate and sterol synthesis via phosphorylation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Hardie et al., 1999). As a result, depression of acetyl-CoA carboxylate activates catabolic ATP-production via a reduction in malonyl-CoA concentration. Low concentration of malonyl-CoA reduces inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT-I), leading to an influx of fatty acid substrate (Guzman and Blazquez, 2004). Surplus fatty acid is converted into ketone bodies to be used as a source of alternative cellular energy during dietary restriction or prolonged starvation (Murray et al., 2016).
Mechanisms of metabolic regulation during dietary restriction are highly conserved. In mammals, dietary restriction leads to the accumulation of lipids in the liver, which are later oxidized to become ketone bodies. While ketone bodies are mainly synthesized and supplied by the liver, studies suggest glia exhibits hepatic-like ketogenic machinery (Blazquez et al., 1998). Dietary restriction, or 'ketogenic diets,' can protect the brain from oxidative stress in mammals as well as in Drosophila (Suzuki et al., 2001; Vigne et al., 2009; Gibson et al., 2012). In Drosophila, the oenocytes and fat body have metabolically similar liver-like functions (Gutierrez et al., 2007). Similarly, dietary restriction increases lipid accumulation in oenocytes and is associated with heightened levels of ketone bodies in the brain (Johnson et al., 2010; Schulz et al., 2015). While AMPK is activated in periods of dietary restriction (Slack et al., 2012), the role of AMPK in these tissues during anoxic stress is still unknown.
Here we show that AMPK modulates recovery from anoxic comas in Drosophila. This process involves the return of ion homeostasis in the brain followed by recovery of neural circuit function upon return to normoxia. We found that pharmacological AMPK activation mimics the effects of dietary restriction in regulating anoxic recovery and demonstrated using genetic manipulations that AMPK function in glia, rather than neurons, is important for recovery of locomotor circuits from SD. In addition, AMPK activity in tissues that drive metabolism (oenocytes, fat body, and glia) is central to recovery from anoxia. Our results are consistent with models that suggest AMPK mediates the supply of alternative neural energy and support the conclusion that the AMPK cascade is neuroprotective in Drosophila.
Material & Methods
Drosophila culture
All control lines were maintained on standard agar medium (SAM): 0.01 % molasses, 8.20 % cornmeal, 3.40 % killed yeast, 0.94 % agar, 0.18 % benzoic acid, 0.66 % propionic acid and 86.61 % water at room temperature (25 ± 0.25 °C) and 60-70 % relative humidity. Emerging flies were collected over a 48 hour period using nitrogen (N2) anesthesia and transferred to new food vials. All vials were maintained at equal densities (approx. 20 flies). Experiments were performed on male flies aged 5-9 days after eclosion. Flies were given a minimum of three days without N2 exposure before experimentation to mitigate acute tolerance to anoxia.
Fly strains
w1118 flies were used as control. Tissue specific manipulation of AMPK was achieved using the Gal4/UAS system. The UAS lines used to upregulate, UAS-Cherry-AMPKα (#51871), and downregulate, UAS-AMPKα-RNAi (#25931), AMPK have been previously described (Swick et al., 2013; Li et al., 2016).
GAL4 enhancer-trap strains with broad tissue expression included the pan-neuronal (Elav #8765) and pan-glial (Repo #7415) lines. Specific glial expression lines included surface glia (subperineural: NP2276) and neuropil glia (astrocyte: Alrm II, Alrm III, NP1243; ensheathing: mz0709, NP6520) (see (Awasaki et al., 2008) for a detailed review). Transgene controls were backcrossed to the w1118 background.
Expression patterns of mifepristone (RU486) steroid-activated Gal4 lines used are: P[Switch2]GSG3448 in fat body, oenocytes, and tracheal cells; P[Switch2]GSG10751 in fat body; P[Switch2]GSGB9-1 in oenocytes. All GSG lines were generated and described by Nicholson et al. (2008), with expression patterns shown in supplemental data (http://flystocks.bio.indiana.edu/Browse/gal4/gal4_switch.php).
All lines were obtained from the Bloomington Stock center (Bloomington, IN).
