New Results

Knockdown of Hypocretin/Orexin Attenuates Extended-Access Cocaine Self-Administration in Rats

Brooke E. Schmeichel, Alessandra Matzeu, Pascale Koebel, Leandro F. Vendruscolo, Brigitte L. Kieffer, George F. Koob, Rémi Martin-Fardon, Candice Contet
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/184911

Abstract

The hypocretin/orexin (HCRT) neuropeptide system regulates feeding, arousal state, stress responses, and reward, especially under conditions of enhanced motivational relevance. In particular, HCRT neurotransmission facilitates drug-seeking behavior in circumstances that demand increased effort and/or motivation to take the drug. The present study used a shRNA-encoding adeno-associated viral vector to knockdown Hcrt expression throughout the dorsal hypothalamus in adult rats and determine the role of HCRT in cocaine self-administration. Longterm Hcrt silencing did not impact cocaine self-administration under short-access conditions, but robustly attenuated cocaine intake during extended self-administration access, a model that mimics key features of compulsive cocaine-taking. In addition, Hcrt silencing decreased motivation for both cocaine and palatable food (i.e., sweetened condensed milk; SCM) under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement, but did not alter responding for SCM under a fixed ratio schedule. Importantly, Hcrt silencing did not affect food or water consumption, and had no consequence to general measures of arousal-dependent behaviors. At the molecular level, longterm Hcrt knockdown moderately reduced the downstream expression of dynorphin (DYN) and melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) in the dorsal hypothalamus. These original findings support the hypothesis that HCRT neurotransmission promotes operant responding for both drug and non-drug rewards, preferentially under conditions requiring a high degree of motivation. Furthermore, the current study provides compelling evidence for the involvement of the HCRT system in cocaine self-administration also under low-effort conditions in rats allowed extended access, possibly via functional interactions with DYN and MCH signaling.

Introduction

Independently discovered in 1998 by de Lecea and Sakurai, hypocretin/orexin peptides hypocretin-1 (HCRT-1, also ORX-A) and hypocretin-2 (HCRT-2, also ORX-B), are derived from a common precursor, prepro-HCRT. These HCRT neuropeptides are synthesized in well-defined subregions of the dorsal hypothalamus: lateral hypothalamus proper, dorsomedial hypothalamus, and perifornical area (de Lecea et al, 1998; Peyron et al, 1998; Sakurai et al, 1998). HCRT projections are found throughout the brain and in regions known for their involvement in arousal, stress, and drug and non-drug reinforcement. These areas include, but are not limited to, the central amygdala, nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmental area, arcuate nucleus and paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (Baldo et al, 2003; Nambu et al, 1999; Peyron et al, 1998; Schmitt et al, 2012). HCRT neuropeptides bind two G-protein-coupled receptors, HCRT-receptor 1 and -receptor 2 (HCRT-R1 and HCRT-R2, respectively; Sakurai et al, 1998) that also are distributed widely throughout the brain (Marcus et al, 2001; Trivedi et al, 1998). Accordingly, the HCRT system is involved in a multitude of physiological functions, such as the regulation of feeding, arousal, sleep/wake states, stress responses, energy homeostasis, and reward (for review, see Berridge and España, 2005; Boutrel and de, 2008; Johnson et al, 2010; Tsujino and Sakurai, 2009).

An abundant body of literature demonstrates the critical importance of HCRT transmission in the consumption and seeking of various reinforcers, including cocaine (Boutrel et al, 2005; España et al, 2010; Hollander et al, 2012; Martin-Fardon and Weiss, 2014a; Muschamp et al, 2014; Prince et al, 2015; Smith et al, 2009, 2010; Wang et al, 2009; Zhou et al, 2012; Martin-Fardon et al, 2016; Schmeichel et al, 2016), nicotine (Hollander et al, 2008; LeSage et al, 2010; Plaza-Zabala et al, 2010, 2013), alcohol (Anderson et al, 2014; Brown et al, 2013; Dhaher et al, 2010; Jupp et al, 2011; Lopez et al, 2016; Martin-Fardon and Weiss, 2014b; Olney et al, 2015), heroin (Schmeichel et al, 2015; Smith and Aston-Jones, 2012), sucrose, and saccharin (Cason and Aston-Jones, 2013a, 2013b; Olney et al, 2015). Importantly, HCRT-receptor blockade generally does not influence drug self-administration under continuous, low-effort reinforcement, but rather blocks self-administration when the contingency of reinforcement requires higher levels of motivation to acquire the drug (Mahler et al, 2014). However, recent studies have indicated that acute blockade of HCRT signaling reduces not only the appetitive aspect but also the consummatory aspect of drug taking in dependent animals (Lopez et al, 2016; Schmeichel et al, 2015, 2016).

The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of HCRT neurotransmission in cocaine self-administration when rats are given extended-access to the drug. The extended-access model produces a gradual escalation of cocaine self-administration and an increased motivation to obtain cocaine, along with increases in brain self-stimulation thresholds during withdrawal, stress reactivity, resistance to punishment and reinstatement susceptibility (Ahmed et al, 2002; Ahmed and Koob, 1998; Aujla et al, 2008; Jonkman et al, 2012; Mantsch et al, 2004, 2008; Orio et al, 2009; Pelloux et al, 2007; Vanderschuren and Everitt, 2004; Wee et al, 2008). To examine the role of HCRT transmission in this model, Hcrt expression was silenced longterm throughout the dorsal hypothalamus of adult rats using a short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-encoding adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector. To further investigate the function of HCRT in reward consumption and potentially dissociate its role in regulating motivation for drug versus food, the effects of Hcrt silencing on self-administration of a highly palatable food reinforcer (sweetened condensed milk, SCM), as well as for regular food pellets and water, were assessed. In addition, given the modulatory role of HCRT in a multitude of behavioral and physiological functions, locomotor activity, anxiety-like behavior, and stress-induced analgesia and corticosterone response were measured to further evaluate the specificity of the behavioral consequences of Hcrt knockdown. Finally, molecular adaptations to prolonged reduction in HCRT signaling were investigated by analyzing the expression of prodynorphin (PDYN) and melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH), two neuropeptides also synthesized in the dorsal hypothalamus.

Material and Methods

Animals

Forty adult male Wistar rats (Charles River, Raleigh, NC), weighing between 225-275 g at the beginning of the experiments, were housed in groups of 2-3 per cage in a temperature-controlled (22ºC) vivarium on a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle (lights on at 18:00 h) with ad libitum access to food and water. The rats acclimated to the animal facility for at least 7 days before surgery. All procedures adhered to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of The Scripps Research Institute.

Viral Vectors

Recombinant shRNA-encoding AAV vectors were produced using an AAV helper-free system (Stratagene, France; as described in Darcq et al, 2011). In these vectors, the shRNA sequence is expressed under the control of the mU6 promoter, while the enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) is expressed under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter to label transduced cells. The shRNA sequence targeting the Hcrt transcript (shHCRT; 5’-GTCTTCTATCCCTGTCCTAGT-3’) was selected using the BLOCK-iT RNAi Designer algorithm (ThermoFisher). A scrambled sequence (shSCR; 5’-GCTTACTTTCGGCTCTCTACT-3’) was used as negative control. Loop sequence was 5’-AGTCGACA-3’ for both. An AAV2 serotype (titer of 7.4 x 1011GU/mL) was used to characterize the time-course of Hcrt knockdown, while AAV5 vectors (titers of 2.4 x 1012 for shHCRT and 2.6 x 1012 GU/mL for shSCR) were used for all behavioral experiments.

