Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A population-level statistic for assessing Mendelian behavior of genotyping-by-sequencing data from highly duplicated genomes

View ORCID ProfileLindsay V. Clark, Wittney Mays, View ORCID ProfileAlexander E. Lipka, View ORCID ProfileErik J. Sacks
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.11.902890
Lindsay V. Clark
1Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lindsay V. Clark
  • For correspondence: lvclark@illinois.edu
Wittney Mays
2Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
3Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander E. Lipka
2Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexander E. Lipka
Erik J. Sacks
2Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Erik J. Sacks
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Given the economic and environmental importance of allopolyploids and other species with highly duplicated genomes, there is a need for methods to distinguish paralogs, i.e. duplicate sequences within a genome, from Mendelian loci, i.e. single copy sequences that pair at meiosis. The ratio of observed to expected heterozygosity is an effective tool for filtering loci but requires genotyping to be performed first at a high computational cost, whereas counting the number of sequence tags detected per genotype is computationally quick but very ineffective in inbred or polyploid populations. Therefore, new methods are needed for filtering paralogs.

Results We introduce a novel statistic, Hind/HE, that uses the probability that two reads sampled from a genotype will belong to different alleles, instead of observed heterozygosity. The expected value of Hind/HE is the same across all loci in a dataset, regardless of read depth or allele frequency. In contrast to methods based on observed heterozygosity, it can be estimated and used for filtering loci prior to genotype calling. In addition to filtering paralogs, it can be used to filter loci with null alleles or high overdispersion, and identify individuals with unexpected ploidy and hybrid status. We demonstrate that the statistic is useful at read depths as low as five to 10, well below the depth needed for accurate genotype calling in polyploid and outcrossing species.

Conclusions Our methodology for estimating Hind/HE across loci and individuals, as well as determining reasonable thresholds for filtering loci, is implemented in polyRAD v1.6, available at https://github.com/lvclark/polyRAD. In large sequencing datasets, we anticipate that the ability to filter markers and identify problematic individuals prior to genotype calling will save researchers considerable computational time.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Analyses were added in response to feedback from peer review, in particular to test the effect of sequencing error on the Hind/He statistic, compare the statistic to others that are used to filter paralogs, and examine how filtering using the statistic impacts the distribution of minor allele frequency and the proportion of markers in genes.

  • https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5425343

  • https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-8170405_V1

  • https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-4814898_V1

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 16, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A population-level statistic for assessing Mendelian behavior of genotyping-by-sequencing data from highly duplicated genomes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A population-level statistic for assessing Mendelian behavior of genotyping-by-sequencing data from highly duplicated genomes
Lindsay V. Clark, Wittney Mays, Alexander E. Lipka, Erik J. Sacks
bioRxiv 2020.01.11.902890; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.11.902890
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A population-level statistic for assessing Mendelian behavior of genotyping-by-sequencing data from highly duplicated genomes
Lindsay V. Clark, Wittney Mays, Alexander E. Lipka, Erik J. Sacks
bioRxiv 2020.01.11.902890; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.11.902890

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3609)
  • Biochemistry (7584)
  • Bioengineering (5533)
  • Bioinformatics (20816)
  • Biophysics (10341)
  • Cancer Biology (7992)
  • Cell Biology (11652)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6616)
  • Ecology (10222)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13639)
  • Genetics (9553)
  • Genomics (12856)
  • Immunology (7928)
  • Microbiology (19561)
  • Molecular Biology (7674)
  • Neuroscience (42165)
  • Paleontology (308)
  • Pathology (1259)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2204)
  • Physiology (3271)
  • Plant Biology (7052)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1294)
  • Synthetic Biology (1953)
  • Systems Biology (5431)
  • Zoology (1119)