Treatments
Starvation
In preliminary experiments, flies exhibited optimal survival and anoxic tolerance after 24 hrs of starvation; w1118 flies were tested at 12, 24, 36 hours and during a survival assay (data not shown). Under starvation conditions, flies were transferred 24 hours before testing into vials containing water-soaked filter paper. The vials were rehydrated 12 hours into starvation to mitigate desiccation effects.
(B) Pharmacology
Metformin (1-1 dimethylbiguanide hydrochloride; Sigma-Aldrich) was added directly into heated standard agar medium, to make a 100 mM concentration, and allowed to settle for 24 hours before testing. AICAR (5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-D-ribose-furanoside; TOCRIS) was dissolved into 1% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) to make a 100 mM aqueous stock. Approximately 250 μl aliquots, from the stock, were layered on the standard agar medium and allowed to absorb for 24 hours before testing (Vigne et al., 2009). Controls were layered with 250 μl of 1% DMSO. Flies were fed AICAR or metformin for four days prior to testing.
(C) Gene-Switch System
Gene-Switch flies were fed RU486 (mifepristone; Sigma-Aldrich) based on optimal time and dose-dependent transcriptional activation reported (Osterwalder et al., 2001). RU486 was mixed into heated standard agar medium (10 μg/mL) and allowed to settle for 24 hours before testing. Gene-Switch flies under non-starvation conditions were placed on either standard agar medium or standard agar medium with RU486 for two or four days prior to testing. Gene-Switch flies under starvation conditions were fed standard agar medium for at least four days and then transferred 24 hours before testing into vials containing either non-nutritive agar or non-nutritive agar with RU486 (10 μg/mL).
Locomotor Assay
A high-throughput locomotor assay (Xiao and Robertson, 2015) was used to evaluate changes in activity level before and after anoxia. Flies were loaded into circular chambers (1.27 cm diameter x 0.3 cm height) (Fig. 1A); one fly per chamber. Video recording (15 fps) was used to capture two-dimensional locomotion as the chamber restricts vertical movement (Video 1S). Fly tracking software (Xiao and Robertson, 2015), was used to calculate each fly's location every 0.2 s throughout the recording period. The positions (x, y) of each fly was exported to Excel spreadsheets to evaluate different parameters.
The total recording included periods of baseline activity (10 min), anoxia (30 s of N2), and post-anoxic activity (60 min) (Fig. 1B). During the experiment airflow was maintained at 2 L/min to avoid hypoxic conditions, and a N2 (8 L/min) exposure was used to induce an anoxic coma. To allow animals to recover from handling, the first five minutes of each baseline recording was disregarded (Liu et al. 2007). Further, as placement in the chambers can injure the flies, individuals that failed to recover 10% of regular baseline activity (250 cm / 5 min) following anoxia were excluded from further analysis.
Locomotor Activity Parameters
(A) Pre-anoxia
Pre-anoxia parameters were used to evaluate changes in locomotor activity during the baseline period. Path Length (PL) was used to measure the total distance travelled (cm) during the 5 minute pre-anoxia period. Time at Rest (TAR) denotes a time period, 2 seconds or longer, during which the individual did not meet the defined 'activity' threshold (0.15 cm per second). This 'inactive' time period was recorded as a percentage of the pre-anoxia time period. The rationale was that both PL and TAR could be used to evaluate the hyperactivity commonly associated with starvation (Lee and Park, 2004; Johnson et al., 2010).
(B) Anoxia & Post-anoxia
Parameters during and after anoxia were used to characterize changes in susceptibility and tolerance to anoxic conditions. The parameters which evaluated susceptibility to anoxia (30 s of N2) include Time to Succumb (TS) (Fig. 2Aii). TS was measured as the time (s) from N2 onset to the point when activity fell below the recovery threshold (< 0.30 cm per second). Recovery from anoxia, denoted Time to Recovery (TR), was measured as the time taken for locomotor activity to surpass a defined threshold (0.3 cm per second) at least 10 times within 60 consecutive seconds (Xiao and Robertson, 2016). The earliest time to reach the criterion is set as TR (Fig. 2A). As normal TR occurs within 30 minutes, individuals that failed to meet the TR criterion within the 60 minute post-anoxia period were excluded in order to make comparisons between 'recovered' individuals.