AAV Injections

Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (1-3%), mounted in a stereotaxic frame (Kopf Instruments, Tujiunga, CA). A stainless steel 30-gauge double injector was used to inject viral vectors at two mediolateral levels (AP -2.9 mm and ML ± 0.5/1.75 mm from bregma, and DV - 8.7 mm from dura; Paxinos and Watson, 2013). Bilateral injections of AAV5-shSCR or AAV5-shHCRT were performed for all behavioral experiments. Unilateral injections of AAV2-shHCRT were performed for Hcrt knockdown time-course characterization, with brains collected 2 weeks (n = 3), 4 weeks (n = 2), or 6 weeks (n = 3) after AAV2 injection (see Supplementary Figure S1). Injections were made using a micro-infusion pump (Harvard 22 Syringe Pump, Holliston, MA) with a flow rate of 0.5 μl/min over 4 min (2 μl/site). Injectors remained in place for 10 min to assure adequate diffusion of the solution and prevent backflow along the injector track.

Experimental Design

Three distinct cohorts were used to test the effect of long-term Hcrt silencing on cocaine self-administration under short-and long-access schedules (n = 8 each shSCR and shHCRT, three rats were excluded from each group due to misplaced injections and/or catheter patency failures), SCM self-administration (n = 6 each shSCR and shHCRT, one rat was excluded from each group due to misplaced injections), and general behavior (n = 6 each shSCR and shHCRT, one rat was excluded from each group due to misplaced injections. General behavioral testing included food/water self-administration, locomotor activity, anxiety-like behavior, and stress-induced analgesia and corticosterone response). The timeline of all behavioral testing in each cohort is shown in Supplementary Figure S2. Behavioral testing resumed 2-3 weeks after AAV5 injection and was conducted during the dark phase of the circadian cycle, unless otherwise noted.

Cocaine Self-administration

Rats were surgically prepared with indwelling jugular vein catheters (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) and intravenous self-administration sessions were conducted as previously described (Wee et al, 2012; Zorrilla et al, 2012; see Supplementary Methods). Briefly, rats were trained to press one of the two levers on a fixed ratio 1 (FR1) schedule of reinforcement to obtain 0.1 ml of cocaine (0.50 mg/kg/infusion) per response in 1 h sessions. After the acquisition of cocaine self-administration, rats were injected with AAV vectors and allowed to recover for approximately 2 weeks (see Figure S1A). Rats were then given short access (ShA; 1 h) to cocaine self-administration for 11 sessions and then transitioned to long access (LgA; 6 h) to cocaine for an additional 14 sessions (Figure S2A). Testing under a progressive ratio (PR; see Supplementary Methods) schedule of reinforcement occurred following LgA sessions.

Sweetened Condensed Milk (SCM) Self-administration

SCM (Nestlé USA, Inc., Solon, OH) self-administration training occurred in daily 30-min sessions on a FR1 TO20 schedule of reinforcement, prior to AAV5 injection. Sessions were initiated by the extension of both levers into the operant chamber, and responses on the active lever resulted in the delivery of SCM (0.1 ml; 2:1 v/v in water) into a drinking receptacle. Responses on the inactive lever were recorded but had no scheduled consequences. Following AAV injection, the rats were allowed to recover for 3 weeks after which SCM selfadministration resumed in 24 daily 30-min sessions (see Figure S2B). The rats were then tested on a PR schedule of reinforcement using the same ratio described for cocaine.

Food/water Self-administration

Rats underwent three food/water self-administration sessions (22 h/day, 11 h dark/11 h light), preceded by two days of habituation. Operant boxes (22 cm x 22 cm x 35 cm) were equipped with two holes. Rats were allowed to make nose poke responses in order to obtain food pellets (MLab Rodent Tablet 45 mg, TestDiet) from the pellet dispenser (hole on right wall; FR3) or 0.1 ml water from the water dispenser (hole on left wall; FR1). Responses were detected by photobeams mounted in the holes and recorded automatically. Between sessions, animals stayed in their home cage. Food/water self-administration was examined before and after AAV5 injection (Figure S2C).

Locomotor Activity

Locomotor activity was tested in photocell-equipped wire mesh cages holding two photobeams along the lateral walls. Locomotor activity was recorded for three consecutive days (22 h/day). Food and water were available ad libitum. Computer-recorded photobeam breaks were analyzed as a measure of locomotor activity. Crossovers were defined as two consecutive photobeam breaks as the rat moved from front to rear of cage, or vice versa. Detailed descriptions of procedures are provided in the Supplementary Methods. Locomotor activity was monitored before and after AAV5 injection (Figure S2C).

Elevated Plus Maze

The elevated plus maze apparatus (Kinder Scientific, Poway, CA) comprised four arms (two closed and two open arms). At the beginning of the test, each rat was placed in the center of the maze facing a closed arm and behavior was video recorded for 5 min. Between rats, the apparatus was cleaned with water and dried. Detailed descriptions of procedures are provided in the Supplementary Methods. Time (seconds) spent in each arm was recorded. Elevated plus maze was tested only after AVV5 injection (Figure S2C).

Stress-induced Analgesia Testing

Stress-induced analgesia testing was conducted as previously described (Vendruscolo et al, 2004; detailed descriptions of procedures are provided in the Supplementary Methods). Briefly, each rat was placed individually on a hot plate set to 54°C. Time (s) to hind-paw lick was recorded, with a cut-off time of 60 s. One hot plate test was conducted before the forced swim test (PRE) and one test 10 min following forced swim (POST). For forced swim, rats were individually placed in a Plexiglas cylinder filled with water for 5 min. Water was replaced between subjects. Rats underwent stress-induced analgesia testing only after AVV5 injection (Figure S2C).

Plasma corticosterone

Two hours following the elevated plus maze testing (pre-swim condition) and 20 min after the forced swim test (post-swim condition) blood samples were collected for corticosterone measurements (Figure S2C). In brief, rats were restrained and tail blood (approximately 0.2 ml) was collected into tubes coated with a 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution and centrifuged immediately. Plasma was isolated and stored at -80°C. Plasma corticosterone concentrations were determined using a Corticosterone Enzyme Assay Kit (Arbor Assays, Ann Arbor, MI) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Immunohistochemistry

Detailed descriptions of immunohistochemical procedures and cell counting are provided in the Supplementary Methods. Briefly, rats were transcardially perfused with paraformaldehyde, brains were post-fixed, and six series of 40 μm coronal sections were collected in vials. For each behavioral cohort, two series were processed for immunohistochemistry using antibodies directed against GFP (Abcam; 1:10,000) and preproHCRT (EMD Millipore; 1:1000). In the cohort used for general behavior testing, a third series was used to analyze MCH immunoreactivity (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:1000). GFP immunoreactivity was used to evaluate the location and extent of viral transduction in each rat at the end of the experiment and was consistently identified throughout the HCRT neuronal field (dorsal hypothalamus). HCRT-positive and MCH-positive cells were counted manually at 20x magnification.

In situ hybridization

Brains were snap-frozen in isopentane and ten series of 20 μm coronal cryostat sections were collected on Superfrost Plus slides. Three series were processed for in situ hybridization with probes directed against GFP, preproHCRT (Hcrt), and prodynorphin (Pdyn) mRNAs. Plasmids containing the rat Hcrt and Pdyn cDNAs were kindly donated by Dr. Joel Elmquist at UT Southwestern (Elias et al, 2001; Sakurai et al, 1998). Digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled riboprobes were synthesized using a kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Chromogenic in situ hybridization was conducted as described in Herman et al, 2015. The GFP signal was used to define the boundaries of viral transduction in each brain section. Numbers of Hcrt-positive and Pdyn-positive cells in adjacent sections were then counted within the transduced area using Stereo Investigator (MBF Bioscience) at 20x magnification.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). All data are expressed as means and standard errors of the mean (+SEM). Cell counts from the knockdown time-course experiment were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, with viral vector (shHCRT-injected versus non-injected control side) as within-subjects factor and time (2, 4 and 6 weeks) as between-subjects factor. Fixed ratio self-administration, locomotor activity, hot plate, and corticosterone data were analyzed using a repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with viral vector treatment (shHCRT and shSCR) as the between-subjects factor and time as the within-subjects factor. When appropriate, post hoc comparisons were performed using Sidak's multiple-comparison test. Cell counts in behavioral cohorts and elevated plus maze data were analyzed using an unpaired, two-tailed Student's t test. Progressive ratio self-administration data were analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U Test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests.

