Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Can CRISPR-based gene drive be confined in the wild? A question for molecular and population biology

John M. Marshall, Omar S. Akbari
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/173914
John M. Marshall
1Divisions of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: john.marshall@berkeley.edu oakbari@ucr.edu
Omar S. Akbari
2Department of Entomology and Riverside Center for Disease Vector Research, Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: john.marshall@berkeley.edu oakbari@ucr.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The recent discovery of CRISPR and its application as a gene editing tool has enabled a range of gene drive systems to be engineered with much greater ease. In order for the benefits of this technology to be realized, drive systems must be developed that are capable of both spreading into populations to achieve their desired impact, and being recalled in the event of unwanted consequences or public disfavor. We review the performance of three broad categories of drive systems at achieving these goals - threshold-dependent drives, homing-based drive and remediation systems, and temporally self-limiting systems such as daisy-chain drives.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 09, 2017.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Can CRISPR-based gene drive be confined in the wild? A question for molecular and population biology
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Can CRISPR-based gene drive be confined in the wild? A question for molecular and population biology
John M. Marshall, Omar S. Akbari
bioRxiv 173914; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/173914
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Can CRISPR-based gene drive be confined in the wild? A question for molecular and population biology
John M. Marshall, Omar S. Akbari
bioRxiv 173914; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/173914

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4095)
  • Biochemistry (8784)
  • Bioengineering (6492)
  • Bioinformatics (23380)
  • Biophysics (11765)
  • Cancer Biology (9166)
  • Cell Biology (13285)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7421)
  • Ecology (11382)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15112)
  • Genetics (10408)
  • Genomics (14017)
  • Immunology (9136)
  • Microbiology (22088)
  • Molecular Biology (8792)
  • Neuroscience (47423)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1422)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2483)
  • Physiology (3710)
  • Plant Biology (8060)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1433)
  • Synthetic Biology (2213)
  • Systems Biology (6020)
  • Zoology (1251)