Spreading Depolarization: DC potential shifts
Flies were placed head first into a disposable pipette tip, without the use of N2, and fixed in place using a small drop of wax. Using microscissors, a small window (0.06 × 0.02 mm) was made in the cuticle at the back of the head behind the ocelli (Rodriguez and Robertson, 2012). A chlorided silver wire was placed into the mid-thorax to ground the preparation. Next, a microelectrode pulled from a 1 mm diameter filamented glass capillary tube, backfilled with 1mM KAC, was inserted at an approximate 45º angle through the window into the hemolymph. Further insertion of the microelectrode, from the hemolymph to the brain, was characterized by a negative shift in the resting DC potential.
SD in the fly brain was recorded by monitoring DC potential shifts using a Model 2000 pH/ion amplifier (World Precision Instruments Inc) using the electrophysiology software Clampex for later analysis using Clampfit (Molecular Devices, version 10.3). The recording period included periods of baseline activity (10 minutes), anoxia (30 seconds of N2), and post-anoxia (20 minutes). Individuals that exhibited spontaneous, large amplitude DC shifts, which can result from damage, during the baseline recording period were discarded. Direct airflow was maintained throughout the experiment and N2 was used to induce an anoxic coma.
Spreading Depolarization Parameters
The baseline of each recording was adjusted to zero just before the start of anoxia (10 minutes) and after the major ionic disruption in order to normalize DC potential drift during the recording. The time to surge (s) was measured from the time nitrogen was turned on to the point at half-max amplitude of the abrupt negative shift in DC potential. The time to recover (s) was measured from the time nitrogen was turned off to the point of half-max amplitude on the positive shift in DC potential. The peak amplitude (mV) during the anoxia was used to quantify the magnitude of spreading depolarization.
Measurement of Mass
Adult flies were placed in a freezer (~30 min) before weighing to ensure complete immobilization, after which they were individually weighed to 1 μg using a Cahn-microbalance. Controls were weighed at the same time of day to account for potential water loss. Pupae were weighed under similar conditions. Each pupa was dissected under a light-microscope to verify sex, and genotype via eye color.
Statistical Analyses
Each locomotor activity test included all controls; for example both Gal4/+ and UAS/+ flies for genetic manipulations or drug-specific controls for flies fed AMPK pharmacology. As replicate data sets exhibited similar trends we compiled the data for statistical analyses.
Statistical analyses were performed using Sigma Plot 12.1 (Systat Software Inc.). Parametric tests performed were a t-test and one-way ANOVA when the distribution of residuals passed normality (Shapiro-Wilk). Non-parametric tests, when normality failed, included a Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test and ANOVA on Ranks (Kruskal-Wallis) with Dunn's multiple comparisons. Significance levels were set at α < 0.05 and 0.10.
Results
AMPK activation mimics starvation phenotype before and after anoxia
To evaluate phenotypic changes in locomotor behavior before, during, and after exposure to anoxia we used a high-throughput locomotor assay and open-source software to track each fly's location (Fig. 1; see also Video 1S) (Xiao and Robertson, 2015). Flies placed within the restricted locomotor chamber engaged in near constant walking (Fig. 2) [Time at Rest (TAR): 8.7 ± 2.1 %; Path Length (PL): 215.3 ± 6.5 cm]. When deprived of food for 24 hrs the flies exhibited a distinct 'starvation phenotype'. Starvation significantly decreased TAR 4.3 ± 0.36 % and increased PL 235.2 ± 5.32 cm (Mann-Whitney, U (31, 32) = 1184.5, p = 0.008; Mann-Whitney, U (31, 32) = 827, p = 0.024). When fed the AMPK activating compounds metformin and AICAR, w1118 flies exhibited an increase in PL (Metformin: t-test, t = −3.355, df = 30, p =0.001; AICAR: t-test, t = −2.088, df = 62, p =0.021), however only metformin decreased TAR (Metformin: Mann-Whitney, U (16, 16) = 62.0, p = 0.013; AICAR: Mann-Whitney, U (32, 32) = 460.5, p = 0.493). This suggests that, under normoxic conditions, pharmacological activation of AMPK has a similar effect on locomotor activity as starvation.