Results

Characterization of Hcrt knockdown

The AAV5 transduction spread and knockdown efficiency were verified in each rat at the end of each behavioral experiment. GFP immunoreactivity was consistently identified throughout the HCRT neuronal field (Figure 1A). Bilateral injections of AAV5-shHCRT robustly silenced HCRT expression (Figure 1B, C). The number of HCRT cells was reduced by more than 80% compared to shSCR rats in each behavioral cohort (Figure 1D, t(8) = 6.42, p < 0.001; Figure 1E, t(8) = 5.10, p < 0.001; Figure 1F, t(8) = 4.13, p < 0.01).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Histological characterization of viral transduction and quantification of Hcrt knockdown. Rats received double bilateral injections of AAV5-shSCR or AAV5-shHCRT (n = 5, each) and were then subjected to behavioral testing. Brains were collected at the end of each experiment for verification of viral transduction by GFP immunohistochemistry (A, brown precipitate). The area of GFP expression consistently encompassed the entire hypothalamus, including areas known to contain HCRT neurons (i.e., lateral hypothalamus proper, perifornical area, and dorsomedial hypothalamus). Adjacent sections were processed for prepro-HCRT immunolabeling (B-C, blue-gray precipitate) to quantify HCRT knockdown in each rat. (A-C) Images were captured at a 5x magnification, scale bar = 250 μm. Ventral-most end of injector track is indicated with arrows. fx, fornix; V3, third ventricle. (D-F) shHCRT reduced the number of HCRT neurons by more than 80% in all three cohorts. Bars represent the mean (+SEM) number of preproHCRT-immunoreactive (HCRT-ir) neurons (left axis) and the percentage of the control group (shSCR; right axis) across three coronal sections. **p<0.01 versus shSCR.

Hcrt knockdown reduces low-effort cocaine self-administration selectively in dependent rats

There was no significant difference between shHCRT or shSCR (n = 5, each) rats in ShA cocaine self-administration under an FR1 schedule (Figure 2A; Group: F(1,9)= 2.43, p= 0.15.; Session: F(10,90)= 0.70, p= 0.72; Group x session: F(10,90)= 0.47, p= 0.91). However, upon LgA to cocaine self-administration, shHCRT significantly attenuated cocaine self-administration under both an FR1 schedule (Figure 2B; Group: F(1,8)= 6.24, p < 0.05; Session: F(13,104)= 1.07, p= 0.39; Group x session: F(13,104)= 1.09, p= 0.38) and a PR schedule of reinforcement (Figure 2C; U(8) = 0, Z = 2.51, p < 0.05). These results indicate that HCRT transmission contributes to cocaine selfadministration under low-effort conditions in extended-access rats, but not in limited-access rats.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Long-term Hcrt knockdown reduces cocaine self-administration in dependent rats. (AB) Symbols represent mean number of cocaine rewards (+SEM) per session. AAV5-shHCRT (n = 5) had no effect on cocaine intake over 11 sessions of short access self-administration (A; 1 h; Session 1-11), whereas it significantly reduced cocaine intake over 14 sessions of long access self-administration (B; 6 h; Session 12-25) compared to AAV5-shSCR (n = 5). *p<0.05 versus shSCR. (C) Bars represent mean PR breakpoints (+SEM; left axis) and cumulative presses (+SEM; right axis). shHCRT rats showed significantly reduced cocaine intake on a PR schedule of reinforcement compared to shSCR rats. **p<0.01 versus shSCR.

Hcrt knockdown reduces SCM self-administration under PR reinforcement

There was no significant difference between shHCRT or shSCR (n = 5, each) rats in SCM self-administration under an FR1 schedule (Figure 3A; Group: F(1,8)= 1.07, p= 0.33; Session: F(11,88)= 1.71, p= 0.08; Group x session: F(11,88)= 0.50, p= 0.90). In contrast, Hcrt knockdown significantly attenuated responding for SCM under a PR schedule of reinforcement (Figure 3B; U(8) = 2.50, Z = 1.98, p < 0.05). These results indicate that the influence of HCRT on the self-administration of palatable food by sated rats is restricted to high-effort conditions.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Long-term Hcrt knockdown reduces sweetened condensed milk self-administration only under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. (A) Symbols represent mean number of sweetened condensed milk (SCM) rewards (+SEM) per session. AAV5-shHCRT (n = 5) had no effect on SCM intake over 24 sessions of self-administration (30 min) compared to AAV5-shSCR (n = 5). (B) Bars represent mean PR breakpoints (+SEM; left axis) and cumulative presses (+SEM; right axis). shHCRT rats did show significantly reduced SCM intake on a PR schedule of reinforcement compared to shSCR rats. *p<0.05 versus shSCR.

Hcrt knockdown has no effect on general behavior

There was no significant difference between shHCRT or shSCR (n = 5, each) rats in body weight or food pellet self-administration under an FR3 schedule (Figure 4A and B; Body weight: Group: F(1,8)= 0.63, p= 0.45; Time: F(5,40)= 159.1, p < 0.001; Group x time: F(5,40)= 0.46, p= 0.79; Food: Group: F(1,8)= 3.48, p= 0.10; Time: F(1,8)= 130.50, p < 0.001; Group x time: F(1,8)= 0.003, p= 0.96). Similarly, there was no significant difference between shHCRT-and shSCR-treated rats in water self-administration under an FR1 schedule (Figure 4C; Group: F(1,8)= 1.16, p= 0.31; Time: F(1,8)= 118.20, p < 0.001; Group x time: F(1,8)= 1.30, p= 0.29). There was also no significant effect of shHCRT injection on number of crossovers in the activity box compared to shSCR-treated control rats (Figure 4D; Group: F(1,8)= 2.20, p= 0.18; Condition: F(3,24)= 30.53, p < 0.001; Group x condition: F(3,24)= 0.002, p= 0.96) or on the percentage of time spent in the open arms of the elevated plus maze (Figure 4E; t(8)= 0.46, p= 0.66). Additionally, shHCRT rats showed no significant difference in latency to thermal nociception on the hot plate test prior to forced-swim stress compared to shSCR rats, and stress produced an equivalent analgesic effect in shHCRT and shSCR rats (Figure 4F; Group: F(1,8)= 0.31, p= 0.59; Condition: F(1,8)= 86.45, p < 0.001; Group x condition: F(1,8)= 1.21, p= 0.30). Finally, there was no significant effect of Hcrt knockdown on basal and stress-stimulated corticosterone release (Figure 4G; Group: F(1,8)= 0.45, p= 0.52; Condition: F(1,8)= 11.97, p < 0.01; Group x condition: F(1,8)= 0.92, p= 0.37). Altogether, these data indicate that there is no effect of shHCRT on food/water intake, locomotion, or on measures of anxiety or stress responses in the absence of cocaine. These results demonstrate that the effects of Hcrt knockdown on cocaine and SCM self-administration cannot be attributed to a non-specific disruption of behavioral performance or basal stress sensitivity.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Long-term Hcrt knockdown has no effect on general measures of behavior and physiology. (A) Symbols represent mean body weight (g) each week following AAV5-shHCRT or AAV5-shSCR injection (Week 0). There was no significant difference in body weight between shHCRT and shSCR rats (n = 5, each). (B-C) Bars represent the mean number of food pellet (B) or water (C) rewards (+SEM) per 11h time epoch. There was no significant difference between shHCRT and shSCR rats in number of food pellets (FR3) or water (FR1) rewards in either the light or dark phase of the circadian cycle. **p<0.01 versus LIGHT. (D) Bars represent the mean number of crossovers (+SEM) in a locomotor activity box per 11h time epoch. There was no significant difference between shHCRT and shSCR rats in number of crossovers in either the light or dark phase. **p<0.01 versus LIGHT. (E) Bars represent percentage of time spent in the open arms (+SEM) of an elevated plus-maze. There was no significant difference in anxietylike behavior between shHCRT and shSCR rats. (F) Bars represent time (sec; +SEM) to hind paw lick on a 54°C hotplate prior to (PRE) or following (POST) forced swim stressor. There was a significant main effect of stress resulting in an increase of withdrawal latency time following forced swim (stress-induced analgesia), but no significant difference between shHCRT and shSCR rats. **p<0.01 versus PRE. (G) Bars represent mean plasma corticosterone levels (ng/ml; + SEM) prior to (PRE) or following (POST) forced swim stressor. There was a significant effect of stress on corticosterone release, but no significant difference between shHCRT and shSCR rats. **p<0.01 versus PRE.

