Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Positional encoding in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)

Elisabetta Versace, Jessica R. Rogge, Natalie Shelton-May, Andrea Ravignani
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/186692
Elisabetta Versace
1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge (USA)
2Centre for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica R. Rogge
1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge (USA)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalie Shelton-May
1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge (USA)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Ravignani
3Veterinary & Research Department, Sealcentre Pieterburen, 9968 AG Pieterburen, The Netherlands
4Artificial Intelligence Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
5Language and Cognition Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6525 XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Strategies used in artificial grammar learning can shed light into the abilities of different species to extract regularities from the environment. In the A(X)nB rule, A and B items are linked but assigned to different positional categories and separated by distractor items. Open questions are how widespread is the ability to extract positional regularities from A(X)nB patterns, which strategies are used to encode positional regularities and whether individuals exhibit preferences for absolute or relative position encoding. We used visual arrays to investigate whether cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) can learn this rule and which strategies they use. After training on a subset of exemplars, half of the tested monkeys successfully generalized to novel combinations. These tamarins discriminated between categories of tokens with different properties (A, B, X) and detected a positional relationship between non-adjacent items even in the presence of novel distractors. Generalization, though, was incomplete, since we observed a failure with items that during training had always been presented in reinforced arrays. The pattern of errors revealed that successful subjects used visual similarity with training stimuli to solve the task, and that tamarins extracted the relative position of As and Bs rather than their absolute position, similarly to what observed in other species. Relative position encoding appears to be the default strategy in different tasks and taxa.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 10, 2017.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Positional encoding in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Positional encoding in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)
Elisabetta Versace, Jessica R. Rogge, Natalie Shelton-May, Andrea Ravignani
bioRxiv 186692; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/186692
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Positional encoding in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)
Elisabetta Versace, Jessica R. Rogge, Natalie Shelton-May, Andrea Ravignani
bioRxiv 186692; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/186692

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4658)
  • Biochemistry (10311)
  • Bioengineering (7631)
  • Bioinformatics (26229)
  • Biophysics (13465)
  • Cancer Biology (10641)
  • Cell Biology (15358)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8462)
  • Ecology (12774)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16784)
  • Genetics (11370)
  • Genomics (15423)
  • Immunology (10568)
  • Microbiology (25083)
  • Molecular Biology (10170)
  • Neuroscience (54222)
  • Paleontology (398)
  • Pathology (1660)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2879)
  • Physiology (4322)
  • Plant Biology (9207)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1582)
  • Synthetic Biology (2543)
  • Systems Biology (6759)
  • Zoology (1456)