When exposed to brief anoxia (30 s of N2), w1118 flies undergo stereotyped movements: rapid paralysis, falling over, and inactivity. We found that the time for flies to exhibit inactivity (Time to Succumb: TS) after exposure to anoxia was not significantly different after a 24 hr period of starvation, or when fed Metformin or AICAR (Fig. 2D) (Starvation: Mann-Whitney, U (31, 32) = 463.0, p = 0.649; Metformin: Mann-Whitney, U (16, 16) = 113.0, p = 0.575; AICAR: Mann-Whitney, U (32, 32) = 1072.0, p = 0.631). Upon return to normoxia, w1118 flies starved for 24 hrs or fed AICAR had a significantly shorter time to recover locomotion (Time to Recover: TR) (Starvation: Mann-Whitney, U (25, 32) = 253.0, p = 0.018; AICAR: Mann-Whitney, U (32, 32) = 360.0, p = 0.042). While flies fed metformin showed a similar trend, treatment did not significantly affect TR (Mann-Whitney, U (16, 16) = 89.0, p = 0.147). To determine if this was due to neural mechanisms, we next investigated the effect of starvation and pharmacological activation of AMPK on ionic disruption in the brain during anoxia.
To determine if AMPK could modify CNS tolerance to anoxia we induced a 30 s anoxic coma and monitored spreading depolarization (SD) in the brain. SD refers to the loss of ion gradients induced by a failure of ion homeostasis. The rise in extracellular K+ and other ion disturbances induce a large negative shift in extracellular DC potential causing the invertebrate CNS to abruptly shut down in response to acute stress (Rodriguez and Robertson, 2012; Spong et al., 2016b). Anoxia induces SD in the fly brain, pre-anoxia positivity (1 s) and a large negative DC shift (surge) which is sustained until N2 is turned off (Fig. 3A), that is similar to anoxic depolarization in the mammalian brain (Hansen, 1985; de Crespigny et al., 1999; Lindquist and Shuttleworth, 2017). We found that the time to CNS shutdown, defined as the time to half-max amplitude of the surge (s), was significantly longer when flies were starved 24 hours or fed metformin (Fig. 3B) (Starvation: t-test, t = −1.981, df = 19, p =0.03); Metformin: t-test, t = −2.298, df = 20, p =0.016). However, flies fed AICAR, which acts as a more direct activator of AMPK, did not exhibit a longer time to surge (Mann-Whitney, U (6, 10) = 25.0, p = 0.625). We next asked if starvation or AMPK pharmacology would affect the magnitude of SD in the fly brain.
We predicted that flies with faster locomotor recovery would have smaller ionic disturbances during anoxia, enabling them to re-establish ionic gradients across cell membranes faster. What we found was that during anoxia, the peak amplitude was significantly smaller in flies fed Metformin or AICAR, but not after a 24 hr starvation period (Fig. 3C) (Metformin: Mann-Whitney, U (11, 11) = 22.0, p = 0.013; AICAR: Mann-Whitney, U (6, 10) = 14.0, p = 0.093; Starvation: t-test, t = 0.975, df = 19, p =0.17). However, following anoxia, flies emerging from an anoxic coma, defined as the time to recover half-max amplitude (s), took significantly longer when fed Metformin or AICAR (Fig. 3D) (Metformin: Mann-Whitney, U (11, 11) = 16.0, p = 0.004; AICAR: Mann-Whitney, U (6, 9) = 0.0, p = 0.002), while flies starved 24 hrs did not exhibit a difference (Mann-Whitney, U (10, 11) = 51.0, p = 0.805).
Thus, contrary to what we expected, fast locomotor recovery did not correlate directly with smaller ionic disturbance and flies with a smaller peak amplitude took longer to recover CNS ion gradients after anoxia.
Although we have shown that both starvation and the AMPK activators Metformin and AICAR were able to modulate SD dynamics in the brain during anoxia, it was unclear whether the AMPK modulation of the speed of locomotor recovery after anoxia was mediated neurally. We tested this possibility using the Drosophila Gal4/UAS system to up- or downregulate the AMPK catalytic α subunit activity in a tissue-specific manner.