Adaptations in local neuropeptide expression

Molecular adaptations of two additional neuronal populations intermingled with HCRT neurons in the dorsal hypothalamus, PDYN and MCH, were analyzed (Figures 5 and 6, respectively). Pdyn mRNA expression in the dorsal (i.e., dorsomedial hypothalamus and lateral hypothalamic area) and ventral (i.e., ventromedial hypothalamus and arcuate nucleus) parts of the hypothalamus (Figure 5A) was examined in adjacent sections of brains analyzed for the time-course of Hcrt knockdown using the AAV2 serotype. Longterm Hcrt knockdown significantly reduced Pdyn expression in the dorsal part of the hypothalamus where Pdyn is expressed by HCRT neurons 4 weeks following shHCRT injection (Figure 5B; Group: F(1,5)= 46.75, p< 0.01.; Time: F(2,5)= 3.33, p= 0.12; Group x time: F(2,5)= 2.96, p= 0.14), but not in the ventral part of the hypothalamus where there are no HCRT neurons (Figure 5C; Group: F(1,5)= 0.82, p= 0.41.; Time: F(2,5)= 1.51, p= 0.31; Group x time: F(2,5)= 0.15, p= 0.87). MCH-immunoreactivity was examined in adjacent brain sections from the third, general behavior cohort (Figure 6). There was a nonsignificant trend for a reduction in the number of MCH-positive neurons within the dorsal hypothalamus following long-term Hcrt knockdown (Figure 6B, t(8) = 1.98, p = 0.08).

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Histological characterization and time-course quantification of Pdyn expression following Hcrt knockdown. Rats received unilateral double injections of AAV2-shHCRT, with the contralateral hemisphere used as a control site, and brains were collected 2, 4, or 6 weeks later (n = 2-3 per time-point). Pdyn (A) expression was examined on sections using in situ hybridization. V3, third ventricle; scale bar = 500 μm. The number of PDYN+ cells was then quantified within the HCRT neuronal field (i.e., dorsal hypothalamus; blue outline) and on PDYN neurons located more ventrally (orange outline). (B-C) Bars are mean cell counts represented as a percentage of the control hemisphere (% of Control; +SEM) across three coronal sections. (B) HCRT knockdown was accompanied by a concomitant reduction in the number of PDYN-positive neurons in the dorsal hypothalamus (blue outline) at the 4-week time-point. (C) The viral vector had no effect on PDYN neurons located more ventrally (orange outline). Dashed horizontal line is percentage of control averaged over 3 time-points (gray shade ±SEM). **p<0.01 versus contralateral control hemisphere (right).

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Histological characterization and quantification of MCH cells following Hcrt knockdown. Adjacent tissue sections from behavior cohort were processed for MCH-positive immunolabeling. (A) Representative photomicrograph of MCH-immunostaining. V3, third ventricle; scale bar = 500 μm. MCH-immunoreactive (MCH-ir) cells were counted bilaterally within the dorsal hypothamalmus (boxed area) in AAV5-shSCR and AAV5-shHCRT-treated animals (n = 5, each). (B) Long-term Hcrt knockdown has no effect on MCH-ir cells. Bars represent the mean (+SEM) number of MCH-ir neurons (left axis) or the percentage of the control group (shSCR; right axis) across three coronal sections

Discussion

The HCRT system has been implicated in the motivation to consume and seek drugs of abuse, but its role in extended-access drug-taking associated with compulsive-like cocaine use is poorly understood. Here, a genetic approach was used to probe the role of HCRT neurotransmission in extended-access cocaine self-administration. Efficient, long-lasting knockdown of Hcrt expression throughout the dorsal hypothalamus was achieved by virally-mediated RNA interference in a rat model, circumventing the need to chronically administer HCRT-receptor antagonists. Our results confirm previous pharmacological evidence that HCRT neurotransmission promotes operant responding for both drug and non-drug rewards under motivationally salient, high-effort conditions (Borgland 2009; Mahler et al, 2014). Furthermore, the present study demonstrates that HCRT neurotransmission contributes to cocaine intake even under a low-effort contingency when access to cocaine self-administration is extended. Altogether, these data provide novel insights into the role of HCRT in drug use under conditions of pathologic motivation, and validates virally-mediated Hcrt silencing as a valuable approach to investigate the behavioral relevance of HCRT neurotransmission in rodent models.

A role for HCRT in the transition to cocaine addiction-like behavior

Our finding that Hcrt knockdown did not affect cocaine self-administration under low-effort conditions (FR1 schedule of reinforcement) in rats offered 1 h daily access to the drug corroborates previous pharmacological studies. HCRT-R1 antagonists show no or minimal effects on low-effort, FR1 responding for cocaine self-administration in animals allowed limited access to cocaine (España et al, 2010; Schmeichel et al, 2016; Smith et al, 2009). Likewise, intracerebral injection of HCRT-1 does not affect FR1 responding for cocaine (Boutrel et al, 2005; España et al, 2011). Furthermore, the lack of effect on FR1 responding under short access to cocaine conditions in the current studies is not likely attributed to a lack of Hcrt silencing at time of testing (i.e., 2-3 weeks) as we confirmed a nearly 85% knockdown of Hcrt as soon as two weeks following AAV injection (see Figure S1). Altogether, the genetic approach used in the current studies lends further support to the hypothesis that HCRT transmission is not necessary for the primary rewarding effects of the drug under conditions of low incentive-motivation.

In contrast, Hcrt silencing strongly reduced FR1 cocaine responding in extended-access rats. This finding suggests, that HCRT neurotransmission may contribute to the activation of stress systems and subsequent dampening of reward systems that are associated with extended access to cocaine self-administration and are hypothesized to drive excessive, compulsive-like cocaine taking in addiction (for review, Koob et al, 2014). In support of this, central infusion of HCRT-1 peptide increases thresholds of intracranial self-stimulation, a rate-independent measure of brain reward sensitivity (Boutrel et al, 2005; Hata et al, 2011), suggesting an inhibitory action on reward systems. Furthermore, central HCRT-1 administration reinstates previously extinguished drug-seeking, whereas HCRT-R1 antagonism readily blocks stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking (Boutrel et al, 2005; Harris et al, 2005; Martin-Fardon et al, 2010; Matzeu et al, 2016; Schmeichel et al, 2016; Wang et al, 2009; Zhou et al, 2012). Both preclinical and clinical work has established a role for HCRT in stress responses to anxiety-and panic-associated behaviors (Harris et al, 2005; Johnson et al, 2010, 2012; Suzuki et al, 2005). However, whether HCRT-related stress reactivity is sensitized under conditions of chronic cocaine, promoting the hyper-aroused state required for drug-taking, has yet to be determined. Additionally, it will be interesting to examine the effect of Hcrt knockdown on stress-induced reinstatement cocaine-seeking in future studies.

In conclusion, extended-access cocaine self-administration extends the role of HCRT signaling in the motivational activation of cocaine reinforcement, such that HCRT contributes not only to high-effort but also to low-effort responding under conditions where motivation is high. Furthermore, our findings suggest the feasibility of normalizing compulsive cocaine intake in addicted individuals via sustained inhibition of HCRT signaling.

