Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Does size matter? The relationship between predictive power of single-subject morphometric networks to spatial scale and edge weight

View ORCID ProfilePradeep Reddy Raamana, View ORCID ProfileStephen C. Strother, for the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle flagship study of ageing, for The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/170381
Pradeep Reddy Raamana
1Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pradeep Reddy Raamana
  • For correspondence: praamana@research.baycrest.org
Stephen C. Strother
1Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
2Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephen C. Strother
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Network-level analysis based on anatomical, pairwise similarities (e.g., cortical thickness) has been gaining increasing attention recently. However, there has not been a systematic study of the impact of spatial scale and edge definitions on predictive performance. In order to obtain a clear understanding of relative performance, there is a need for systematic comparison. In this study, we present a histogram-based approach to construct subject-wise weighted networks that enable a principled comparison across different methods of network analysis. We design several weighted networks based on three large publicly available datasets and perform a robust evaluation of their predictive power under four levels of separability. An interesting insight generated is that changes in nodal size (spatial scale) have no significant impact on predictive power among the three classification experiments and two disease cohorts studied, i.e., mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease from ADNI, and Autism from the ABIDE dataset. We also release an open source python package called graynet to enable others to implement the novel network feature extraction algorithm, which is applicable to other modalities as well (due to its domain- and feature-agnostic nature) in diverse applications of connectivity research. In addition, the findings from the ADNI dataset are replicated in the AIBL dataset using an open source machine learning tool called neuropredict.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Data used in the preparation of this article was obtained from: 1) Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and 2) the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle flagship study of ageing (AIBL) funded by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) which was made available at the ADNI database (www.loni.usc.edu/ADNI). The ADNI and AIBL researchers contributed data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report.

  • This version has been revised extensively based on latest round of reviews from Brain Structure and Function. We have replicate the study on a 3rd dataset AIBL (another Alzheimer's dataset like ADNI), and show that our results replicate in that as well. This replication is achieved entirely with 100% open source tools: visualqc, graynet and neuropredict, further increasing the reuse and reproducibility of this study. We believe this is a big step forward for research in the study of single-subject morphological networks. Aug 2020: Introduction has been revised to communicate the focus of the paper more directly.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 06, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does size matter? The relationship between predictive power of single-subject morphometric networks to spatial scale and edge weight
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Does size matter? The relationship between predictive power of single-subject morphometric networks to spatial scale and edge weight
Pradeep Reddy Raamana, Stephen C. Strother, for the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle flagship study of ageing, for The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
bioRxiv 170381; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/170381
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Does size matter? The relationship between predictive power of single-subject morphometric networks to spatial scale and edge weight
Pradeep Reddy Raamana, Stephen C. Strother, for the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle flagship study of ageing, for The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
bioRxiv 170381; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/170381

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2512)
  • Biochemistry (4957)
  • Bioengineering (3456)
  • Bioinformatics (15144)
  • Biophysics (6867)
  • Cancer Biology (5365)
  • Cell Biology (7692)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4509)
  • Ecology (7117)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10192)
  • Genetics (7494)
  • Genomics (9756)
  • Immunology (4807)
  • Microbiology (13152)
  • Molecular Biology (5113)
  • Neuroscience (29317)
  • Paleontology (203)
  • Pathology (833)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1458)
  • Physiology (2123)
  • Plant Biology (4722)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1004)
  • Synthetic Biology (1336)
  • Systems Biology (3996)
  • Zoology (767)