AMPKα subunit required for pupation
We suspected that AMPK would be required during development as Drosophila larvae forage in a hypoxic medium (Callier et al., 2015). Complete loss of AMPKα, as seen in ampkα mutants, is lethal in late second/third instar stages (Lee et al., 2007; Swick et al., 2013). Thus, we chose to restrict RNAi manipulation of AMPKα to neurons or glia. We were intrigued to find that a panneuronal up- or down-regulation of AMPKα did not affect developmental lethality, locomotor behavior, or recovery from anoxia (Fig. 4, Table 1S). In contrast, we found flies with panglial upregulation of AMPKα had a shorter anoxic recovery time (Figure 4B) (Student-Newman-Keuls Method, Q = 3.545, 3.754, p < 0.05), however we were unable to test the effect of pan-glial AMPKα downregulation as these flies showed a male-specific lethality during pupation. As dAMPKα mutants exhibit low triglyceride levels, small fat body cells, and decreased larval size (Bland et al., 2010) we evaluated potential weight differences during pupation. We found that there was no weight difference in glial AMPK-RNAi male or female flies during pupation, consistent with a weight-independent lethality during pupation (Fig. 4F) (male pupae: ANOVA, p > 0.05; female pupae: Dunn's Method, Q = 1.926, 1.399, p > 0.05). This suggests that AMPKα may be required in glial cells to regulate pupal metamorphosis. In order to circumvent this lethality we used glial subtypes to drive AMPKα-RNAi.
Inhibition of glial AMPKα subunit induces severe metabolic defects
Despite pan-glial AMPKα-RNAi lethality, males with AMPKα-RNAi in surface glia (subperineural: NP2276) or neuropil glia (astrocyte: Alrm II, Alrm III, NP1243; ensheathing: mz0709, NP6520) survived to adulthood. We found that RNAi of AMPKα in the neuropil glial Alrm III, NP1243, mz0709 increased body weight (Fig. 4D; Alrm III: Holm-Sidak ANOVA, t (2) = 4.932, 4.639, p < 0.001; NP1243: Dunn's Method H (2) = 44.033, p < 0.05; mz0709: Holm-Sidak ANOVA, t (2) = 11.310, 10.852, p < 0.001). When we evaluated locomotor behavior, we also found that nearly all glial subytpes exhibited reduced locomotor activity (Fig. 4C; Alrm II: Holm-Sidak ANOVA, t (2) = 5.167, 3.544, p < 0.001; Alrm III: t (2) = 6.519, 4.743, p < 0.001; mz0709: Dunn's Method, Q = 6.479, 6.630, p < 0.05; NP2276: Holm-Sidak ANOVA, t (2) = 6.878, 2.079, p < 0.05; NP6520: t (2) = 6.846, 2.012, p < 0.05). While it is unclear whether reduced locomotor activity in the AMPKα-RNAi glial lines was due to increased body weight, it is clear that a loss of AMPKα in glia severely disrupts regular metabolic function.
As a higher rate of metabolism during anoxia could more rapidly deplete ATP required to maintain homeostasis (Galli and Richards, 2014), we were not surprised that a low metabolic rate phenotype - high body weight and low activity level -was associated with a significantly faster anoxic TR in the ensheathing glial line NP6520/UAS-AMPKα-RNAi (Fig. 4E; Dunn's Method, Q = 5.413, 4.189, p < 0.05). While NP6520/UAS-AMPKα-RNAi did exhibit a significantly faster TS than its controls, a phenotype not observed in the other glial subtypes, variations in TS were not associated with TR (Table 1S).
Gene-Switch line starvation phenotype
We utilized temporal and spatial downregulation of AMPKα in order to identify AMPK-dependent tissues within the fly body during starvation. We chose to target AMPKα-RNAi in the fat body, oenocytes, and tracheal cells which become transcriptionally inactivated when flies are fed RU486 (mifepristone; Sigma-Aldrich) using Gene-Switch system lines, and scored starvation-induced lethality over an 84 hour period (Osterwalder et al., 2001). Consistent with research that shows pan-neuronal upregulation of AMPK shortens survival during starvation (Ulgherait et al., 2014), we found that AMPKα downregulation in the GSG3448 (fat body, oenocytes, and tracheal cells) or GSGB9-1 (oenocytes) lines extends survival. We also found that the GSG3448 line had a lower tolerance to starvation (without RU486) (86.21% survival) after 24 hours than the GSGB9-1 (100% survival) lines (Fig. 5C,D).