HCRT in reward-based feeding

Hcrt knockdown also decreased the motivation to obtain palatable food (SCM) under a PR schedule of reinforcement, which suggests a role for HCRT in food seeking under high-effort conditions, as well as during the consumption of highly palatable foods. This finding is consistent with the existing literature (for review, Mahler et al, 2014). HCRT was initially reported to regulate general feeding behavior by demonstrating that central administration of HCRT-1 and HCRT-2 stimulates feeding (Sakurai et al, 1998), whereas blockade of HCRT signaling with an HCRT-R1 antagonist, an anti-HCRT antibody, or genetic inactivation of Hcrt reduces food intake (Hara et al, 2001; Haynes et al, 2000; Yamada et al, 2000). Subsequent studies revealed that the modulation of feeding by HCRT is restricted to the light phase of the circadian cycle (España et al, 2002; McGregor et al, 2011). Our observations are consistent with the latter findings, as Hcrt silencing did not significantly affect responding for regular food pellets overall, but there was a trend for reduced food self-administration during the light phase. HCRT is also likely to play an important part in the hedonic aspect of feeding (i.e., feeding beyond caloric needs; Zheng and Berthoud, 2007). Consistent with this hypothesis, central administration of HCRT-1 increases the motivation for palatable food, whereas blockade of HCRT signaling with an HCRT-R1 antagonist attenuates this reward-based feeding (Borgland et al, 2009; Choi et al, 2010; Thorpe et al, 2005). Therefore, together with these studies, our data support the hypothesis that HCRT signaling mediates motivation to obtain palatable food.

HCRT modulation of arousal-dependent behavior

The present study showed that Hcrt knockdown did not affect food or water selfadministration, locomotor activity, or sensitivity to tests of anxiety-like behavior and stress-induced analgesia or corticosterone release. At first glance, these results may be surprising considering the established role of HCRT in a multitude of arousal-dependent behaviors and physiological functions including energy homeostasis, sleep/wake state, response to stress, and reinforcer-motivated behavior (for review, see Berridge and España, 2005; Boutrel and de, 2008; Johnson et al, 2010; Tsujino and Sakurai, 2009). It is possible that the lack of significant behavioral alterations following virally-mediated Hcrt silencing resulted from compensatory activity of the few remaining HCRT-positive neurons, which may have been sufficient to modulate relevant arousal-dependent behaviors. In addition, the fact that Hcrt expression was silenced in adult animals may explain the discrepancy with results obtained upon constitutive deletion of Hcrt in knockout mice, whose phenotype may partially result from developmental compensations (or review, de Lecea et al, 2002).

In the present study, shHCRT-treated rats maintained normal body weights, levels of food and water consumption, and locomotor activity. In particular, there was no detectable effect of Hcrt silencing on these measures during the dark phase of the circadian cycle, when cocaine and SCM self-administration sessions were conducted. This rules out performance disruption as a potential explanation for the reduction in operant responding for cocaine and SCM.

In addition, Hcrt knockdown did not produce a significant blunting of stress sensitivity in the absence of cocaine, as measured by anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze and thermal analgesia or plasma corticosterone elevation following forced swim stress. This suggests that HCRT neurotransmission does not indiscriminately contribute to all responses to psychological or physiological stressors and that the implication of HCRT signaling in extended-access cocaine self-administration is specific to homeostasis and affective state dysregulation associated with withdrawal from chronic, excessive cocaine intake.

Molecular neuroadaptations following virally-mediated shRNA interference in the rat

To date, physiological functions of the HCRT neuropeptide system have mainly been investigated using acute pharmacological manipulation or constitutive gene deletion. A limited number of studies have used alternative approaches such as local infusions of small interfering RNAs or antisense morpholinos for the transient knockdown of HCRT (Chen et al, 2006; Kim et al, 2015; Prasad and McNally, 2014; Reissner et al, 2012), or local injection of shRNA-encoding viral vectors for the long-term knockdown of HCRT, HCRT-R1 or HCRT-R2 (Arendt et al, 2014; Chen et al, 2010, 2013; Choi et al, 2012; Sharf et al, 2010). Here we report virally-mediated knockdown of HCRT in adult rats. Thus, the novelty of our approach warranted further examination of molecular adaptations potentially elicited by sustained silencing of Hcrt expression in the adult brain.

In the dorsal hypothalamus, DYN and HCRT are expressed by the same neurons, being co-released from the same synaptic vesicle (Chou et al, 2001; Muschamp et al, 2014). Furthermore, these neurons synapse onto each other and local release of DYN tonically inhibits neighboring HCRT neurons (Li and van den Pol, 2006). We found that HCRT knockdown was accompanied by a ~34-53% reduction in the number of Pdyn-positive cells in the HCRT neuronal field (i.e., dorsal hypothalamus). Importantly, the shHCRT vector had no effect on Pdyn expression in more ventral regions of the hypothalamus, thereby ruling out an off-target effect of the shRNA sequence on Pdyn mRNA, or a neurotoxic effect of viral transduction or GFP expression. This observation suggests that Pdyn downregulation is a compensatory adaptation that occurs downstream of HCRT knockdown. DYN has been shown to balance the effects of HCRT on neuronal excitability in a subset of ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons (Baimel et al, 2017; Muschamp et al, 2014). Thus, in shHCRT-treated rats, the reduced need to control the activity of HCRT neurons in the absence of excitatory HCRT transmission could have triggered Pdyn downregulation. At the behavioral level, HCRT- and DYN-receptor activation both elicit an upward shift of intracranial reward thresholds (Boutrel et al, 2005; Todtenkopf et al, 2004). It is possible that the downregulation of Pdyn associated with HCRT knockdown may have potentiated the amplitude of phenotypic changes observed in shHCRT rats. HCRT-DYN interaction effects on cocaine self-administration is an important topic for future studies.

Additionally, we observed that HCRT knockdown induced a moderate, although not statistically significant, decrease in the number of MCH-positive cells (~36% reduction). MCH neurons are intermingled with HCRT neurons (Broberger et al, 1998; Elias et al, 1998) and several studies have indicated a direct connectivity between these two cell types, whereby HCRT excites MCH neurons and MCH counters the activation of HCRT neurons (Barson et al, 2013; Gao and van den Pol, 2001, 2002; van den Pol et al, 2004; Rao et al, 2008). The inhibitory tone exerted by MCH on HCRT neurons could explain how MCH downregulation may represent a network adaptation to sustained inhibition of HCRT transmission. A recent study also revealed HCRT neurons inhibit MCH neurons via a local microcircuit involving HCRT-induced GABA release (Apergis-Schoute et al, 2015). It is therefore possible that MCH was downregulated to compensate for the loss of HCRT-driven inhibition of MCH neurons in shHCRT rats. At the behavioral level, blocking MCH signaling attenuates cocaine self-administration, as well as cue- and drug-induced reinstatement (Chung et al, 2009). Similar effects were reported for alcohol (Cippitelli et al, 2010). Thus, in the current studies, MCH downregulation may have contributed to decreasing cocaine intake in shHCRT rats, but this would need to be directly tested in future studies.

Finally, the adaptations elicited by sustained inhibition of HCRT signaling in adulthood may differ from developmental compensations elicited by constitutive gene knockout or genetic ablation of neurons (e.g., Sharf et al, 2010). Notably, Pdyn expression in the dorsal hypothalamus is unchanged in HCRT knockout mice and MCH neurons are not affected in mice that have lost HCRT neurons shortly after birth (Chou et al, 2001; Hara et al, 2001). Although counterintuitive, these observations combined with our findings suggest that late-onset downregulation of HCRT signaling is more prone to elicit perturbations in cross-talking neuropeptide systems than the life-long absence of HCRT. An important implication of this interpretation is that chronic administration of a HCRT-receptor antagonist in adult subjects would be expected to produce similar reductions in hypothalamic PDYN and MCH expression, which may in turn enhance the therapeutic efficacy of this approach in the treatment of cocaine use disorder.

