Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Categorical Biases in Human Occipitoparietal Cortex

View ORCID ProfileEdward F. Ester, View ORCID ProfileThomas C. Sprague, View ORCID ProfileJohn T. Serences
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/170845
Edward F. Ester
Department of Psychology, Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, and FAU Brain Institute, Florida Atlantic University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Edward F. Ester
  • For correspondence: eester@fau.edu
Thomas C. Sprague
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas C. Sprague
John T. Serences
Department of Psychology, Neurosciences Graduate Program, and Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John T. Serences
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Categorization allows organisms to generalize existing knowledge to novel stimuli and to discriminate between physically similar yet conceptually different stimuli. Humans, nonhuman primates, and rodents can readily learn arbitrary categories defined by low-level visual features, and learning distorts perceptual sensitivity for category-defining features such that differences between physically similar yet categorically distinct exemplars are enhanced while differences between equally similar but categorically identical stimuli are reduced. We report a basis for these distortions in human occipitoparietal cortex. In three experiments, we used an inverted encoding model to recover population-level representations of stimuli from multivoxel and multi-electrode patterns of human brain activity while human participants (both sexes) classified continuous stimulus sets into discrete groups. In each experiment, reconstructed representations of to-be-categorized stimuli were systematically biased towards the center of the appropriate category. These biases were largest for exemplars near a category boundary, predicted participants’ overt category judgments, emerged shortly after stimulus onset, and could not be explained by mechanisms of response selection or motor preparation. Collectively, our findings suggest that category learning can influence processing at the earliest stages of cortical visual processing.

Significance Statement Category learning enhances perceptual sensitivity for physically similar yet categorically different stimuli. We report a possible mechanism for these distortions in human occipitoparietal cortex.. In three experiments, we used an inverted encoding model to recover population-level representations of stimuli from multivariate patterns in occipitoparietal cortex while participants categorized sets of continuous stimuli into discrete groups. The recovered representations were systematically biased by category membership, with larger biases for exemplars adjacent to a category boundary. These results suggest that mechanisms of categorization shape information processing at the earliest stages of the visual system.

Footnotes

  • Addition of Experiment 3, eye movement control analyses, revision of discussion section.

  • https://osf.io/xzay8/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 14, 2019.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Categorical Biases in Human Occipitoparietal Cortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
Share
Categorical Biases in Human Occipitoparietal Cortex
Edward F. Ester, Thomas C. Sprague, John T. Serences
bioRxiv 170845; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/170845
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Categorical Biases in Human Occipitoparietal Cortex
Edward F. Ester, Thomas C. Sprague, John T. Serences
bioRxiv 170845; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/170845

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (1641)
  • Biochemistry (2721)
  • Bioengineering (1902)
  • Bioinformatics (10201)
  • Biophysics (4174)
  • Cancer Biology (3202)
  • Cell Biology (4522)
  • Clinical Trials (135)
  • Developmental Biology (2831)
  • Ecology (4447)
  • Epidemiology (2041)
  • Evolutionary Biology (7213)
  • Genetics (5463)
  • Genomics (6793)
  • Immunology (2379)
  • Microbiology (7462)
  • Molecular Biology (2978)
  • Neuroscience (18529)
  • Paleontology (135)
  • Pathology (472)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (776)
  • Physiology (1147)
  • Plant Biology (2692)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (679)
  • Synthetic Biology (885)
  • Systems Biology (2840)
  • Zoology (465)