AMPKα subunit affects starvation phenotype
If AMPKα was critical for one of the previously described starvation phenotypes - increased PL, reduced TAR, and fast TR - then its disruption using AMPKα-RNAi should abolish these effects. We first characterized each line's starvation phenotype. Starvation alone (without RU486) in AMPKα-RNAi Gene-Switch lines GSG3448 and GSGB9-1 caused a reduction in TAR (GSG3448: Mann-Whitney, U (30, 31) = 349, p = 0.095; GSGB9-1:t-test, t = 2.171, df = 24, p =0.020). Following anoxic exposure, the GSGB9-1 line showed a trend towards reducing TR (Table 1S), however only the combined expression line GSG3448 had a significantly reduced TR after 24 hrs of starvation (GSG3448: Mann-Whitney, U (29, 31) = 302.5, p = 0.030). This suggests, consistent with the results above, that these lines may have varying tolerance to starvation.
When feeding RU486 to inactivate AMPKα we found that only the combined expression line GSG3448 significantly affected the starvation phenotype. Starvation on agar with RU486 abolished the starvation-TAR phenotype; comparing starvation alone and starvation with RU486 (Fig. 5A) (Mann-Whitney, U (26, 31) = 296.5, p = 0.088). As well, starved GSG3448 flies no longer had a fast TR when fed RU486 (Fig. 5B) (Mann-Whitney, U (25, 31) = 291, p = 0.114). This suggests that during starvation the regulation of AMPKα through multiple tissues, either via a cooperative or an additive effect, may be required to induce a starvation phenotype.
However, as the GSG3448 line had a lower tolerance to starvation (Fig. 5C-E), we cannot rule out the possibility that AMPKα is simply upregulated more after 24 hrs of starvation than the single tissue line; resulting in a larger inhibitory effect of RU486.
Short-term AMPKα subunit down-regulation affects locomotor behavior and tolerance to anoxia
To address the acute effects of reduced AMPKα subunit in the oenocyte and fat body, flies were fed RU486 for two and four days. We found that a two day downregulation of AMPKα in the GSG3448 and GSGB9-1 lines reduced TAR, which suggests a basal level of AMPKα may be active in these tissues and that the loss of AMPKα can modify locomotor behavior (Fig. 5E; GSG3448: Mann-Whitney, U (19, 36) = 181.5, p = 0.005; GSGB9-1: Mann-Whitney, U (46, 52) = 906, p = 0.039). However, flies fed RU486 for four days do not show this effect (GSG3448: Mann-Whitney, U (30, 36) = 430, p = 0.158; GSGB9-1: Mann-Whitney, U (52, 59) = 1290, p = 0.151). This return to regular locomotor behavior indicates that under normoxic conditions the fly may attempt to compensate for a loss of basal AMPKα within these tissues. However when faced with anoxic stress, AMPKα flies fed RU486 for four days took significantly longer to recover locomotor activity (TR: Mann-Whitney, U (46, 50) = 796, p = 0.010). This suggests mechanisms of basal AMPKα compensation were unable to help the fly during anoxic stress; which may require AMPK upregulation.
Discussion
We investigated how food restriction affects the response of the nervous system to anoxia in adult Drosophila. Our main conclusions are: 1. Prior starvation speeds recovery of locomotion from an anoxic coma and this is mimicked by pharmacological treatments that would activate AMPK. 2. Collapse and restoration of ion gradients with anoxia/re-oxygenation are modulated by starvation and AMPK. This contributes little to the timing of recovery of locomotor circuit function, however, it could affect the susceptibility to SD. This remains to be determined. 3. Locomotor circuit recovery after anoxia is modulated by AMPK activity in glia, particularly the ensheathing glial subtype, rather than neurons. 4. AMPK in tissues that supply energy to the CNS (e.g. fat body, oenocytes and glia) can modulate locomotor circuit recovery and survival during periods of starvation.