Conclusion

In summary, long-term Hcrt silencing via virally-mediated RNA interference yielded novel insights into the role of HCRT transmission in cocaine and palatable food reinforcement without affecting general activity, operant performance, or stress reactivity. Hcrt knockdown attenuated cocaine and SCM self-administration selectively under high-effort conditions and reduced cocaine intake under conditions of high-motivation associated with extended-access. These findings suggest a specific functional role for HCRT signaling in compulsive-like cocaine self-administration, as well as in reward-based feeding behavior.

Supplementary information is available at the Neuropsychopharmacology website.

Acknowledgements

Funding and Disclosures: This research was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, DA004398 (GFK), DA033344 (RMF), DA036355 (BES), the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, AA016658 (BLK), AA024198/AA006420/AA021491 (CC) and AA024146/AA006420 (RMF), and by the Pearson Center for Alcoholism and Addiction Research. A portion of this work was also supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The authors thank Zhi-Bing You for assistance with corticosterone measurements. The authors declare no conflict of interest. This is article number 29409 from the Scripps Research Institute.

References

  1. ↵
    Ahmed SH, Kenny PJ, Koob GF, Markou A (2002). Neurobiological evidence for hedonic allostasis associated with escalating cocaine use. Nat Neurosci 5: 625–626.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Ahmed SH, Koob GF (1998). Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: change in hedonic set point. Science 282: 298–300.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Anderson RI, Becker HC, Adams BL, Jesudason CD, Rorick-Kehn LM (2014). Orexin-1 and orexin-2 receptor antagonists reduce ethanol self-administration in high-drinking rodent models. Front Neurosci 8: 33.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    Apergis-Schoute J, Iordanidou P, Faure C, Jego S, Schöne C, Aitta-Aho T, et al. (2015). Optogenetic evidence for inhibitory signaling from orexin to MCH neurons via local microcircuits. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 35: 5435–5441.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Arendt DH, Hassell J, Li H, Achua JK, Guarnieri DJ, Dileone RJ, et al. (2014). Anxiolytic function of the orexin 2/hypocretin A receptor in the basolateral amygdala. Psychoneuroendocrinology 40: 17–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Aujla H, Martin-Fardon R, Weiss F (2008). Rats with extended access to cocaine exhibit increased stress reactivity and sensitivity to the anxiolytic-like effects of the mGluR 2/3 agonist LY379268 during abstinence. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 33: 1818–1826.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Baimel C, Lau BK, Qiao M, Borgland SL (2017). Projection-Target-Defined Effects of Orexin and Dynorphin on VTA Dopamine Neurons. Cell Rep 18: 1346–1355.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Baldo BA, Daniel RA, Berridge CW, Kelley AE (2003). Overlapping distributions of orexin/hypocretin-and dopamine-beta-hydroxylase immunoreactive fibers in rat brain regions mediating arousal, motivation, and stress. JComp Neurol 464: 220–237.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Barson JR, Morganstern I, Leibowitz SF (2013). Complementary roles of orexin and melaninconcentrating hormone in feeding behavior. Int J Endocrinol 2013: 983964.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Berridge C., España R. (2005). Hypocretin/orexin in stress and arousal. Hypocretins Integr Physiol Funct 351–368.
  11. ↵
    Borgland SL, Chang S-J, Bowers MS, Thompson JL, Vittoz N, Floresco SB, et al. (2009). Orexin A/hypocretin-1 selectively promotes motivation for positive reinforcers. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 29: 11215–11225.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Boutrel B, de LL (2008). Addiction and arousal: the hypocretin connection. Physiol Behav 93: 947–951.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Boutrel B, Kenny PJ, Specio SE, Martin-Fardon R, Markou A, Koob GF, et al. (2005). Role for hypocretin in mediating stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA 102: 19168–19173.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Broberger C, De Lecea L, Sutcliffe JG, Hökfelt T (1998). Hypocretin/orexin-and melaninconcentrating hormone-expressing cells form distinct populations in the rodent lateral hypothalamus: relationship to the neuropeptide Y and agouti gene-related protein systems. J Comp Neurol 402: 460–474.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Brown RM, Khoo SY-S, Lawrence AJ (2013). Central orexin (hypocretin) 2 receptor antagonism reduces ethanol self-administration, but not cue-conditioned ethanol-seeking, in ethanolpreferring rats. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Off Sci J Coll Int Neuropsychopharmacol CINP 16: 2067–2079.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Cason AM, Aston-Jones G (2013a). Attenuation of saccharin-seeking in rats by orexin/hypocretin receptor 1 antagonist. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 228: 499–507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Cason AM, Aston-Jones G (2013b). Role of orexin/hypocretin in conditioned sucrose-seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 226: 155–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Chen L, McKenna JT, Bolortuya Y, Brown RE, McCarley RW (2013). Knockdown of orexin type 2 receptor in the lateral pontomesencephalic tegmentum of rats increases REM sleep. Eur J Neurosci 37: 957–963.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Chen L, McKenna JT, Bolortuya Y, Winston S, Thakkar MM, Basheer R, et al. (2010). Knockdown of Orexin Type I Receptor in Rat Locus Coeruleus increases REM Sleep during the Dark Period. Eur J Neurosci 32: 1528–1536.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Chen L, Thakkar MM, Winston S, Bolortuya Y, Basheer R, McCarley RW (2006). REM sleep changes in rats induced by siRNA-mediated orexin knockdown. Eur J Neurosci 24: 2039–2048.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Choi DL, Davis JF, Fitzgerald ME, Benoit SC (2010). The role of orexin-A in food motivation, reward-based feeding behavior and food-induced neuronal activation in rats. Neuroscience 167: 11–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Choi DL, Davis JF, Magrisso IJ, Fitzgerald ME, Lipton JW, Benoit SC (2012). Orexin signaling in the paraventricular thalamic nucleus modulates mesolimbic dopamine and hedonic feeding in the rat. Neuroscience 210: 243–248.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Chou TC, Lee CE, Lu J, Elmquist JK, Hara J, Willie JT, et al. (2001). Orexin (Hypocretin) Neurons Contain Dynorphin. J Neurosci 21: RC168–RC168.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Chung S, Hopf FW, Nagasaki H, Li C-Y, Belluzzi JD, Bonci A, et al. (2009). The melaninconcentrating hormone system modulates cocaine reward. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 6772–6777.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Cippitelli A, Karlsson C, Shaw JL, Thorsell A, Gehlert DR, Heilig M (2010). Suppression of alcohol self-administration and reinstatement of alcohol seeking by melaninconcentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCH1-R) antagonism in Wistar rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 211: 367–375.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Darcq E, Koebel P, Del Boca C, Pannetier S, Kirstetter A-S, Garnier J-M, et al. (2011). RSK2 signaling in brain habenula contributes to place aversion learning. Learn Mem Cold Spring Harb N 18: 574–578.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    Dhaher R, Hauser SR, Getachew B, Bell RL, McBride WJ, McKinzie DL, et al. (2010). The Orexin-1 Receptor Antagonist SB-334867 Reduces Alcohol Relapse Drinking, but not Alcohol-Seeking, in Alcohol-Preferring (P) Rats. J Addict Med 4: 153–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Elias CF, Lee CE, Kelly JF, Ahima RS, Kuhar M, Saper CB, et al. (2001). Characterization of CART neurons in the rat and human hypothalamus. J Comp Neurol 432: 1–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Elias CF, Saper CB, Maratos-Flier E, Tritos NA, Lee C, Kelly J, et al. (1998). Chemically defined projections linking the mediobasal hypothalamus and the lateral hypothalamic area. J Comp Neurol 402: 442–459.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Espa¤a RA, Plahn S, Berridge CW (2002). Circadian-dependent and circadian-independent behavioral actions of hypocretin/orexin. Brain Res 943: 224–236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    España RA, Melchior JR, Roberts DCS, Jones SR (2011). Hypocretin 1/orexin A in the ventral tegmental area enhances dopamine responses to cocaine and promotes cocaine selfadministration. