Article Information
History
- February 25, 2020.
Article Versions
- Version 1 (July 19, 2017 - 16:03).
- Version 2 (November 15, 2017 - 13:04).
- Version 3 (May 7, 2019 - 10:08).
- You are viewing Version 4, the most recent version of this article.
Copyright
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Author Information
- aSustainable Development and Conservation Biology Graduate Program, 1213 H.J. Patterson Hall, College Park, MD 20740, USA
- bCenter for Conservation Innovation, Defenders of Wildlife, 1130 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA
- cEnvironmental Policy Innovation Center, 777 6th Street NW, 11th Floor, Washington, DC 20036, USA
- ↵*Corresponding author: Megan Evansen, Defenders of Wildlife, 1130 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, Phone: 1-202-772-0252, Email address: mevansen{at}defenders.org
Posted February 25, 2020.
Same law, diverging practice: comparative analysis of Endangered Species Act consultations by two federal agencies
