Abstract
The ability to manipulate neural activity with precision is an asset in uncovering neural circuits for decision-making. Diverse tools for manipulating neurons are available for mice, but the feasibility of mice for decision-making studies remains unclear, especially when decisions require accumulating visual evidence. For example, whether mice’ decisions reflect leaky accumulation is not established, and the relevant and irrelevant factors that influence decisions are unknown. Further, causal circuits for visual evidence accumulation have not been established. To address these issues, we measured >500,000 decisions in 27 mice trained to judge the fluctuating rate of a sequence of flashes. Information throughout the 1000ms trial influenced choice, but early information was most influential. This suggests that information persists in neural circuits for ~1000ms with minimal accumulation leak. Further, while animals primarily based decisions on current stimulus rate, they were unable to entirely suppress additional factors: total stimulus brightness and the previous trial’s outcome. Next, we optogenetically inhibited anteromedial (AM) visual area using JAWS. Importantly, light activation biased choices in both injected and uninjected animals, demonstrating that light alone influences behavior. By varying stimulus-response contingency while holding stimulated hemisphere constant, we surmounted this obstacle to demonstrate that AM suppression biases decisions. By leveraging a large dataset to quantitatively characterize decision-making behavior, we establish mice as suitable for neural circuit manipulation studies, including the one here. Further, by demonstrating that mice accumulate visual evidence, we demonstrate that this strategy for reducing uncertainty in decision-making is employed by animals with diverse visual systems.
Significance statement To connect behaviors to their underlying neural mechanism, a deep understanding of the behavioral strategy is needed. This understanding is incomplete in mouse studies, in part because existing datasets have been too small to quantitatively characterize decision-making behavior. To surmount this, we measured the outcome of over 500,000 decisions made by 27 mice trained to judge visual stimuli. Our analyses offer new insights into mice’ decision-making strategies and compares them with those of other species. We then disrupted neural activity in a candidate neural structure and examined the effect on decisions. Our findings establish mice as a suitable organism for visual accumulation of evidence decisions. Further, the results highlight similarities in decision-making strategies across very different species.
Footnotes
Competing financial interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