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 214: 415–426.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    España RA, Oleson EB, Locke JL, Brookshire BR, Roberts DCS, Jones SR (2010). The hypocretin-orexin system regulates cocaine self-administration via actions on the mesolimbic dopamine system. Eur J Neurosci 31: 336–348.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    Gao XB, Pol AN van den (2001). Melanin concentrating hormone depresses synaptic activity of glutamate and GABA neurons from rat lateral hypothalamus. J Physiol 533: 237–252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    Gao X-B, Pol AN van den (2002). Melanin-concentrating hormone depresses L-, N-, and P/Q-type voltage-dependent calcium channels in rat lateral hypothalamic neurons. J Physiol 542: 273–286.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    Hara J, Beuckmann CT, Nambu T, Willie JT, Chemelli RM, Sinton CM, et al. (2001). Genetic ablation of orexin neurons in mice results in narcolepsy, hypophagia, and obesity. Neuron 30: 345–354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Harris GC, Wimmer M, Jones G ston- (2005). A role for lateral hypothalamic orexin neurons in reward seeking. Nature 437: 556–559.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    Hata T, Chen J, Ebihara K, Date Y, Ishida Y, Nakahara D (2011). Intra-ventral tegmental area or intracerebroventricular orexin-A increases the intra-cranial self-stimulation threshold via activation of the corticotropin-releasing factor system in rats. Eur J Neurosci 34: 816–826.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    Haynes AC, Jackson B, Chapman H, Tadayyon M, Johns A, Porter RA, et al. (2000). A selective orexin-1 receptor antagonist reduces food consumption in male and female rats. RegulPept 96: 45–51.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    Herman MA, Sidhu H, Stouffer DG, Kreifeldt M, Le D, Cates-Gatto C, et al. (2015). GIRK3 gates activation of the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway by ethanol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112: 7091–7096.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Hollander JA, Lu Q, Cameron MD, Kamenecka TM, Kenny PJ (2008). Insular hypocretin transmission regulates nicotine reward. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA 105: 19480–19485.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Hollander JA, Pham D, Fowler CD, Kenny PJ (2012). Hypocretin-1 receptors regulate the reinforcing and reward-enhancing effects of cocaine: pharmacological and behavioral genetics evidence. Front Behav Neurosci 6: 47.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    Johnson PL, Molosh A, Fitz SD, Truitt WA, Shekhar A (2012). Orexin, stress, and anxiety/panic states. Prog Brain Res 198: 133–161.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    Johnson PL, Truitt W, Fitz SD, Minick PE, Dietrich A, Sanghani S, et al. (2010). A key role for orexin in panic anxiety. Nat Med 16: 111–115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Jonkman S, Pelloux Y, Everitt BJ (2012). Drug intake is sufficient, but conditioning is not necessary for the emergence of compulsive cocaine seeking after extended selfadministration. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 37: 1612–1619.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    Jupp B, Krivdic B, Krstew E, Lawrence AJ (2011). The orexin₁ receptor antagonist SB-334867 dissociates the motivational properties of alcohol and sucrose in rats. Brain Res 1391: 54–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    Kim T-K, Kim J-E, Park J-Y, Lee J-E, Choi J, Kim H, et al. (2015). Antidepressant effects of exercise are produced via suppression of hypocretin/orexin and melanin-concentrating hormone in the basolateral amygdala. Neurobiol Dis 79: 59–69.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    Koob GF, Buck CL, Cohen A, Edwards S, Park PE, Schlosburg JE, et al. (2014). Addiction as a stress surfeit disorder. Neuropharmacology 76 Pt B: 370–382.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    de Lecea L, Kilduff TS, Peyron C, Gao X, Foye PE, Danielson PE, et al. (1998). The hypocretins: hypothalamus-specific peptides with neuroexcitatory activity. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA 95: 322–327.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    de Lecea L, Sutcliffe JG, Fabre V (2002). Hypocretins/orexins as integrators of physiological information: lessons from mutant animals. Neuropeptides 36: 85–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    LeSage MG, Perry JL, Kotz CM, Shelley D, Corrigall WA (2010). Nicotine self-administration in the rat: effects of hypocretin antagonists and changes in hypocretin mRNA. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 209: 203–212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Li Y, Pol AN van den (2006). Differential target-dependent actions of coexpressed inhibitory dynorphin and excitatory hypocretin/orexin neuropeptides. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 26: 13037–13047.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Lopez MF, Moorman DE, Aston-Jones G, Becker HC (2016). The highly selective orexin/hypocretin 1 receptor antagonist GSK1059865 potently reduces ethanol drinking in ethanol dependent mice. Brain Res doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.049.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    Mahler SV, Moorman DE, Smith RJ, James MH, Aston-Jones G (2014). Motivational activation: a unifying hypothesis of orexin/hypocretin function. Nat Neurosci 17: 1298–1303.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Mantsch JR, Baker DA, Francis DM, Katz ES, Hoks MA, Serge JP (2008). Stressor-and corticotropin releasing factor-induced reinstatement and active stress-related behavioral responses are augmented following long-access cocaine self-administration by rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 195: 591–603.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Mantsch JR, Yuferov V, Mathieu-Kia A-M, Ho A, Kreek MJ (2004). Effects of extended access to high versus low cocaine doses on self-administration, cocaine-induced reinstatement and brain mRNA levels in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 175: 26–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Marcus JN, Aschkenasi CJ, Lee CE, Chemelli RM, Saper CB, Yanagisawa M, et al. (2001). Differential expression of orexin receptors 1 and 2 in the rat brain. J Comp Neurol 435: 6–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    Martin-Fardon R, Cauvi G, Kerr TM, Weiss F (2016). Differential role of hypothalamic orexin/hypocretin neurons in reward seeking motivated by cocaine versus palatable food. Addict Biol doi:10.1111/adb.12441.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. ↵
    Martin-Fardon R, Weiss F (2014a). Blockade of hypocretin receptor-1 preferentially prevents cocaine seeking: comparison with natural reward seeking. Neuroreport 25: 485–488.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  59. ↵
    Martin-Fardon R, Weiss F (2014b). N-(2-methyl-6-benzoxazolyl)-N'-1,5-naphthyridin-4-yl urea (SB334867), a hypocretin receptor-1 antagonist, preferentially prevents ethanol seeking: comparison with natural reward seeking. Addict Biol 19: 233–236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Martin-Fardon R, Zorrilla EP, Ciccocioppo R, Weiss F (2010). Role of innate and drug-induced dysregulation of brain stress and arousal systems in addiction: Focus on corticotropinreleasing factor, nociceptin/orphanin FQ, and orexin/hypocretin. Brain Res 1314: 145–161.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Matzeu A, Kerr TM, Weiss F, Martin-Fardon R (2016). Orexin-A/Hypocretin-1 Mediates Cocaine-Seeking Behavior in the Posterior Paraventricular Nucleus of the Thalamus via Orexin/Hypocretin Receptor-2. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 359: 273–279.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    McGregor R, Wu M-F, Barber G, Ramanathan L, Siegel JM (2011). Highly specific role of hypocretin (orexin) neurons: differential activation as a function of diurnal phase, operant reinforcement versus operant avoidance and light level. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 31: 15455–15467.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    Muschamp JW, Hollander JA, Thompson JL, Voren G, Hassinger LC, Onvani S, et al. (2014). Hypocretin (orexin) facilitates reward by attenuating the antireward effects of its cotransmitter dynorphin in ventral tegmental area. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111: E1648–E1655.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    Nambu T, Sakurai T, Mizukami K, Hosoya Y, Yanagisawa M, Goto K (1999). Distribution of orexin neurons in the adult rat brain. Brain Res 827: 243–260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    Olney JJ, Navarro M, Thiele TE (2015). Binge-like consumption of ethanol and other salient reinforcers is blocked by orexin-1 receptor inhibition and leads to a reduction of hypothalamic orexin immunoreactivity. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 39: 21–29.