We characterized a starvation phenotype of adult flies before, during, and after exposure to brief anoxia and contrasted this with the pharmacological activation of AMPK. We showed that when confined within a small arena, starving flies will modify their locomotor behavior to increase their distance travelled by spending less time inactive. A similar hyperactivity can be seen in flies fed metformin or AICAR. During anoxia, we found that starved flies are able to delay SD in the brain, however this does not affect the magnitude of SD or dynamics of the recovery of ion gradients. In contrast, flies fed metformin or AICAR display a smaller ionic disruption and prolonged recovery following SD. As both metformin and AICAR affect adenosine - (1) metformin decreases adenosine deaminase and (2) AICAR upon phosphorylation to ZMP shares structural similarities with adenosine - this finding parallels work in mammals which shows that SD impairs neurotransmission and that increased adenosine prolongs depression of electrocorticographic activity (Ouyang et al., 2011; Lindquist and Shuttleworth, 2017). Following anoxia, both pharmacological activation of AMPK and starvation improved locomotor recovery rates following anoxia. As both dietary restriction and pharmacological activators of AMPK have been previously shown to modulate oxidative stress in mammalian (Walsh et al., 2014; Shen et al., 2017) and non-mammalian organisms (Vigne et al., 2009; LaRue and Padilla, 2011), here we provide a tissue-specific evaluation of AMPK in modulating anoxic tolerance. We show that in the fly body, the oenocyte and fat body have independent and context-specific roles in anoxic tolerance, whereas glia is the sole AMPK-dependent tissue in the brain.
Starvation, AMPK in the liver and oenocytes
Under fed conditions the fly fat body is involved in the steady transfer of lipids to the oenocytes (Brasaemle, 2007). In starved flies lipids accumulate in the oenocytes (Gutierrez et al., 2007). Lipid accumulation in the fly oenocytes is thought to function similar to a mammalian liver, whereby lipids are mobilized to a reserve pool to 'fuel' ketogenesis, a process which provides an alternative energy source to the brain during energetic stress. It has been suggested that ketone bodies act as a glucose-replacing fuel, during enhanced neuronal activity, as they are preferentially used for neuronal energy (Izumi et al., 1997; Blazquez et al., 1999). It has been previously reported that ketone bodies protect the brain from hypoxia and ischemic injury (Go et al., 1988; Auestad et al., 1991). Here we provide data that show, consistent with a pathway from lipid accumulation to neuroprotective ketogenesis, that starvation modifies anoxic tolerance.
As the 'metabolic load' of the mammalian liver is split between the oencotye and fat body in flies, we sought to determine whether AMPK in these tissues affects starvation-induced anoxic tolerance. Previous work investigating lipogenesis in Drosophila has shown that AMPK acts as a master switch for lipid regulation: AMPK upregulation, through the feeding of metformin, decreases total lipid content in the fly; and AMPK downregulation via the expression of a dominant negative alpha subunit variant, increases lipid content in the fly oencoytes (Johnson et al., 2010; Slack et al., 2012). Following this logic, decreasing AMPK during starvation should increase available lipid content for ketogenenic oxidation, and further increase anoxic tolerance. However, we found that when we disrupted AMPKα in the combined fat body, oenocytes, and tracheal cells line, but not the oenocyte line, the beneficial aspects of starvation are lost. This suggests that lipid accumulation is likely not the sole factor which allows starved individuals to tolerate anoxic bouts, but rather AMPK-dependent mechanisms in the fat body. AMPK has been shown to phosphorylate acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC1, ACC2) which turns off fatty acid synthesis and turns on fatty acid oxidation in an effort to conserve energy while producing ATP (Hardie, 2007). We therefore suggest that under global energetic stress, as induced by prolonged starvation, the AMPK-dependent shutdown of energetically expensive pathways outweighs the production of alternative catabolic pathways.