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    Orio L, Edwards S, George O, Parsons LH, Koob GF (2009). A role for the endocannabinoid system in the increased motivation for cocaine in extended-access conditions. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 29: 4846–4857.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    Paxinos G, Watson C (Academic Press: 2013). The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. at <http://store.elsevier.com/The-Rat-Brain-in-Stereotaxic-Coordinates/George-Paxinos/isbn-9780123919496/>.
  68. ↵
    Pelloux Y, Everitt BJ, Dickinson A (2007). Compulsive drug seeking by rats under punishment: effects of drug taking history. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 194: 127–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Peyron C, Tighe DK, Den Pol AN van, Lecea L de, Heller HC, Sutcliffe JG, et al. (1998). Neurons containing hypocretin (orexin) project to multiple neuronal systems. JNeurosci 18: 9996–10015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    Plaza-Zabala A, Flores Á, Martín-García E, Saravia R, Maldonado R, Berrendero F (2013). A role for hypocretin/orexin receptor-1 in cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine-seeking behavior. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 38: 1724–1736.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    Plaza-Zabala A, Martín-García E, Lecea L de, Maldonado R, Berrendero F (2010). Hypocretins regulate the anxiogenic-like effects of nicotine and induce reinstatement of nicotineseeking behavior. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 30: 2300–2310.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    Pol AN van den, Acuna-Goycolea C, Clark KR, Ghosh PK (2004). Physiological properties of hypothalamic MCH neurons identified with selective expression of reporter gene after recombinant virus infection. Neuron 42: 635–652.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  73. ↵
    Prasad AA, McNally GP (2014). Effects of vivo morpholino knockdown of lateral hypothalamus orexin/hypocretin on renewal of alcohol seeking. PloS One 9: e110385.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    Prince CD, Rau AR, Yorgason JT, España RA (2015). Hypocretin/Orexin regulation of dopamine signaling and cocaine self-administration is mediated predominantly by hypocretin receptor 1. ACS Chem Neurosci 6: 138–146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    Rao Y, Lu M, Ge F, Marsh DJ, Qian S, Wang AH, et al. (2008). Regulation of synaptic efficacy in hypocretin/orexin-containing neurons by melanin concentrating hormone in the lateral hypothalamus. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 28: 9101–9110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    Reissner KJ, Sartor GC, Vazey EM, Dunn TE, Aston-Jones G, Kalivas PW (2012). Use of vivo-morpholinos for control of protein expression in the adult rat brain. J Neurosci Methods 203: 354–360.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  77. ↵
    Sakurai T, Amemiya A, Ishii M, Matsuzaki I, Chemelli RM, Tanaka H, et al. (1998). Orexins and orexin receptors: a family of hypothalamic neuropeptides and G protein-coupled receptors that regulate feeding behavior [comment]. Cell 92: 1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  78. ↵
    Schmeichel BE, Barbier E, Misra KK, Contet C, Schlosburg JE, Grigoriadis D, et al. (2015). Hypocretin receptor 2 antagonism dose-dependently reduces escalated heroin selfadministration in rats. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 40: 1123–1129.
    OpenUrl
  79. Schmeichel BE, Herman MA, Roberto M, Koob GF (2017). Hypocretin Neurotransmission Within the Central Amygdala Mediates Escalated Cocaine Self-administration and Stress-Induced Reinstatement in Rats. Biol Psychiatry 81: 606–615.
    OpenUrl
  80. ↵
    Schmitt O, Usunoff KG, Lazarov NE, Itzev DE, Eipert P, Rolfs A, et al. (2012). Orexinergic innervation of the extended amygdala and basal ganglia in the rat. Brain Struct Funct 217: 233–256.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  81. ↵
    Sharf R, Sarhan M, Brayton CE, Guarnieri DJ, Taylor JR, DiLeone RJ (2010). Orexin signaling via the orexin 1 receptor mediates operant responding for food reinforcement. Biol Psychiatry 67: 753–760.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  82. ↵
    Smith RJ, Aston-Jones G (2012). Orexin/hypocretin 1 receptor antagonist reduces heroin selfadministration and cue-induced heroin seeking. Eur J Neurosci 35: 798–804.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    Smith RJ, See RE, Aston-Jones G (2009). Orexin/hypocretin signaling at the orexin 1 receptor regulates cue-elicited cocaine-seeking. Eur J Neurosci 30: 493–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  84. ↵
    Smith RJ, Tahsili-Fahadan P, Aston-Jones G (2010). Orexin/hypocretin is necessary for context-driven cocaine-seeking. Neuropharmacology 58: 179–184.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  85. ↵
    Suzuki M, Beuckmann CT, Shikata K, Ogura H, Sawai T (2005). Orexin-A (hypocretin-1) is possibly involved in generation of anxiety-like behavior. Brain Res 1044: 116–121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  86. ↵
    Thorpe AJ, Cleary JP, Levine AS, Kotz CM (2005). Centrally administered orexin A increases motivation for sweet pellets in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 182: 75–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    Todtenkopf MS, Marcus JF, Portoghese PS, Carlezon WA (2004). Effects of kappa-opioid receptor ligands on intracranial self-stimulation in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 172: 463–470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    Trivedi P, Yu H, MacNeil DJ, Van der Ploeg LH, Guan XM (1998). Distribution of orexin receptor mRNA in the rat brain. FEBS Lett 438: 71–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  89. ↵
    Tsujino N, Sakurai T (2009). Orexin/hypocretin: a neuropeptide at the interface of sleep, energy homeostasis, and reward system. Pharmacol Rev 61: 162–176.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. ↵
    Vanderschuren LJMJ, Everitt BJ (2004). Drug Seeking Becomes Compulsive After Prolonged Cocaine Self-Administration. Science 305: 1017–1019.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. ↵
    Vendruscolo LF, Pamplona FA, Takahashi RN (2004). Strain and sex differences in the expression of nociceptive behavior and stress-induced analgesia in rats. Brain Res 1030: 277–283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    Wang B, You Z-B, Wise RA (2009). Reinstatement of cocaine-seeking by hypocretin (orexin) in the ventral tegmental area: Independence from the local CRF network. Biol Psychiatry 65: 857–862.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  93. ↵
    Wee S, Mandyam CD, Lekic DM, Koob GF (2008). Alpha 1-noradrenergic system role in increased motivation for cocaine intake in rats with prolonged access. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 18: 303–311.
    OpenUrl
  94. ↵
    Wee S, Vendruscolo LF, Misra KK, Schlosburg JE, Koob GF (2012). A Combination of Buprenorphine and Naltrexone Blocks Compulsive Cocaine Intake in Rodents Without Producing Dependence. Sci Transl Med 4: 146ra110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  95. ↵
    Yamada H, Okumura T, Motomura W, Kobayashi Y, Kohgo Y (2000). Inhibition of food intake by central injection of anti-orexin antibody in fasted rats. BiochemBiophysResCommun 267: 527–531.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  96. ↵
    Zheng H, Berthoud H-R (2007). Eating for pleasure or calories. Curr Opin Pharmacol 7: 607–612.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  97. ↵
    Zhou L, Ghee SM, Chan C, Lin L, Cameron MD, Kenny PJ, et al. (2012). Orexin-1 receptor mediation of cocaine seeking in male and female rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 340: 801–809.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  98. ↵
    Zorrilla EP, Wee S, Zhao Y, Specio S, Boutrel B, Koob GF, et al. (2012). Extended access cocaine self-administration differentially activates dorsal raphe and amygdala corticotropin-releasing factor systems in rats. Addict Biol 17: 300–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Posted September 05, 2017.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email
Knockdown of Hypocretin/Orexin Attenuates Extended-Access Cocaine Self-Administration in Rats
Brooke E. Schmeichel, Alessandra Matzeu, Pascale Koebel, Leandro F. Vendruscolo, Brigitte L. Kieffer, George F. Koob, Rémi Martin-Fardon, Candice Contet
bioRxiv 184911; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/184911
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area