In unstressed, fed conditions the disruption of AMPKα in oenocytes had a time-dependent effect on tolerance to anoxic conditions. We report that downregulation of AMPKα for two days in either the combined fat body, oenocyte, and tracheal cell or oenocyte lines increased hyperactivity, and note that this trend was diminished by day four. Our observation is consistent with multiple observations that AMPK alters locomotor behavior (Lee and Park, 2004; Johnson et al., 2010; Ahmadi and Roy, 2016; Moller et al., 2016). We suspect that by day four regular behavior returns to normal due to the upregulation of other AMPK subunits, as has been seen in mice β2 KO mice (Steinberg et al., 2010), or through an independent compensatory pathway. Despite a return to regular locomotor behavior, we found that flies with reduced AMPKα in the oenocytes alone take a longer time to recover from anoxia; suggesting even in fed conditions a prolonged reduction of AMPKα in the oencotyes affects susceptibility to anoxic stresses.
Neuronal AMPK in anoxic tolerance
While AMPK-driven ketogenesis is primarily thought to be derived from hepatic tissue, several studies have explored ketogenic machinery in neuronal tissue. In mammals AMPK is primarily expressed in neurons with some expression in astrocyte glia (Turnley et al., 1999; Culmsee et al., 2001). In particular, astrocyte glia has been shown to exhibit similar ketogenic machinery as hepatocytes (reviewed in (Guzman and Blazquez, 2004)): a preference for fatty acids over glucose as a primary metabolic fuel during ketogenesis (McGarry and Foster, 1980; Blazquez et al., 1998); carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT-I) is the metabolic pace-setting step of ketogenesis (Drynan et al., 1996; Blazquez et al., 1998); similar ketogenic inhibitors, malonyl-CoA for CPT-I and acetyl-CoA carboxylase for malonyl-CoA, are observed in both astrocytes and hepatocytes (McGarry and Brown, 1997; Blazquez et al., 1998). However, as a primary signaling molecule, AMPK has also been shown to protect against neurotoxicity (Eom et al., 2016), increase neuronal survival following glucose deprivation or chemical hypoxia (Culmsee et al., 2001), mediate macrophage phagocytosis (Quan et al., 2015), and increase autophagy post-stroke to decrease infarct volume (Shen et al., 2017), amongst other findings. While we don't address the mechanisms which modulate anoxic tolerance in Drosophila, we do report, consistent with these findings, that upregulating AMPKα in glia affects locomotor recovery following anoxia. Further, to the best of our knowledge, our finding that AMPKα neural up- or down-regulation in Drosophila does not affect post-anoxia recovery has not been previously reported. Our data in combination with work in the fly showing glial but not neural Hsp70 mitigates loss of ion homeostatis during repetitive anoxic stress (Armstrong et al., 2011), suggest that in contrast to mammalian models, in Drosophila, glia is an effective target to manipulate anoxic tolerance in the fly brain.
In addition to evaluating neuronal AMPK up-regulation in anoxia tolerance in Drosophila, we suspected RNAi knockdown would prolong locomotor recovery times. First, we found that AMPK-RNAi was shown to be lethal in pan-glial but not pan-neural tissue during pupation. As AMPK inhibition was previously shown to block glycolysis in cultured mammalian astrocytes but not neurons (Funes et al., 2014), we were not surprised to find that others have shown dsRNA directed against components of the glycolytic pathway - trehalose, aldolase, and pyruvate - resulted in late larval and early pupal lethality in pan-glial but not pan-neural tissue in Drosophila (Volkenhoff et al., 2015). To avoid AMPK-RNAi pan-glial lethality, we targeted specific glial subtypes. Contrary to what we suspected, flies seemed to recover faster from anoxia. However, nearly all glial-specific knockdown lines had lower locomotory activity and higher body weight. This finding was again consistent with Volkenhoff et al.'s 2015 work, which showed that a knockdown of components in the glyolytic pathway that did not cause lethality showed severe locomotor defects when expressed in glia. Together these findings highlight the importance of the AMPK pathway in glia but not neurons for pupal development and locomotor behavior. Unfortunately, due to the likely changes in metabolism in these lines there is little we can say about AMPK disruption during anoxia without first uncoupling the existing phenotype changes. This work raises many questions as to not only what role glial AMPK plays in pupal development, but also how AMPK functions in these glial subtypes to regulate regular metabolic rate.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
We thank Laurent Seroude for his comments on the manuscript and Adam Chippindale for access to a Cahn-microbalance to weigh flies. Funded by a Discovery Grant to RMR from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.